VS

MINI Aceman vs VW Polo comparison

Compare performance (258 HP vs 207 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 17,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Aceman or VW Polo?

MINI Aceman vs VW Polo: Key differences

MINI Aceman

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately more power
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

VW Polo

4.1 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • significantly lighter
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Aceman

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

VW Polo is considerably cheaper – starting at 17,300 £ , while the MINI Aceman costs 27,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,742 £.

Polo

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the MINI Aceman offers moderately more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 207 HP. That’s roughly 51 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Aceman is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.4 s, while the VW Polo takes 6.5 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MINI Aceman delivers marginally more torque with 350 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.

Aceman

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW Polo is significantly lighter – 1,143 kg compared to 1,720 kg. The difference is around 577 kg.

Looking at boot space, the VW Polo offers somewhat more boot space – 351 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 51 L.

When it comes to payload, the MINI Aceman carries moderately more – 530 kg compared to 457 kg. That’s a difference of about 73 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MINI Aceman holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,000
Aceman

MINI Aceman

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 184 - 258 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 309 - 355 km
details

Frequently compared as well

VW Polo
VW T-Cross
VS
The VW Polo is a nimble, wallet-friendly hatch that makes city driving and tight parking effortless, while the VW T-Cross trades the Polo’s sprightliness for SUV practicality — higher seating, a roomier boot and a more commanding road presence. Pick the Polo if you want cheap, lively motoring; …
VW Polo
VW Taigo
VS
The VW Polo is the sharp, no-nonsense hatchback that nails everyday practicality — nimble in town, economical to run and pleasantly composed on the motorway. The VW Taigo swaps a bit of luggage room and rear headroom for SUV flair, higher seating and a more eye-catching cabin, so pick the Polo for …
MINI Aceman
VW Polo

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MINI Aceman

The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.

details
P90545616_highRes_mini-aceman-se-04-20
P90545628_highRes_mini-aceman-se-04-20
P90547839_highRes_the-new-mini-aceman-

Reviews MINI Aceman

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
GEORGXRM
5 Jan 2026, 00:44:07

Amazing interior, sporty-funky exterior, great handles, good amount of power.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

VW Polo

The Polo is a small car with surprisingly grown-up refinement, delivering comfortable packaging, crisp handling and a build quality that punches above its class. For buyers who want a practical, fuss-free hatch that still feels a little premium, it’s a sensible, slightly cheeky choice you’ll enjoy every day.

details
DB2021AU00726_medium
DB2021AU00728_medium
DB2021AU00732_medium
DB2021AU00735_medium
DB2021AU00736_medium
DB2021AU00741_medium

Reviews VW Polo

4.1 (3 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

MINI Aceman
Renault R5
VS
The MINI Aceman feels like a posh city rocket — cheeky handling, premium finishes and a slick interior make it the choice for drivers who want style and go‑kart fun wrapped in crossover practicality. The Renault 5, by contrast, pares back the flash for retro charm, more usable space and a …
VW ID.3
VW Polo
VS
The VW ID.3 and VW Polo compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Ford Puma
VW Polo
VS
In the competitive segment of compact crossovers, the Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize excitement behind the wheel. On the other hand, the VW Polo offers a more traditional hatchback experience, characterized by its solid …
Renault Clio
VW Polo
VS
In the competitive supermini segment, the Renault Clio and VW Polo stand out for their blend of style, performance, and practicality. The Clio boasts a more dynamic design and an engaging driving experience, while the Polo is celebrated for its refined build quality and advanced technology …
Toyota Yaris
VW Polo
VS
In the compact car showdown, the Toyota Yaris and the VW Polo both make compelling cases, each boasting its own unique strengths. The Yaris shines with its impressive fuel efficiency and dependable reliability, making it a practical choice for everyday driving. On the other hand, the Polo …
Dacia Sandero
VW Polo
VS
In the battle of hatchbacks, the Dacia Sandero and VW Polo offer distinctive appeals. The Sandero stands out with its budget-friendly pricing and practical simplicity, making it an attractive option for cost-conscious drivers. In contrast, the VW Polo delivers a more refined driving experience and …
MINI Aceman
MINI Countryman
VS
In the latest showdown between the MINI Aceman and the MINI Countryman, drivers can expect a fresh take on the classic MINI experience. The Aceman offers a more compact design with an emphasis on electric performance, while the Countryman remains a versatile favorite with its spacious interior and …
VW Polo
VW T-Roc
VS
When comparing the VW Polo and the VW T-Roc, drivers will find distinct differences in style and functionality. The Polo excels with its compact design and agile handling, making it ideal for city driving, while the T-Roc offers a more rugged SUV look paired with a versatile interior and higher …
MINI Aceman
VW Polo

Costs and Consumption
Price
27,000 - 36,200 £
Price
17,300 - 30,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
49.2 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
116 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
Curb weight
1,143 - 1,378 kg
Trunk capacity
300 L
Trunk capacity
351 L
Length
4,079 mm
Length
-
Width
1,754 mm
Width
1,751 mm
Height
1,514 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,005 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
450 - 530 kg
Payload
432 - 457 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
Power HP
80 - 207 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 15.6 s
Max Speed
200 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
Torque
93 - 320 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
Power kW
59 - 152 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
MINI
Brand
VW
What drive types are available for the MINI Aceman?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.