In the evolving landscape of electric vehicles, the Nissan Ariya and Skoda Enyaq stand out as compelling options for eco-conscious drivers. The Ariya impresses with its sleek design and advanced technology features, while the Enyaq offers a spacious interior and a strong driving range. Both models cater to different preferences, making them worthy contenders for anyone looking to step into the electric future.
As the race towards electrification accelerates, the automotive landscape is awash with compelling choices in the electric SUV segment. Two noteworthy contenders are the Nissan Ariya and the Skoda Enyaq. Both vehicles boast innovative technology, impressive performance metrics, and competitive range offerings, but how do they stack up against each other? Let’s delve into a detailed comparison.
The Nissan Ariya offers an array of power options with configurations ranging from 218 HP to a robust 435 HP, catering to varying driving preferences. Its electric range is equally impressive, with options reaching up to 531 km, depending on the battery capacity of 63 kWh or 87 kWh. The Ariya accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 5 seconds with its most powerful variant, providing an exhilarating driving experience for enthusiasts.
On the other hand, the Skoda Enyaq provides a slightly simplified powertrain lineup, with maximum outputs of 286 HP and 340 HP. Despite lower horsepower figures compared to the Ariya, the Enyaq achieves remarkable efficiency, with energy consumption as low as 14.6 kWh/100 km. It also offers an electric range of up to 573 km, showcasing its prowess in long-distance driving.
In terms of physical dimensions, the Nissan Ariya measures 4595 mm in length, 1850 mm in width, and 1650 mm in height. It presents a sleek, contemporary design that is distinctly Nissan while providing ample trunk space of 468 liters. The interior is designed to prioritize comfort and technology, providing a pleasant experience for passengers.
The Skoda Enyaq is slightly larger with measurements of 4649 mm or 4653 mm in length, 1879 mm in width, and a height of 1620-1621 mm. Its cargo capacity surpasses that of the Ariya, with up to 585 liters available, making it more practical for families or those needing extra storage. Skoda’s design ethos offers a spacious and functional interior filled with high-quality materials and innovative technology integrations.
The Ariya's battery options provide flexibility—bigger batteries for longer ranges or smaller options for lighter weights and improved efficiency. Its maximum charging speed can reach 130 kW, allowing for rapid charging in less time. Key technology features include advanced thermal management systems that optimize battery performance across various conditions.
Conversely, the Skoda Enyaq excels in efficiency, positioned as an eco-friendly option with a lower consumption rate. Its battery capacity holds at 77 kWh, striking a balance between performance and sustainability. The Enyaq supports ultra-fast charging up to 125 kW, ensuring owners can quickly replenish their battery on long trips, an influential factor for many electric vehicle buyers.
When it comes to technology, both models pack an impressive arsenal. The Nissan Ariya is equipped with the latest Nissan Intelligent Mobility features, including ProPILOT Assist for semi-autonomous driving capability. The digital cockpit, with a large screen integrated into the dashboard, keeps drivers connected and informed with navigational aids and vehicle health monitoring.
The Skoda Enyaq, on the other hand, also prioritizes tech-savvy drivers with its innovative infotainment system. It features a larger central display, intuitive controls, and a suite of driver-assistance features that ensure safety and convenience, across varying driving scenarios.
Both the Nissan Ariya and the Skoda Enyaq cater to distinct market segments but remarkably focus on similar sustainability aims. The Ariya shines on the performance end with a diverse range of power outputs, while the Enyaq offers superior efficiency and cargo space. Ultimately, the choice comes down to individual priorities—whether one values raw power and driving excitement or practicality and range efficiency. As the electric vehicle segment continues to evolve, both SUVs are impressive players showcasing the future of automotive innovation.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 37300 - 54800
£
|
Price
about 38100 - 54300
£
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 24.5
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.4
kWh
|
Electric Range
402 - 531
km
|
Electric Range
428 - 587
km
|
Battery Capacity
63 - 87
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77
kWh
|
co2
0
g/km
|
co2
0
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1980 - 2259
kg
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2258
kg
|
Trunk capacity
415 - 468
L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585
L
|
Length
4595
mm
|
Length
4649 - 4658
mm
|
Width
1850
mm
|
Width
1879
mm
|
Height
1650
mm
|
Height
1620 - 1623
mm
|
Payload
396 - 420
kg
|
Payload
492 - 528
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
218 - 435
HP
|
Power HP
204 - 340
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5 - 7.6
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 - 8.1
s
|
Max Speed
160 - 200
km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180
km/h
|
Torque
300 - 600
Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Power kW
160 - 320
kW
|
Power kW
150 - 250
kW
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Top speed
160 - 200
km/h
|
Top speed
160 - 180
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2022 - 2025
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Skoda
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.