Compare performance (136 HP vs 110 HP), boot space and price (29,800 £ vs 21,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Subaru Crosstrek or Suzuki S-Cross?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to selecting an SUV that's both practical and ready for adventure, two contenders that come to mind are the Subaru Crosstrek and the Suzuki S-Cross. Both vehicles offer unique facets catering to modern drivers. Let’s dive into their technical prowess and innovations to determine which might suit your needs best.
The Subaru Crosstrek features a petrol MHEV engine paired with a Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) which provides smooth acceleration and improved fuel efficiency. Its 136 HP and a torque of 182 Nm enable it to accelerate from 0-100 km/h in 10.8 seconds. With an all-wheel-drive system, the Crosstrek is tailored for versatility in driving conditions, pushing a top speed of 198 km/h.
On the other hand, the Suzuki S-Cross offers more engine options, including a full hybrid and petrol MHEV, with power outputs ranging from 116 HP to 129 HP. The S-Cross impresses with an acceleration from 0-100 km/h in just 9.5 seconds, demonstrating an edge in city-driving agility. Consumers have the flexibility of choosing between automatic and manual transmissions, and while all-wheel drive is available, the front-wheel drive option enhances fuel efficiency.
In terms of eco-efficiency, the Suzuki S-Cross takes the lead by offering a range of 5.1 to 5.7 L/100km in fuel consumption and CO2 emissions between 116 and 131 g/km. It garners a CO2 efficiency class of D.
Conversely, the Subaru Crosstrek consumes about 7.7 L/100km and has higher CO2 emissions at 174 g/km, placing it in the F efficiency class. While not as eco-friendly as its rival, the Crosstrek compensates with its robust all-terrain capabilities.
The Crosstrek is marginally larger, measuring 4495 mm in length, offering a substantial curb appeal. Its trunk space is 315 L, which is adequate for weekend getaways. However, its curb weight ranges from 1595 to 1628 kg, which is on the heavier side for its class.
The Suzuki S-Cross, with a length of 4300 mm, is more compact yet doesn’t shy away in practicality. Its trunk capacity extends to 430 L, providing extra room for cargo. It is notably lighter with weights between 1280 and 1435 kg, enhancing its fuel economy and driving agility.
The choice between the Subaru Crosstrek and the Suzuki S-Cross essentially boils down to priorities. The Crosstrek is ideal for those who prioritize rugged capability and all-wheel drive traction. Meanwhile, the S-Cross presents itself as a fuel-efficient urban runabout that doesn't compromise on performance or practicality.
Ultimately, both vehicles bring a commendable set of features in the compact SUV segment, catering to varied driving preferences and lifestyles. Whether it’s adventure or efficiency you seek, these models have the offerings to meet your needs.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Suzuki S-Cross is noticeably cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Subaru Crosstrek costs 29,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,058 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki S-Cross uses 5.3 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Subaru Crosstrek with 7.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.4 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Subaru Crosstrek offers slightly more power – delivering 136 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 26 HP more horsepower.
Looking at top speed, the Subaru Crosstrek is barely faster – reaching 198 km/h, while the Suzuki S-Cross tops out at 185 km/h. The difference is around 13 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Suzuki S-Cross delivers markedly more torque with 235 Nm compared to 182 Nm. That’s about 53 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is markedly lighter – 1,280 kg compared to 1,595 kg. The difference is around 315 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Suzuki S-Cross offers visibly more boot space – 430 L compared to 315 L. That’s a difference of about 115 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Subaru Crosstrek offers barely more capacity – up to 1,314 L, about 84 L more than the Suzuki S-Cross.
When it comes to payload, the Subaru Crosstrek carries a bit more – 505 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 100 kg.
The Suzuki S-Cross holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Subaru Crosstrek is a compact, go-anywhere crossover that blends rugged good looks with Subaru's familiar all-wheel-drive confidence, so it feels equally at home on backroads and in the supermarket car park. It delivers practical, reliable transport with a comfy ride and sensible features — not the flashiest cabin, but great for buyers who prefer substance over sparkle.
details
The Suzuki S-Cross is a neatly packaged crossover that puts everyday practicality ahead of showy theatrics, offering a comfortable cabin and predictable handling that suit family life and weekend errands alike. It’s not a headline-grabber, but its sensible packaging, low-key charm and reputation for reliability make it a shrewd choice for buyers who prefer smart value over flash.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,800 - 34,900 £
|
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
174 g/km
|
co2
119 - 138 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,595 - 1,628 kg
|
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
315 L
|
Trunk capacity
430 L
|
|
Length
4,495 mm
|
Length
4,305 mm
|
|
Width
1,800 mm
|
Width
1,785 mm
|
|
Height
1,600 mm
|
Height
1,580 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,297 - 1,314 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,230 L
|
|
Payload
472 - 505 kg
|
Payload
395 - 405 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 HP
|
Power HP
110 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
198 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 - 185 km/h
|
|
Torque
182 Nm
|
Torque
235 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
100 kW
|
Power kW
81 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,995 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Subaru
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España