@ Renault Group Media
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
VS

Renault Symbioz vs Suzuki S-Cross – Which car suits you better?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Renault Symbioz or Suzuki S-Cross?

Symbioz @ Renault Group Media

Introduction: A Battle of Innovations

In the ever-evolving world of SUVs, the Renault Symbioz and Suzuki S-Cross emerge as two compelling contenders for 2024. Each models showcases distinctive features, advanced technologies, and various powertrains that cater to diverse driving needs. In this comparison, we’ll delve into the technical specifications, performance metrics, and innovative aspects that set these two SUVs apart.

S-Cross @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Design and Dimensions

The Renault Symbioz is a well-proportioned SUV, measuring 4413 mm in length, 1797 mm in width, and standing 1575 mm high. Its spacious trunk capacity of 492 liters ensures practicality for family outings or road trips.

On the other side, the Suzuki S-Cross has a slightly more compact dimension, coming in at 4300 mm long, 1785 mm wide, and 1580 mm high. While its trunk capacity is relatively smaller at 430 liters, it still offers ample space for everyday use.

Symbioz @ Renault Group Media

Powertrains: Hybrid Technologies

The Renault Symbioz is equipped with a full hybrid powertrain, featuring a 1.6L inline 4-cylinder engine that delivers a total output of 143 HP and a torque of 250 Nm. This configuration allows for efficient fuel consumption rated at 4.8 L/100 km, giving it an impressive CO2 emission level of 109 g/km. The automatic gearbox further enhances the driving experience, offering seamless shifts and smooth acceleration to 100 km/h in 10.6 seconds.

Conversely, the Suzuki S-Cross provides a choice between full hybrid and petrol MHEV engines, with power outputs ranging from 116 HP to 129 HP. It offers a robust performance with a torque of 235 Nm and a sprint to 100 km/h in just 9.5 seconds for the more powerful variants. However, it appears less efficient in terms of fuel consumption than its Renault counterpart, with figures ranging from 5.1 to 5.8 L/100 km, depending on the configuration.

S-Cross @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Drive Options and Handling

The Renault Symbioz comes with a front-wheel-drive layout, providing stability and comfort for urban driving. Its design focuses on eco-friendliness and efficient cruising, making it a solid choice for battery-conscious drivers.

In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers versatility with options for both front-wheel and all-wheel drive. This feature is particularly beneficial for those requiring off-road capabilities or enhanced traction in challenging weather conditions, positioning the S-Cross as a more adaptable option for adventurous drivers.

Symbioz @ Renault Group Media

Comfort and Interior Features

Both models seat up to five passengers comfortably, providing a premium level of comfort and technology. The Renault Symbioz emphasizes modernity with a tech-savvy interior, though specific tech features are yet to be detailed. It boasts generous legroom and rear cargo space, enhancing its overall practicality.

The Suzuki S-Cross, while also suitable for families, offers an array of interior options including advanced infotainment systems and driver-assistance technologies, making it more appealing for users who prioritize connectivity and safety features in their driving experience.

S-Cross @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Conclusion: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

In conclusion, choosing between the Renault Symbioz and Suzuki S-Cross ultimately depends on personal preferences and lifestyle requirements. The Symbioz stands out with its fuel efficiency, eco-friendly designs, and spacious cargo capacity. Meanwhile, the S-Cross appeals to those seeking versatility and performance enhancements along with modern technological features.

Both vehicles embody the spirit of innovation in the automotive world, catering to diverse driver needs as they lead the charge in the compact SUV segment for 2024. Whether you prioritize efficiency or versatility, each model has something unique to offer.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Suzuki S-Cross has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21800 £, while the Renault Symbioz costs 24400 £. That’s a price difference of around 2666 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Symbioz manages with 4.50 L and is therefore slightly more efficient than the Suzuki S-Cross with 5.30 L. The difference is about 0.80 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Symbioz has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 158 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 48 HP more horsepower.

In terms of top speed, the Suzuki S-Cross performs slight better – reaching 185 km/h, while the Renault Symbioz tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 5 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Renault Symbioz pulls somewhat stronger with 265 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is slight lighter – 1280 kg compared to 1359 kg. The difference is around 79 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Renault Symbioz offers evident more room – 576 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 146 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Renault Symbioz performs evident better – up to 1682 L, which is about 452 L more than the Suzuki S-Cross.

