VS

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs Nissan Ariya comparison

Compare performance (218 HP vs 435 HP), boot space and price (41,100 £ vs 37,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross or Nissan Ariya?

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs Nissan Ariya: Key differences

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly more efficient
  • moderately more electric range
  • marginally more trunk space

Nissan Ariya

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Eclipse Cross

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Nissan Ariya is moderately cheaper – starting at 37,300 £ , while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross costs 41,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,857 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is only slightly more efficient: consuming 16.7 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Nissan Ariya. That’s a difference of about 1 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross offers moderately more range – reaching up to 635 km, about 104 km more than the Nissan Ariya.

Ariya

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Ariya offers clearly more power – delivering 435 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 217 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Ariya is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5 s, while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross takes 7.9 s. That’s about 2.9 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Nissan Ariya is a bit faster – reaching 200 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Ariya delivers considerably more torque with 600 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 300 Nm more.

Eclipse Cross

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

Looking at boot space, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross offers marginally more boot space – 487 L compared to 468 L. That’s a difference of about 19 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross offers a bit more capacity – up to 1,670 L, about 320 L more than the Nissan Ariya.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Nissan Ariya is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,300
Ariya

Nissan Ariya

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 218 - 435 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.7 - 24.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 402 - 531 km
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Nissan Ariya

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross combines coupe-like looks with crossover practicality, so you get style without the showroom attitude. It’s an affable daily driver that hides a few quirks behind a confident grin, making it an easy pick for buyers who want personality without fuss.

details

Nissan Ariya

The Nissan Ariya wraps futuristic, sculpted styling around a calm, high-tech cabin, making the switch to electric feel surprisingly easy and grown-up. It’s a comfortable, sensible EV that favors everyday usability and clever packaging over headline-grabbing theatrics — ideal for buyers who want an elegant, low-fuss electric car without the ego.

details
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Nissan Ariya

Costs and Consumption

Price
41,100 - 48,200 £
Price
37,300 - 54,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 16.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 24.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
635 km
Electric Range
402 - 531 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
63 - 87 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
-
Curb weight
1,980 - 2,277 kg
Trunk capacity
487 L
Trunk capacity
415 - 468 L
Length
4,489 mm
Length
4,595 mm
Width
1,908 mm
Width
1,850 mm
Height
1,571 mm
Height
1,650 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,670 L
Max trunk capacity
1,280 - 1,350 L
Payload
-
Payload
363 - 420 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
218 HP
Power HP
218 - 435 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5 - 7.6 s
Max Speed
170 km/h
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
Torque
300 Nm
Torque
300 - 600 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
160 kW
Power kW
160 - 320 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,022 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Nissan
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.