VS

Mitsubishi ASX vs Suzuki Vitara comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (21,800 £ vs 23,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi ASX or Suzuki Vitara?

Mitsubishi ASX vs Suzuki Vitara: Key differences

Mitsubishi ASX

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • markedly more efficient
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

Suzuki Vitara

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more power
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

ASX

Mitsubishi ASX VS Suzuki Vitara — calm refinement versus honest practicality

Mitsubishi ASX and Suzuki Vitara take very different approaches to the same compact‑SUV brief: the ASX pushes for calm, hybrid‑led refinement and flexible everyday usability, while the Vitara trades polish for lightness, directness and a no‑nonsense layout. The ASX leans on quieter low‑speed manners, a longer warranty and a sliding rear bench to solve real‑world packing headaches; the Vitara answers with a lighter footprint, crisper initial response and the rare option of all‑wheel drive in this class. That divergence frames most decisions here — comfort and everyday finesse on one side, simplicity and agility on the other. Read on to see how those philosophical differences play out in cabin feel, long‑distance comfort, city usability and practical family life.

Vitara

Cabin feel and perceived quality: modern polish vs. pragmatic simplicity

The Mitsubishi ASX feels a step more contemporary inside with cleaner lines, better‑fitting panels and an interior that aims for a slightly more premium impression than the Suzuki Vitara. The Vitara keeps things deliberately simple: many hard plastics and tactile knobs that favour usability over show, which some will find refreshingly honest and others a little dated. Infotainment is a clear contrast — the ASX has newer integration and physical climate controls that make routine adjustments easier, but its touchscreen can sometimes lag; the Vitara’s screen is capable but buries controls and locks some menus while driving. So the ASX wins on perceived finish and connectivity, while the Vitara wins on tactile, intuitive controls for drivers who prefer buttons over menus.

ASX

Comfort and long‑distance behaviour: civilised cruiser versus lively roadholder

On long runs the Mitsubishi ASX generally feels more civilised thanks to hybrid tuning that tames low‑speed vibrations and a cabin that isolates road and drivetrain noise at typical cruising speeds. The ASX’s suspension is comfort‑biased, soaking up long stretches well though it can feel a touch firmer over sharp ridges, and its seats offer cushioning rather than sporty support. The Suzuki Vitara, being lighter and more direct, is more agile on country roads and gives a more engaging steering feel, but wind and engine noise are more noticeable on the motorway and the seats are less supportive for day‑long drives. In short, choose the ASX if motorway serenity and relaxed long‑distance comfort matter; pick the Vitara if you want a nimble, engaging companion for B‑roads and winter lanes, accepting a louder, less cushioned ride on trips.

Vitara

City friendliness and everyday usability: quiet hybrid finesse vs. clear visibility and immediacy

The Mitsubishi ASX has been tuned for urban life — its hybrid low‑speed manners, parking aids and sliding rear bench make school runs and shopping trips noticeably easier and less stressful. Suzuki Vitara is every bit as city‑competent thanks to light steering, wide glass areas and a small turning circle that make manoeuvring and parking effortless, and its physical controls reduce distraction when you’re juggling bags or kids. Where they differ is feel: the ASX delivers a calmer, quieter stop‑start experience, while some Vitara powertrain variants feel more immediate but can be jerky in heavy traffic. Thus, the ASX favours a relaxed, fuss‑free urban routine; the Vitara favours directness and visibility for drivers who want to feel in control at low speeds.

ASX

Practicality and cargo: adaptable loading versus compact honesty

The Mitsubishi ASX is the more versatile partner for real‑world hauling thanks to a larger, more adaptable boot area and a rear bench that can slide to prioritise passengers or luggage. The Suzuki Vitara’s luggage area is more modest and certain hybrid versions reduce usable volume further, which is felt when fitting a stroller or several suitcases. Both cabin layouts seat four adults comfortably, but the ASX’s flexible load options make family weekends and DIY trips simpler to manage without wrestling with awkward packing. Take care with electrified variants, though — opting for certain hybrid versions can eat into boot practicality, so check the specific combination if cargo is a priority.

Vitara

Buyer fit and how to choose before the specs section

If you want a quieter, more refined daily experience with clever interior flexibility and the reassurance of an extended warranty, start your test drive with the Mitsubishi ASX; it favours comfort, efficient urban driving and family practicality. If you prefer a lighter, more straightforward car with excellent visibility, easier parking, optional all‑wheel drive and a driving feel that’s more immediate, the Suzuki Vitara will suit you better. The decision comes down to a fundamental trade‑off: ASX for comfort and polished everyday usability, Vitara for directness, simplicity and occasional off‑piste confidence. Below this editorial comparison you’ll find the technical breakdown that explains why those trade‑offs exist and helps you match engines, cargo and features to your real needs.

