Mitsubishi VS Suzuki

VS

In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mitsubishi ASX and Suzuki Vitara stand out with their distinctive styling and practicality. While the ASX offers a spacious interior and a reputation for reliability, the Vitara impresses with its off-road capabilities and zippy handling. Ultimately, choosing between these two models comes down to whether you prioritize everyday comfort or adventurous versatility.

Mitsubishi

details

Suzuki

details

Introduction to the Compact SUV Battle

The compact SUV segment has become increasingly popular among drivers looking for a blend of practicality, comfort, and performance. Two notable contenders in this category are the Mitsubishi ASX and the Suzuki Vitara. Both vehicles offer unique features and technological innovations that cater to a wide range of preferences. This article dives deep into a comparison of the Mitsubishi ASX and Suzuki Vitara in terms of technical specifications, design, and innovations.

Powertrain Options and Performance

The Mitsubishi ASX offers a diverse lineup of engines, catering to a variety of driving preferences. Engine options include petrol, petrol mild hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV), and full hybrid variants. The power output ranges from 91 HP to 158 HP with torque figures peaking at 270 Nm. The ASX also provides different transmission options including manual, automated manual, and an automatic gearbox, along with front-wheel drive as standard.

In contrast, the Suzuki Vitara focuses primarily on petrol MHEV and full hybrid variants, producing between 116 HP and 129 HP with a torque output of 235 Nm. It offers both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations, allowing customers to choose based on their driving needs and conditions. The Vitara also provides a choice between manual and automatic transmissions, ensuring a smooth driving experience.

Efficiency and Fuel Consumption

When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Mitsubishi ASX shows promising figures, with consumption ranging from 4.7 L/100km to 6 L/100km, depending on the engine variant and driving conditions. The ASX's CO2 emissions range from 107 g/km to 135 g/km, which is competitive within its class.

On the other hand, the Suzuki Vitara demonstrates remarkable efficiency with fuel consumption as low as 5 L/100km to 5.6 L/100km. Its CO2 emissions are also commendably low, varying from 113 g/km to 129 g/km. This enhances the Vitara's appeal for environmentally-conscious consumers.

Dimensions and Interior Comfort

Dimensionally, the Mitsubishi ASX measures 4239 mm in length, 1797 mm in width, and 1575 mm in height, providing a spacious interior. It can accommodate up to 5 passengers and offers a trunk capacity of 484 L, making it practical for everyday use.

Meanwhile, the Suzuki Vitara comes in slightly smaller, measuring 4185 mm in length and 1775 mm in width, with a height of 1595 mm. Despite its smaller dimensions, it also comfortably seats 5 passengers; however, its trunk capacity is lower at 375 L. While this means slightly less cargo space, the Vitara's design maximizes interior comfort.

Safety Features and Innovations

Both the Mitsubishi ASX and Suzuki Vitara have equipped themselves with industry-standard safety features to ensure the protection of their passengers. The ASX has a range of advanced technologies designed to enhance its safety profile, including multiple airbags, stability control systems, and various driver-assist features, helping to mitigate potential hazards on the road.

Similarly, the Suzuki Vitara comes with a suite of advanced safety technologies, including adaptive cruise control, lane departure warning, and collision prevention systems. Its reputation for reliability and safety further cements its standing in the market.

Conclusion: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

In the battle of the compact SUVs, the Mitsubishi ASX and Suzuki Vitara both present compelling cases. The ASX offers more variety in its powertrains and a larger trunk capacity. Conversely, the Vitara excels in fuel efficiency and boasts sophisticated safety features. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles will come down to individual preferences regarding performance, space, and safety features. Both deliver exceptional value in today’s competitive automotive landscape.

Mitsubishi
Suzuki

Costs and Consumption

Price
about 20600 - 32000 £
Price
about 23200 - 30400 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
0.6 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
107 - 135 g/km
co2
113 - 129 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
Fuel tank capacity
47 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1296 - 1501 kg
Curb weight
1255 - 1395 kg
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Trunk capacity
289 - 375 L
Length
4239 mm
Length
4185 mm
Width
1797 mm
Width
1775 mm
Height
1575 mm
Height
1595 mm
Payload
399 - 449 kg
Payload
375 - 395 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
91 - 158 HP
Power HP
116 - 129 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 14 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.5 - 12.7 s
Max Speed
168 - 180 km/h
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
Torque
160 - 270 Nm
Torque
235 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
67 - 116 kW
Power kW
85 - 95 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1598 cm3
Engine capacity
1373 - 1462 cm3
Top speed
168 - 180 km/h
Top speed
180 - 190 km/h

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Suzuki

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.