@ MINI / BMW Group Press
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VS

MINI Countryman vs VW T-Cross – Which model is better for everyday use?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Countryman or VW T-Cross?

Countryman @ MINI / BMW Group Press

MINI Countryman vs VW T-Cross: A Clash of Compact SUVs

In the world of compact SUVs, the 2024 MINI Countryman and VW T-Cross are turning heads with their distinct features and impressive capabilities. While both vehicles offer versatility and practicality, they cater to slightly different tastes and preferences. Let's delve into the technical aspects, performance, and innovative features of these two automotive marvels.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Performance and Power: A Range to Suit Every Need

The MINI Countryman is known for its wide array of engine options, including petrol, diesel, mild hybrid, and an fully electric variant. With horsepower ranging from 163 to an imposing 313 HP, drivers can enjoy a spirited ride whether they choose the front-wheel or all-wheel drive option. The electric version offers a commendable range of up to 462 km, making it a great choice for eco-conscious drivers.

On the other hand, the VW T-Cross stays true to the petrol route with engines delivering between 95 to 150 HP. Exclusively front-wheel drive, it offers a manual and a dual-clutch automatic gearbox, striking a balance between efficiency and drivability. While the T-Cross might not match the outright power of the Countryman, it provides adequate punch for urban driving and open highways, with acceleration from 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.4 seconds.

Countryman @ MINI / BMW Group Press

Fuel Efficiency: Balancing Performance and Economy

When it comes to fuel consumption, the MINI Countryman achieves between 4.6 and 7.8 L/100km depending on the chosen powertrain, with the electric version consuming around 15.7-16.8 kWh/100km. These figures position the Countryman as an efficient yet powerful option within its segment.

The VW T-Cross remains slightly more consistent in its fuel economy, consuming between 5.6 to 6 L/100km. This consistent fuel efficiency, along with its practicality, makes the T-Cross a smart choice for city-goers who prioritize cost-effective driving.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Space and Practicality: Comfort Meets Functionality

In terms of dimensions, the MINI Countryman is the larger of the two, measuring 4445 mm in length, providing ample space for passengers and cargo. With a trunk capacity of up to 505 liters, it's designed to accommodate everything from groceries to weekend getaways.

The VW T-Cross offers a slightly more compact form at 4127 mm in length, with a trunk capacity of 455 liters. This makes it better suited for navigating tight city streets while still offering sufficient storage for everyday needs.

Countryman @ MINI / BMW Group Press

Innovation and Design: Modern Flair with Classic Roots

The MINI Countryman carries forward the iconic styling of the MINI brand, blending classic elements with modern features. Its advanced technological offerings and customizable options make it a compelling choice for those who enjoy a personalized driving experience.

VW's T-Cross, on the other hand, appeals with its straightforward design and practical features tailored for urban lifestyles. While it may not boast the extensive tech features of the Countryman, its user-friendly interface and design simplicity are major draws for many drivers.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

The Verdict: Which SUV Suits You?

Choosing between the MINI Countryman and VW T-Cross ultimately boils down to personal priorities. For those seeking a versatile vehicle with a wide range of power and eco-friendly options, along with larger dimensions, the Countryman stands out. Meanwhile, the T-Cross appeals to drivers who prioritize efficiency, practicality, and nimble city maneuverability.

Both the MINI Countryman and VW T-Cross offer impressive packages, ensuring that regardless of choice, drivers will enjoy a capable and enjoyable compact SUV experience.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Countryman @ MINI / BMW Group Press

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

VW T-Cross has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21100 £, while the MINI Countryman costs 31500 £. That’s a price difference of around 10465 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: MINI Countryman manages with 4.60 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the VW T-Cross with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.80 L per 100 km.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MINI Countryman has a clearly edge – offering 313 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 163 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Countryman is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the VW T-Cross takes 8.40 s. That’s about 3 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the MINI Countryman performs slightly better – reaching 250 km/h, while the VW T-Cross tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 50 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: MINI Countryman pulls convincingly stronger with 494 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 244 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, VW T-Cross is noticeable lighter – 1267 kg compared to 1620 kg. The difference is around 353 kg.

In terms of boot space, the MINI Countryman offers minimal more room – 505 L compared to 455 L. That’s a difference of about 50 L.

In maximum load capacity, the MINI Countryman performs to a small extent better – up to 1530 L, which is about 249 L more than the VW T-Cross.

When it comes to payload, MINI Countryman slight takes the win – 500 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 20 kg.

