Compare performance (150 HP vs 110 HP), boot space and price (20700 £ vs 21800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – SEAT Arona or Suzuki S-Cross?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
SEAT Arona has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20700 £ , while the Suzuki S-Cross costs 21800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1062 £.
Both cars consume an average of 5.30 L per 100 km – no difference here.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the SEAT Arona has a noticeable edge – offering 150 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 40 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: SEAT Arona pulls barely noticeable stronger with 250 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 15 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, SEAT Arona is slight lighter – 1188 kg compared to 1280 kg. The difference is around 92 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Suzuki S-Cross offers slight more room – 430 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 30 L.
When it comes to payload, SEAT Arona evident takes the win – 522 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 117 kg.
The SEAT Arona is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The SEAT Arona is a cheeky urban crossover that mixes sharp styling with sensible practicality, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want personality without fuss. It’s zippy in traffic, comfortable enough for daily driving, and brings enough character to make routine journeys feel a little more fun.
detailsThe Suzuki S-Cross is a neatly packaged crossover that puts everyday practicality ahead of showy theatrics, offering a comfortable cabin and predictable handling that suit family life and weekend errands alike. It’s not a headline-grabber, but its sensible packaging, low-key charm and reputation for reliability make it a shrewd choice for buyers who prefer smart value over flash.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
20700 - 30500 £
|
Price
21800 - 34200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
120 - 132 g/km
|
co2
119 - 138 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1188 - 1268 kg
|
Curb weight
1280 - 1385 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
Trunk capacity
430 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4305 mm
|
|
Width
1780 mm
|
Width
1785 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1580 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1230 L
|
|
Payload
502 - 522 kg
|
Payload
395 - 405 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
110 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 11.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 - 185 km/h
|
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
Torque
235 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
81 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1373 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
SEAT
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.