@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Mitsubishi ASX – Which model is better for everyday use?

Two cars, one duel: Mazda CX-30 meets Mitsubishi ASX.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mitsubishi ASX has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20600 £, while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £. That’s a price difference of around 4672 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi ASX manages with 4.40 L and is therefore noticeable more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 1.30 L per 100 km.

ASX @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 has a to a small extent edge – offering 186 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 28 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the Mitsubishi ASX takes 8.50 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs somewhat better – reaching 204 km/h, while the Mitsubishi ASX tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 24 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mitsubishi ASX pulls slightly stronger with 270 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is slightly lighter – 1296 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 159 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers a bit more room – 484 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 54 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mitsubishi ASX performs slightly better – up to 1596 L, which is about 190 L more than the Mazda CX-30.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 hardly perceptible takes the win – 496 kg compared to 449 kg. That’s a difference of about 47 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mitsubishi ASX shows itself to be performs better in key areas and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £20,600
ASX @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation

Mitsubishi ASX

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 91 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 6 L
details

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1)
rate

The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.

details
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_front_variation_low @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_rear_variation_low @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_interior_low @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_Overview-Trunk_open_low @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. …
Mazda CX-30
Mitsubishi ASX
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
ASX @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
20600 - 32500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
99 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
48 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1296 - 1493 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4239 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1797 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1575 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
1458 - 1596 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
397 - 449 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
91 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 14 s
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
168 - 180 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
160 - 270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
67 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1789 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mitsubishi

Similar Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and Mazda CX-5 both showcase the brand's signature blend of style and performance. While the CX-30 offers a more agile driving experience with its smaller footprint, the CX-5 impresses with its spacious interior and powerful engine options. Ultimately, …
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
The CUPRA Formentor and Mazda CX-30 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Juke
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Juke, the CX-30 stands out with its refined interior and superior driving dynamics, making it a prime choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and sporty driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke offers a bold design and innovative features, …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Mokka
VS
The Mazda CX-30 and Opel Mokka compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.