Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España
ASX
VS
Mitsubishi ASX vs Suzuki S-Cross comparison
Compare performance (158 HP vs 110 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 21,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi ASX or Suzuki S-Cross?
Mitsubishi ASX vs Suzuki S-Cross: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
S-Cross
A Clash of Compact SUVs: Mitsubishi ASX vs. Suzuki S-Cross
In the ever-expanding world of compact SUVs, the Mitsubishi ASX and Suzuki S-Cross stand out as formidable contenders. Both models cater to drivers seeking performance, practicality, and modern technology, but they take different approaches to achieve that balance. Let's delve into the technical specifications, features, and innovations that define these two vehicles.
ASX
Engine Variants and Performance
The Mitsubishi ASX offers a variety of engine options for 2024, including petrol, petrol MHEV, and full hybrid variants. Notably, the power outputs range from 91 HP to a more robust 158 HP depending on the engine configuration. The ASX's torque figures reach a peak of 270 Nm, allowing for competitive acceleration, with some models achieving 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.5 seconds.
On the other hand, the Suzuki S-Cross also showcases a diverse range of engine choices, primarily focusing on full hybrid and petrol MHEV types. Its power output varies, topping at 129 HP with a torque of 235 Nm. The S-Cross is no slouch either, achieving 0-100 km/h in a respectable 9.5 seconds. While the ASX emphasizes higher horsepower, the S-Cross provides a more balanced torque delivery for city driving and highway performance.
S-Cross
Fuel Efficiency and Emissions
Fuel efficiency is a crucial consideration for buyers, and both vehicles offer commendable figures. The ASX has a consumption range of 4.7 to 6 L/100 km, depending on the engine and configuration. This impressive efficiency is matched with a CO2 emission class ranging from C to D, making it a responsible choice for eco-conscious drivers.
Meanwhile, the S-Cross shines with even lower consumption rates, hovering between 5.1 and 5.8 L/100 km. It boasts a slightly better CO2 emission output, ranging from 116 to 131 g/km, contributing to a more environmentally friendly footprint. Those who prioritize sustainability may find the S-Cross slightly more appealing in this area.
ASX
Dimensions and Practicality
When it comes to dimensions, the ASX measures 4239 mm in length, 1797 mm in width, and 1575 mm in height. This provides a spacious interior for passengers and cargo alike, including a trunk capacity of up to 484 liters. Its design strikes a balance between agility and roominess, ensuring a comfortable ride.
The Suzuki S-Cross, slightly larger at 4300 mm in length, 1785 mm in width, and 1580 mm in height, offers a trunk capacity of 430 liters. While the difference in cargo space is marginal, the added length can aid in cabin comfort, particularly for rear passengers. Both vehicles accommodate five passengers, making them suitable for family outings or weekend adventures.
S-Cross
Advanced Features and Technology
In terms of technology, the Mitsubishi ASX embraces modern innovations with features like a user-friendly infotainment system, advanced safety technologies, and available hybrid options. Mitsubishi focuses on enhancing driver comfort and connectivity with a range of tech-savvy features that include touchscreen displays and smartphone integration.
The Suzuki S-Cross counters this with its own set of innovations, particularly its all-wheel-drive variant that enhances performance in diverse driving conditions. The S-Cross incorporates various driver assistance systems to bolster safety, which reflects Suzuki's commitment to providing a reliable and secure driving experience.
ASX
Final Verdict: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?
Deciding between the Mitsubishi ASX and Suzuki S-Cross ultimately depends on individual preferences and needs. The ASX offers robust engine choices and slightly higher performance metrics, making it an excellent pick for those who value power. Alternatively, the S-Cross presents remarkable fuel efficiency and a wealth of hybrid options, appealing to eco-conscious consumers.
In the end, both compact SUVs deliver solid performance, practicality, and innovation, promising to cater to a wide array of drivers seeking their next adventure on the roads.
Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail
ASX
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mitsubishi ASX is only slightly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Suzuki S-Cross costs 21,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 342 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi ASX uses 4.3 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Suzuki S-Cross with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.
S-Cross
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi ASX offers clearly more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 48 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mitsubishi ASX delivers barely more torque with 245 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.
ASX
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is marginally lighter – 1,280 kg compared to 1,296 kg. The difference is around 16 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers a bit more boot space – 484 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 54 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mitsubishi ASX carries very slightly more – 445 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 40 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mitsubishi ASX stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £21,400
Mitsubishi ASX
Mitsubishi ASX
Suzuki S-Cross
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mitsubishi ASX
The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.
details
Suzuki S-Cross
The Suzuki S-Cross is a practical, well-built compact crossover that puts comfort, efficiency and everyday reliability first. With a roomy cabin, straightforward technology and sensible design, it’s a no-nonsense choice for buyers seeking a versatile family car.
details
Mitsubishi ASX
Suzuki S-Cross
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,400 - 32,500 £
|
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
99 - 137 g/km
|
co2
119 - 138 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,296 - 1,493 kg
|
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
|
Trunk capacity
430 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
Width
1,785 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
397 - 445 kg
|
Payload
395 - 405 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
Power HP
110 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
|
Torque
235 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
Power kW
81 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.