Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Suzuki S-Cross - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 110 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 21800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Suzuki S-Cross?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Suzuki S-Cross has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21800 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3009 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Suzuki S-Cross manages with 5.30 L and is therefore barely noticeable more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.
S-Cross
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a evident edge – offering 168 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 58 HP more horsepower.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs somewhat better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Suzuki S-Cross tops out at 185 km/h. The difference is around 25 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls to a small extent stronger with 290 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 55 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is minimal lighter – 1280 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 36 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers to a small extent more room – 523 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 93 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs slight better – up to 1283 L, which is about 53 L more than the Suzuki S-Cross.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma a bit takes the win – 469 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 64 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
Suzuki S-Cross
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £24,800
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Suzuki S-Cross
4.7 (3 Reviews)
The Suzuki S-Cross is a neatly packaged crossover that puts everyday practicality ahead of showy theatrics, offering a comfortable cabin and predictable handling that suit family life and weekend errands alike. It’s not a headline-grabber, but its sensible packaging, low-key charm and reputation for reliability make it a shrewd choice for buyers who prefer smart value over flash.
details
Ford Puma
Suzuki S-Cross
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
21800 - 34200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
119 - 138 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1280 - 1385 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
430 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4305 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1785 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1580 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1230 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
395 - 405 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
110 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 - 185 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
235 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
81 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1373 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.