Compare performance (143 HP vs 211 HP), boot space and price (18,200 £ vs 22,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Colt or Skoda Epiq?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mitsubishi Colt is visibly cheaper – starting at 18,200 £ , while the Skoda Epiq costs 22,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,038 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Epiq offers clearly more power – delivering 211 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Epiq is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.1 s, while the Mitsubishi Colt takes 9.3 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Epiq delivers clearly more torque with 290 Nm compared to 160 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Colt is noticeably lighter – 1,189 kg compared to 1,625 kg. The difference is around 436 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Epiq offers somewhat more boot space – 475 L compared to 391 L. That’s a difference of about 84 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Epiq carries slightly more – 455 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 70 kg.
The Skoda Epiq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
18,200 - 25,000 £
|
Price
22,200 - 30,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.7 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
310 - 440 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
96 - 119 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,189 - 1,380 kg
|
Curb weight
1,625 - 1,642 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
|
Trunk capacity
475 L
|
|
Length
4,053 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,798 mm
|
Width
1,798 mm
|
|
Height
1,439 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1,069 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
381 - 385 kg
|
Payload
438 - 455 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 211 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
174 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
|
Torque
267 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 155 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Brand
Skoda
|