VS

Mitsubishi ASX vs Suzuki Swace comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 140 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 31,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi ASX or Suzuki Swace?

Mitsubishi ASX vs Suzuki Swace: Key differences

Mitsubishi ASX

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • moderately more power
  • only slightly more efficient
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit lighter
details

Suzuki Swace

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ASX

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mitsubishi ASX is substantially cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Suzuki Swace costs 31,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,457 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi ASX uses 4.3 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Suzuki Swace with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.

Swace

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi ASX offers moderately more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 140 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi ASX is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 8.9 s, while the Suzuki Swace takes 9.4 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

ASX

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is a bit lighter – 1,296 kg compared to 1,475 kg. The difference is around 179 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Suzuki Swace offers moderately more boot space – 596 L compared to 484 L. That’s a difference of about 112 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mitsubishi ASX carries somewhat more – 445 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 85 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi ASX is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,400
ASX

Mitsubishi ASX

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.3 - 6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla
VS
Think of this as a family-friendly duel: the Suzuki Swace, a sensible, value-focused take on Toyota’s proven hybrid estate, versus the Toyota Corolla, the familiar all-rounder that’s been refining the formula for years. Which one gives you smarter value, a more engaging drive and lower running …
Mitsubishi ASX
Suzuki Vitara
VS
Comparing the ASX and Vitara helps buyers choose between two compact SUVs with different strengths: the ASX leans toward comfort and value, while the Vitara emphasizes nimble handling and fuel efficiency. I’ll run through the key differences in space, safety, economy and driving feel so you can …
Mitsubishi ASX
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi ASX

The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.

details
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_front_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_rear_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_interior_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_Overview-Trunk_open_low

Reviews Mitsubishi ASX

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
Jaca
15 Apr 2026, 15:55:53

A super-sporty compact crossover — raised ground clearance, drives light and enjoyable, very pleasant, well-insulated interior. Perfect size of car for me.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Suzuki Swace

The Suzuki Swace is a pragmatic estate that swaps showy design for roomy practicality and a quiet, comfortable ride that suits everyday family life. It won't thrill the enthusiast, but its sensible charm, dependable build and clever packaging make it a smart pick for buyers who want fuss-free usability rather than headline-grabbing performance.

details
SUZUKI KARTE-1849_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1774_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1627_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-2074_sRGB
Suzuki_Swace_2

Reviews Suzuki Swace

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
Sjors
16 Apr 2026, 11:06:18

I have the Swace — it drives much more frugally than you state: 1:23. A downside as you get older is that getting in, and especially getting out, becomes harder because of the low seating position. The advantage of the low seat is better fuel economy. 16‑inch wheels are also likely to be more economical than larger ones. Rear legroom is poor. It would be nice if the rear bench were on rails like the Renault Twingo. Shrinking the boot would give more rear legroom. The 2014 Toyota Prius was the last to offer lots of rear legroom — after that it’s been rubbish.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mitsubishi ASX
Mitsubishi Grandis
VS
Comparing the Mitsubishi ASX and the Mitsubishi Grandis helps you decide whether you need a compact crossover that’s easy in town or a roomy MPV designed for family duty. I’ll point out the key differences in space, driving character, fuel economy and running costs so you can quickly see which fits …
Mitsubishi ASX
Renault Captur
VS
Choosing between the Mitsubishi ASX and the Renault Captur comes down to whether you prioritize straightforward, durable value and simple packaging (ASX) or a more stylish, configurable small SUV with clever cabin packaging and tech (Captur). I’ll quickly compare how they stack up for space, …
Dacia Duster
Mitsubishi ASX
VS
Unsure whether the Dacia Duster or the Mitsubishi ASX is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Honda HR-V
Mitsubishi ASX
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Honda HR-V and Mitsubishi ASX both bring unique strengths to the table. The HR-V shines with its sleek design and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a standout choice for urban drivers who value style and economy. On the other hand, the ASX offers robust …
Mitsubishi ASX
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive realm of compact crossovers, the Mitsubishi ASX and Suzuki S-Cross offer distinct value propositions for discerning buyers. The ASX impresses with its robust design and spacious interior, making it a practical choice for families and adventure seekers alike. Meanwhile, the Suzuki …
Mitsubishi ASX
Toyota RAV4
VS
Unsure whether the Mitsubishi ASX or the Toyota RAV4 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-30
Mitsubishi ASX
VS
The Mazda CX-30 and Mitsubishi ASX compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mitsubishi ASX
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mitsubishi ASX and Nissan Qashqai compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mitsubishi ASX
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,400 - 32,500 £
Price
31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
99 - 137 g/km
co2
102 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
43 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,296 - 1,493 kg
Curb weight
1,475 kg
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Trunk capacity
596 L
Length
-
Length
4,655 mm
Width
1,797 mm
Width
1,790 mm
Height
-
Height
1,460 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,606 L
Payload
397 - 445 kg
Payload
360 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Power HP
140 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Power kW
103 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
1,798 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Suzuki
Is the Mitsubishi ASX offered with different drivetrains?

The Mitsubishi ASX is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.