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Vitara take different approaches to the compact SUV segment: the S-Cross leans towards comfort, refinement and value, while the Vitara offers a more rugged look and a livelier driving character. I’ll outline their strengths in space, ride, economy and equipment to …
Suzuki Vitara
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Suzuki Vitara and the Toyota Yaris Cross both aim at buyers wanting compact SUVs, but they take different approaches: the Vitara leans toward rugged simplicity and practical space, while the Yaris Cross focuses on urban refinement and hybrid efficiency. I’ll compare their practicality, driving …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ASX

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mitsubishi ASX is marginally cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Suzuki Vitara costs 23,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,809 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi ASX uses 4.3 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Suzuki Vitara with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.

Vitara

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Suzuki Vitara offers somewhat more power – delivering 184 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 26 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Suzuki Vitara is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Mitsubishi ASX takes 8.9 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Suzuki Vitara delivers markedly more torque with 307 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 62 Nm more.

ASX

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is barely lighter – 1,255 kg compared to 1,296 kg. The difference is around 41 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers noticeably more boot space – 484 L compared to 375 L. That’s a difference of about 109 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mitsubishi ASX carries very slightly more – 445 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 20 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Suzuki Vitara is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,600
Vitara

Suzuki Vitara

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 110 - 184 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 344 - 426 km
details
Mitsubishi ASX
Suzuki Vitara

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi ASX

The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.

details
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_front_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_rear_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_interior_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_Overview-Trunk_open_low

Reviews Mitsubishi ASX

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
Jaca
15 Apr 2026, 15:55:53

A super-sporty compact crossover — raised ground clearance, drives light and enjoyable, very pleasant, well-insulated interior. Perfect size of car for me.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Suzuki Vitara

The Suzuki Vitara is a practical compact SUV that balances a comfortable, composed ride with easy-to-live-with interior space, making it well suited for daily driving and weekend getaways. It's widely praised for reliable engineering and sensible running costs, offering straightforward value to buyers who want a no-nonsense, economical crossover.

details
Suzuki_Vitara_002
Suzuki_Vitara_020
Suzuki_Vitara_039
Suzuki_Vitara_023
Suzuki_Vitara_004
Vitara_9

Reviews Suzuki Vitara

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
Jolanta
4 Feb 2026, 09:37:41

A very pleasant car for an affordable price. The only downside is poorly soundproofed doors and windows.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Polet
14 Jan 2026, 00:08:10

Proven reliability — it’s sold on every continent, and a real pleasure as a 4x4.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alejandro
15 Nov 2025, 18:50:42

After trying both, I chose the Vitara for everyday use. In my view, its balance of performance, quality and price is superior.

Frequently compared as well

Opel Frontera
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Opel Frontera and Suzuki Vitara are both compact SUVs that appeal to buyers who want a capable, practical vehicle, but they take different approaches — the Frontera leans toward a sturdier, more spacious package while the Vitara focuses on light off-road ability, efficiency and city-friendly …
Suzuki Vitara
Suzuki Across
VS
Here’s a matchup: the compact, city-friendly Suzuki Vitara squares off against the RAV4-based Suzuki Across to settle whether you want sprightly urban agility or long-range hybrid practicality. The Vitara tempts with a cheeky drive and sensible price, while the Across answers with superior fuel …
Dacia Duster
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Dacia Duster is known for no-nonsense value and roomy practicality, while the Suzuki Vitara offers a more polished drive and a stronger equipment list. This comparison will highlight where each SUV shines — from running costs and interior space to technology and on-road manners — so you can …
Skoda Kamiq
Suzuki Vitara
VS
Deciding between the Skoda Kamiq and the Suzuki Vitara? This quick, no-nonsense comparison focuses on real-world space, practicality, running costs and driving feel to show which crossover suits your everyday needs.
Suzuki Swift
Suzuki Vitara
VS
Choosing between the Suzuki Swift and the Suzuki Vitara comes down to whether you want a nimble city hatchback or a roomier compact SUV. The Swift excels with light steering, efficient running costs and easy parking, while the Vitara offers higher seating, more cargo space and light off-road …
Suzuki Vitara
Renault R4
VS
Suzuki Vitara and Renault R4 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Suzuki Vitara
Toyota Urban Cruiser
VS
Unsure whether the Suzuki Vitara or the Toyota Urban Cruiser is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Hyundai Tucson
Suzuki Vitara
VS
In the bustling world of compact SUVs, the Hyundai Tucson and Suzuki Vitara both offer appealing options for discerning drivers. The Tucson stands out with its sleek design and advanced technology features, catering to those seeking a more luxurious driving experience. Meanwhile, the Vitara excels …
Mitsubishi ASX
Suzuki Vitara

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,800 - 32,700 £
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
99 - 136 g/km
co2
0 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,296 - 1,493 kg
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Trunk capacity
310 - 375 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,797 mm
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
397 - 445 kg
Payload
395 - 425 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Suzuki
Is the Mitsubishi ASX offered with different drivetrains?

The Mitsubishi ASX is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.