When it comes to payload, Renault Symbioz a bit takes the win – 459 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 54 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Renault Symbioz shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £24,400
Symbioz @ Renault Group Media

Renault Symbioz

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.5 - 6 L
details

Renault Symbioz

The Renault Symbioz feels less like a traditional car and more like a rolling living room that's been told it's allowed to drive — its flowing lines and minimalist cabin are pure concept-car theatre that teases the future of everyday transport. For buyers with an eye for design and a taste for tech-forward ideas, the Symbioz is an alluring vision of what Renault could offer tomorrow, even if it's not yet a model you can park in your driveway.

details
R-DAM_1579937 @ Renault Group Media
R-DAM_1580039 @ Renault Group Media
R-DAM_1579964 @ Renault Group Media

Suzuki S-Cross

4.5 (2)
rate

The Suzuki S-Cross is a neatly packaged crossover that puts everyday practicality ahead of showy theatrics, offering a comfortable cabin and predictable handling that suit family life and weekend errands alike. It’s not a headline-grabber, but its sensible packaging, low-key charm and reputation for reliability make it a shrewd choice for buyers who prefer smart value over flash.

details
Suzuki_S-Cross_001 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki_S-Cross_004 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki_S-Cross_016 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki_S-Cross_037 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki_S-Cross_040 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki_S-Cross_049 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation
S-CROSS_innen2 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Reviews Suzuki S-Cross

Miroljub 6 Nov 2025, 11:17:36

best

Top Car Comparisons

@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki S-Cross
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles …
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki S-Cross
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross is the scrappy, value-packed compact SUV — cheaper to buy, nimbler in town and surprisingly practical, while the Toyota Corolla Cross trades a little driving sparkle for Toyota’s famed refinement, stronger safety kit and an efficient hybrid powertrain. Pick the S‑Cross if you …
Renault Symbioz
Suzuki S-Cross
Symbioz @ Renault Group Media
S-Cross @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
24400 - 30700 £
Price
21800 - 34200 £
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6 L
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
102 - 136 g/km
co2
119 - 138 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
Fuel tank capacity
47 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1359 - 1544 kg
Curb weight
1280 - 1385 kg
Trunk capacity
492 - 576 L
Trunk capacity
430 L
Length
4413 mm
Length
4305 mm
Width
1797 mm
Width
1785 mm
Height
1575 mm
Height
1580 mm
Max trunk capacity
1582 - 1682 L
Max trunk capacity
1230 L
Payload
376 - 459 kg
Payload
395 - 405 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 158 HP
Power HP
110 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 11 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
180 - 185 km/h
Torque
250 - 265 Nm
Torque
235 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 116 kW
Power kW
81 kW
Engine capacity
1332 - 1789 cm3
Engine capacity
1373 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Renault
Brand
Suzuki

Similar Comparisons

@ Renault Group Media
Renault Austral
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Symbioz
VS
If you want a sensible, well-rounded family SUV you can actually drive home today, the Renault Austral is the clear choice — comfortable, efficient and unfussy. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is a futuristic concept car full of show-stopping ideas and tech, perfect for gawking at motor shows but …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Captur
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Captur is the practical, pocket-sized crossover that balances frugal running costs, clever packaging and everyday comfort — the sensible choice for buyers who want style without sacrifice. By contrast the Renault Symbioz is a bold electric concept, part living room, part lab car, …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Arkana
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Symbioz
VS
In the latest showdown between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz, two distinct design philosophies come to the forefront. The Arkana impresses with its sporty coupe-SUV silhouette and practical versatility, making it perfect for urban drivers who crave style and functionality. Meanwhile, …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Symbioz
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Rafale
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of automotive design, the Renault Symbioz and Renault Rafale stand out as two distinct visions of the future. The Symbioz impresses with its innovative electric platform and seamless connectivity features, emphasizing a sustainable driving experience. Meanwhile, the …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Symbioz
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
Dacia Bigster
VS
In a straight fight between Renault’s dreamy Symbioz and Dacia’s pragmatic Bigster, the Symbioz seduces with living‑room luxury and sci‑fi tech while the Bigster scores on honest space, rugged bones and a price tag you can actually imagine. If you want a show‑stopping concept that imagines the …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Captur
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Unsure whether the Renault Captur or the Suzuki S-Cross is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Symbioz
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Kona stands out with its bold design and advanced technology features, offering drivers a dynamic and engaging driving experience. In contrast, the Renault Symbioz takes a more futuristic approach, emphasizing sustainability and autonomous driving …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Niro
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Kia Niro and Renault Symbioz present a fascinating contrast in the growing hybrid and electric vehicle market. With the Niro’s practical design and impressive fuel efficiency, it appeals to everyday drivers looking for reliability. In contrast, the futuristic Renault Symbioz pushes boundaries …
What drive types are available for the Renault Symbioz?

The Renault Symbioz is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.