Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Toyota C-HR?
The compact SUV market is vibrant and full of options, but two models that stand out are the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota C-HR. Both vehicles offer a mix of style, performance, and innovative technology. In this comparison, we will explore the technical aspects, features, and innovations of each model to help you decide which vehicle is the right fit for you.
The Mazda CX-30 showcases a sleek and elegant design that reflects the brand’s Kodo design philosophy. With a length of 4,395 mm and a width of 1,795 mm, it offers a robust stance while maintaining a graceful profile. The CX-30 has a height of 1,540 mm, providing a spacious interior and good headroom for passengers.
On the other hand, the Toyota C-HR presents a more dynamic and aggressive look, characterized by its sculpted body lines and distinctive silhouette. The C-HR measures 4,362 mm in length and 1,832 mm in width, standing at a height of either 1,558 mm or 1,564 mm depending on the variant. This design emphasis grants the C-HR a sporty edge that is particularly appealing to younger consumers.
When it comes to engine options, the Mazda CX-30 offers petrol mild-hybrid choices, with power outputs ranging from 140 HP to 186 HP depending on the variant. It has commendable torque figures of 238 Nm and 240 Nm, coupled with an automatic or manual gearbox, and an impressive 0-100 km/h acceleration time ranging from 8.3 to 10.3 seconds.
The Toyota C-HR, in contrast, features a combination of full hybrid and plugin hybrid engines, providing power outputs from 140 HP up to 223 HP, providing a more varied range for the performance-oriented driver. The hybrid variants present outstanding fuel efficiency, with consumption figures as low as 4.7 L/100 km. The C-HR's acceleration times stand from 7.4 seconds to 9.9 seconds, ensuring engaging performance on the road.
Fuel consumption is a crucial aspect of any vehicle purchase. The Mazda CX-30 has a range of consumption figures depending on the engine choice, averaging around 5.7 to 6.6 L/100 km for everyday driving. With a fuel tank capacity of 51L, the CX-30 is useful for longer journeys with fewer stops at the pump.
In comparison, the Toyota C-HR excels in fuel efficiency, particularly with its hybrid variants that can achieve consumption ratings as low as 4.7 L/100 km. Its smaller 43L fuel tank capacity may mean more frequent stops, but its impressive hybrid technology compensates with long-range capability on electric power alone, boasting an electric range of up to 67 km.
Interior comfort is paramount in this segment, and both models offer spacious, well-designed cabins. The Mazda CX-30 comfortably seats five passengers and features a trunk capacity of 430L, which is slightly roomier than the C-HR's 424L (depending on the variant). The interior is lined with high-quality materials, showcasing Mazda’s commitment to craftsmanship.
The Toyota C-HR also seats five but offers slightly less space with a trunk capacity ranging from 350L to 447L. Despite this, the C-HR’s interior is designed with a focus on modernity and minimalistic aesthetics, enhanced by a futuristic dashboard layout that integrates advanced technology seamlessly.
Both vehicles prioritize safety, equipped with a range of advanced safety technologies. The Mazda CX-30 features an array of driver assistance systems including adaptive cruise control, lane departure warning, and automatic emergency braking, making it a strong contender in safety ratings.
The Toyota C-HR equally invests in safety, featuring Toyota’s Safety Sense suite in its standard package across most trims. It includes features like pre-collision systems, lane tracing assist, and adaptive cruise control, making it a compelling choice for safety-conscious buyers.
In the head-to-head comparison of the Mazda CX-30 and Toyota C-HR, both vehicles bring their unique strengths to the compact SUV market. The CX-30 fascinates with its powerful engine options, stylish design, and spacious interior, while the C-HR leads with its fuel-efficient hybrid technology, sporty aesthetics, and advanced safety features. Ultimately, your decision will come down to your personal preferences regarding performance, efficiency, and design. Whichever option you choose, you're bound to enjoy a remarkable driving experience in these two exceptional SUVs.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mazda CX-30 has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Toyota C-HR costs 29100 £. That’s a price difference of around 3900 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota C-HR manages with 0.80 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 4.90 L per 100 km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR has a slightly edge – offering 223 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 37 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs somewhat better – reaching 204 km/h, while the Toyota C-HR tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 24 km/h.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is barely noticeable lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1505 kg. The difference is around 50 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Toyota C-HR offers barely noticeable more room – 447 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 17 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-30 performs slightly better – up to 1406 L, which is about 251 L more than the Toyota C-HR.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 somewhat takes the win – 496 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 71 kg.
The Toyota C-HR proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Toyota C-HR is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
The Toyota C-HR cuts a striking figure with its angular styling and coupe-like profile, so you’ll never go unnoticed in the supermarket car park. It balances everyday practicality with a nimble, city-friendly personality, making routine commutes feel a touch more fun without asking for forgiveness.
details
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25200 - 36800 £
|
Price
29100 - 42800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.8 - 5.1 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
co2
17 - 115 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
43 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
|
Curb weight
1505 - 1755 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
|
|
Length
4395 mm
|
Length
4362 mm
|
|
Width
1795 mm
|
Width
1832 mm
|
|
Height
1540 mm
|
Height
1558 - 1564 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1076 - 1155 L
|
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
|
Max Speed
175 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1798 - 1987 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Toyota
|
The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España