VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Mitsubishi ASX - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (186 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (25200 £ vs 21400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Mitsubishi ASX?

Mazda CX-30

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate

Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mitsubishi ASX has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21400 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3814 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi ASX manages with 4.40 L and is therefore noticeable more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 1.30 L per 100 km.

ASX

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 has a to a small extent edge – offering 186 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 28 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the Mitsubishi ASX takes 8.90 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mitsubishi ASX pulls minimal stronger with 245 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 5 Nm difference.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is slightly lighter – 1296 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 159 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers a bit more room – 484 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 54 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 a bit takes the win – 496 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 51 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi ASX has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Mazda CX-30
Mitsubishi ASX

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £21,400
ASX

Mitsubishi ASX

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 6 L
details

Mazda CX-30

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.

details
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_front_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_rear_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_interior_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_Overview-Trunk_open_low

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Mazda CX-30 feels like a little premium driver’s car with sharper handling, a beautifully put-together interior and just the sort of polish that makes daily drives more enjoyable, while the Toyota Yaris Cross leans hard into practicality and hybrid efficiency for city life. Pick the CX-30 if …
Mazda CX-30
Mitsubishi ASX

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
21400 - 32500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
99 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
48 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1296 - 1493 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Length
-
Length
4239 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1797 mm
Height
-
Height
1575 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1458 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
397 - 445 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
1199 - 1789 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mitsubishi

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers …
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach with its spacious cabin and impressive fuel …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Mitsubishi ASX
Renault Captur
VS
In this exciting comparison between the Mitsubishi Outlander and the Renault Koleos, both models showcase their strengths in versatility and design. The Outlander impresses with its robust performance and spacious interior, making it an ideal choice for families and adventure seekers alike. …
Mitsubishi ASX
Suzuki Vitara
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mitsubishi ASX and Suzuki Vitara stand out with their distinctive styling and practicality. While the ASX offers a spacious interior and a reputation for reliability, the Vitara impresses with its off-road capabilities and zippy handling. Ultimately, …
Honda Civic
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Honda Civic and Mazda CX-30 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mazda CX-30
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and the VW T-Roc both bring distinct flavors to the table. The Mazda CX-30 is celebrated for its elegant design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a luxurious feel with its high-quality interior and impressive handling. Meanwhile, the …
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.