Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
MINI Aceman vs Tesla Model Y – Performance, range & efficiency compared
Two cars, one duel: MINI Aceman meets Tesla Model Y.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
Aceman
@ MINI / BMW Group Press
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
MINI Aceman has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25500 £, while the Tesla Model Y costs 34300 £. That’s a price difference of around 8820 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Tesla Model Y: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the MINI Aceman with 14 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.90 kWh.
As for range, the Tesla Model Y performs distinct better – achieving up to 622 km, about 217 km more than the MINI Aceman.
Model Y
@ Tesla, Inc.
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Tesla Model Y has a clearly edge – offering 627 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 369 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model Y is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 3.50 s, while the MINI Aceman takes 6.40 s. That’s about 2.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Tesla Model Y performs slightly better – reaching 250 km/h, while the MINI Aceman tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 50 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Tesla Model Y pulls noticeable stronger with 493 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 143 Nm difference.
Aceman
@ MINI / BMW Group Press
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, MINI Aceman is a bit lighter – 1720 kg compared to 1976 kg. The difference is around 256 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Tesla Model Y offers decisively more room – 822 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 522 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Tesla Model Y performs significantly better – up to 2138 L, which is about 1133 L more than the MINI Aceman.
When it comes to payload, MINI Aceman slightly takes the win – 530 kg compared to 472 kg. That’s a difference of about 58 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Tesla Model Y shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £34,300
@ Tesla, Inc.
Tesla Model Y
MINI Aceman
The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
details
@ MINI / BMW Group Press
@ MINI / BMW Group Press
@ MINI / BMW Group Press
Tesla Model Y
The Tesla Model Y blends SUV practicality with sports-car poke, wrapping a roomy, minimalist cabin and handy hatch into a slick, aerodynamic package that feels more Silicon Valley gadget than garage ornament. It’s an ideal pick for buyers who want effortless electric driving, regular software improvements and access to Tesla’s convenient charging network, though style-conscious shoppers should know it’s more about tech and efficiency than classic luxury.
details
@ Tesla, Inc.
@ Tesla, Inc.
@ Tesla, Inc.
@ Tesla, Inc.
MINI Aceman
Tesla Model Y
|
@ MINI / BMW Group Press
|
@ Tesla, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25500 - 36200 £
|
Price
34300 - 53100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14 - 16 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 16.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
303 - 405 km
|
Electric Range
534 - 622 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
38.5 - 49.2 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
64.5 - 85 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1720 - 1825 kg
|
Curb weight
1976 - 2108 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
Trunk capacity
822 L
|
|
Length
4079 mm
|
Length
4790 - 4797 mm
|
|
Width
1754 mm
|
Width
1921 mm
|
|
Height
1514 mm
|
Height
1611 - 1624 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1005 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2022 - 2138 L
|
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Payload
440 - 472 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
Power HP
299 - 627 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.5 - 7.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
201 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 493 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
Power kW
220 - 461 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
MINI
|
Brand
Tesla
|
Is the MINI Aceman offered with different drivetrains?
The MINI Aceman is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.