VS

Nissan Ariya vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (435 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (54,800 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Ariya or Skoda Enyaq?

Nissan Ariya vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

Nissan Ariya

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • noticeably more electric range
  • barely lighter
  • markedly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Ariya

As the race towards electrification accelerates, the automotive landscape is awash with compelling choices in the electric SUV segment. Two noteworthy contenders are the Nissan Ariya and the Skoda Enyaq. Both vehicles boast innovative technology, impressive performance metrics, and competitive range offerings, but how do they stack up against each other? Let’s delve into a detailed comparison.

Enyaq

Powertrain and Performance

The Nissan Ariya offers an array of power options with configurations ranging from 218 HP to a robust 435 HP, catering to varying driving preferences. Its electric range is equally impressive, with options reaching up to 531 km, depending on the battery capacity of 63 kWh or 87 kWh. The Ariya accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 5 seconds with its most powerful variant, providing an exhilarating driving experience for enthusiasts.

On the other hand, the Skoda Enyaq provides a slightly simplified powertrain lineup, with maximum outputs of 286 HP and 340 HP. Despite lower horsepower figures compared to the Ariya, the Enyaq achieves remarkable efficiency, with energy consumption as low as 14.6 kWh/100 km. It also offers an electric range of up to 573 km, showcasing its prowess in long-distance driving.

Ariya

Design and Dimensions

In terms of physical dimensions, the Nissan Ariya measures 4595 mm in length, 1850 mm in width, and 1650 mm in height. It presents a sleek, contemporary design that is distinctly Nissan while providing ample trunk space of 468 liters. The interior is designed to prioritize comfort and technology, providing a pleasant experience for passengers.

The Skoda Enyaq is slightly larger with measurements of 4649 mm or 4653 mm in length, 1879 mm in width, and a height of 1620-1621 mm. Its cargo capacity surpasses that of the Ariya, with up to 585 liters available, making it more practical for families or those needing extra storage. Skoda’s design ethos offers a spacious and functional interior filled with high-quality materials and innovative technology integrations.

Enyaq

Battery and Charging Innovations

The Ariya's battery options provide flexibility—bigger batteries for longer ranges or smaller options for lighter weights and improved efficiency. Its maximum charging speed can reach 130 kW, allowing for rapid charging in less time. Key technology features include advanced thermal management systems that optimize battery performance across various conditions.

Conversely, the Skoda Enyaq excels in efficiency, positioned as an eco-friendly option with a lower consumption rate. Its battery capacity holds at 77 kWh, striking a balance between performance and sustainability. The Enyaq supports ultra-fast charging up to 125 kW, ensuring owners can quickly replenish their battery on long trips, an influential factor for many electric vehicle buyers.

Ariya

Tech Features and Safety

When it comes to technology, both models pack an impressive arsenal. The Nissan Ariya is equipped with the latest Nissan Intelligent Mobility features, including ProPILOT Assist for semi-autonomous driving capability. The digital cockpit, with a large screen integrated into the dashboard, keeps drivers connected and informed with navigational aids and vehicle health monitoring.

The Skoda Enyaq, on the other hand, also prioritizes tech-savvy drivers with its innovative infotainment system. It features a larger central display, intuitive controls, and a suite of driver-assistance features that ensure safety and convenience, across varying driving scenarios.

Enyaq

Conclusion: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

Both the Nissan Ariya and the Skoda Enyaq cater to distinct market segments but remarkably focus on similar sustainability aims. The Ariya shines on the performance end with a diverse range of power outputs, while the Enyaq offers superior efficiency and cargo space. Ultimately, the choice comes down to individual priorities—whether one values raw power and driving excitement or practicality and range efficiency. As the electric vehicle segment continues to evolve, both SUVs are impressive players showcasing the future of automotive innovation.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ariya

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Enyaq is clearly cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the Nissan Ariya costs 54,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,000 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is considerably more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 24.5 kWh/100km for the Nissan Ariya. That’s a difference of about 9.6 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 172 km more than the Nissan Ariya.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Ariya offers noticeably more power – delivering 435 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 95 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Ariya is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers slightly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 600 Nm. That’s about 79 Nm more.

Ariya

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is barely lighter – 2,074 kg compared to 2,277 kg. The difference is around 203 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers markedly more boot space – 585 L compared to 415 L. That’s a difference of about 170 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries clearly more – 526 kg compared to 363 kg. That’s a difference of about 163 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 449 - 589 km
Nissan Ariya
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Nissan Ariya

The Nissan Ariya wraps futuristic, sculpted styling around a calm, high-tech cabin, making the switch to electric feel surprisingly easy and grown-up. It’s a comfortable, sensible EV that favors everyday usability and clever packaging over headline-grabbing theatrics — ideal for buyers who want an elegant, low-fuss electric car without the ego.

details

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
Nissan Ariya
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

Price
54,800 £
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
24.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
417 km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,277 kg
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Trunk capacity
415 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,850 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
363 kg
Payload
449 - 526 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
435 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
600 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
320 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.