Who wins the race?

The MINI Countryman proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
MINI Countryman is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £31,500
Countryman @ MINI / BMW Group Press

MINI Countryman

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Electric, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 163 - 313 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.6 - 7.8 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.7 - 16.8 kWh
  • Electric Range : 432 - 462 km
details

MINI Countryman

The MINI Countryman turns the cheeky charm of a classic MINI into a proper all-rounder, blending playful styling with surprisingly usable space for everyday life. It still grins at city lights but will happily tackle muddy lanes, perfect for buyers who want character without sacrificing practicality.

details
P90484775_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count @ MINI / BMW Group Press
P90484787_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count @ MINI / BMW Group Press
P90484779_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count @ MINI / BMW Group Press
P90454013_highRes_mini-cooper-s-countr @ MINI / BMW Group Press

VW T-Cross

4 (1)
rate

The VW T-Cross turns everyday practicality into a style statement, offering a roomy-feeling cabin, clever storage and playful design that suits town life and family duties alike. On the road it's composed and relaxed, rewarding buyers who want the raised seating and confident presence of an SUV without the weighty compromises.

details
DB2021AU01108_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2021AU01109_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2021AU01111_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2021AU01114_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2021AU01120_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2021AU01124_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Top Car Comparisons

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Skoda Kamiq and VW T-Cross stand out with their distinctive styles and practicality. While both models share the same platform, the Kamiq offers a slightly more spacious interior, making it an excellent choice for families. On the other hand, the …
@ Citroën / Stellantis Media
Citroen C3 Aircross
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Cross
VS
Citroen C3 Aircross and VW T-Cross go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
MINI Countryman
VW T-Cross
Countryman @ MINI / BMW Group Press
T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Costs and Consumption
Price
31500 - 45300 £
Price
21100 - 31500 £
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7.8 L
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
15.7 - 16.8 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
432 - 462 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
64.60 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 177 g/km
co2
124 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 54 L
Fuel tank capacity
40 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1620 - 2075 kg
Curb weight
1267 - 1338 kg
Trunk capacity
450 - 505 L
Trunk capacity
455 L
Length
4444 - 4447 mm
Length
4127 mm
Width
1843 mm
Width
1784 mm
Height
1635 - 1661 mm
Height
1573 mm
Max trunk capacity
1450 - 1530 L
Max trunk capacity
1281 L
Payload
460 - 500 kg
Payload
463 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 313 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Max Speed
170 - 250 km/h
Max Speed
180 - 200 km/h
Torque
250 - 494 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
120 - 230 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1499 - 1998 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
MINI
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Polo
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the VW Polo and the VW T-Cross cater to different driving needs while maintaining Volkswagen's signature quality. The Polo, a beloved supermini, offers a sleek and nimble ride ideal for urban environments, boasting efficiency and precision handling. On the other hand, …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Cross
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Ford Puma showcases a sporty design and dynamic handling, appealing to those who crave a fun driving experience. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross emphasizes practicality and interior space, making it a top choice for families seeking comfort on the road. Both …
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Mokka
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Opel Mokka and VW T-Cross stand out with their distinct styles and features. The Mokka impresses with its bold design and cutting-edge technology, while the T-Cross offers a more practical interior and a comfortable driving experience. Ultimately, …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Captur
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Renault Captur and VW T-Cross both stand out with unique offerings. The Captur impresses with its stylish design and comfortable ride, backed by a range of efficient engines that suit urban lifestyles. Meanwhile, the T-Cross delivers solid German …
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Arona
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the SEAT Arona and VW T-Cross offer distinct personalities while sharing a similar platform. The Arona embodies a sporty spirit with its dynamic styling and vibrant color options, appealing to a younger audience, while the T-Cross emphasizes practicality …
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
Jeep Avenger
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Jeep Avenger stands out with its rugged styling and off-road capabilities, appealing to adventure enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross offers a more refined approach with its sleek design and practical interior, making it an ideal choice for urban …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Explorer EV
@ MINI / BMW Group Press
MINI Countryman
VS
The all-new Ford Explorer EV emerges as a formidable contender in the electric SUV market, offering impressive range and spacious interiors, ideal for family adventures. On the other hand, the MINI Countryman, now with an electrified twist, charms with its iconic design and agile handling, making …
@ MINI / BMW Group Press
MINI Countryman
smart #5
VS
The MINI Countryman and smart #5 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
What drive types are available for the MINI Countryman?

The MINI Countryman is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.