@ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
@ Volvo Cars
VS

Mitsubishi ASX vs Volvo XC40 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (158 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (20600 £ vs 36800 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi ASX or Volvo XC40?

Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ASX @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mitsubishi ASX has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20600 £, while the Volvo XC40 costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 16200 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi ASX manages with 4.40 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.50 L. The difference is about 2.10 L per 100 km.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC40 has a to a small extent edge – offering 197 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 39 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC40 is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.60 s, while the Mitsubishi ASX takes 8.50 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the performs better – reaching , while the tops out at . The difference is around .

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC40 pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 300 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.

ASX @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is clearly perceptible lighter – 1296 kg compared to 1688 kg. The difference is around 392 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers slight more room – 484 L compared to 452 L. That’s a difference of about 32 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mitsubishi ASX performs somewhat better – up to 1596 L, which is about 268 L more than the Volvo XC40.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC40 to a small extent takes the win – 532 kg compared to 449 kg. That’s a difference of about 83 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mitsubishi ASX proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mitsubishi ASX is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £20,600
ASX @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation

Mitsubishi ASX

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 91 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 6 L
details
Mitsubishi ASX
Volvo XC40

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.

details
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_front_variation_low @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_rear_variation_low @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_interior_low @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_Overview-Trunk_open_low @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation

Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal @ Volvo Cars
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl @ Volvo Cars

Reviews Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Mitsubishi ASX
Volvo XC40
ASX @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price
20600 - 32500 £
Price
36800 - 47200 £
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
99 - 135 g/km
co2
147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1296 - 1493 kg
Curb weight
1688 kg
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
4239 mm
Length
4425 mm
Width
1797 mm
Width
1863 mm
Height
1575 mm
Height
1652 mm
Max trunk capacity
1458 - 1596 L
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
Payload
397 - 449 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
91 - 158 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 14 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
168 - 180 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
160 - 270 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
67 - 116 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1789 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo EX40
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota RAV4
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Toyota RAV4 stands out with its robust reliability and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a popular choice for families and adventurers alike. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 features a more premium design and advanced safety technology, appealing to those …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Austral
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive realm of compact SUVs, the Renault Austral and the Volvo XC40 each offer distinct attributes catering to different customer desires. The Renault Austral emphasizes affordability and efficient urban maneuverability, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers seeking practicality. …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the realm of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kodiaq and the Volvo XC40 both present compelling choices with their distinct offerings. The Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical features, making it an ideal choice for families who value comfort and utility. On the other hand, the XC40 …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the battle of sportiness and practicality, the CUPRA Formentor and Volvo XC40 present compelling choices for discerning drivers. The Formentor's dynamic styling and performance-oriented features exude a sense of excitement, while the XC40 offers a more refined and spacious interior paired with a …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty styling and performance-oriented features, appealing to driving enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 offers a more refined interior and a strong emphasis on safety, making it an ideal choice for families. Both …
What drive types are available for the Mitsubishi ASX?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.