VS

Skoda Enyaq vs Volvo EX40 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (340 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (41900 £ vs 42800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or Volvo EX40?

Enyaq

City Savvy or Scandinavian Calm?

The Skoda Enyaq arrives with the pragmatic stance of a car designed to make everyday life easier, where function meets a touch of cleverness, while the Volvo EX40 projects a more reserved, refined temperament that leans into Scandinavian calm. In town, the Enyaq feels like the sensible friend who always knows the shortcut and packs an umbrella; the EX40 plays the part of the composed colleague who turns heads without shouting. Both are composed and polite in traffic, but their personalities give away who they’re aimed at — practical households versus those chasing a premium, understated statement. If you care about character over raw numbers, this is where your taste starts to pick sides.

EX40

Cabin Life: Family Room vs Minimalist Retreat

Step inside the Enyaq and you get the impression of a versatile living room — thoughtful storage nooks, straightforward controls and a sense that the layout was planned around real family life. The EX40 trades some of that utility for a quieter, more pared-back interior that emphasises materials and a soothing ambience; it’s the kind of cabin that makes long drives feel less taxing. Both cabins are comfortable and well put together, but their approaches differ: one prioritises everyday fuss-free usability, the other prioritises a calm, premium mood. For buyers who ferry kids, gear and groceries, practicality matters; for buyers who prize serenity and finish, the Volvo’s vibe may win hearts.

Enyaq

How They Drive: Relaxed Commuter or Alert Companion?

On the move the Enyaq tends to comfort-first handling, smoothing out urban imperfections and letting occupants arrive less frazzled, while the EX40 brings a bit more immediacy to steering and a firmer demeanour that rewards a more engaged driver. Neither is tense or harsh; think of the Enyaq as the composed cruiser and the EX40 as the attentive partner on twisty backroads. The difference is more about emotional tone than extremes — comfortable confidence versus polite sportiness — so your daily route and driving style will reveal which feels more natural. In short, choose the companion that matches how you like to spend your time behind the wheel.

EX40

Practicalities That Matter: Weekend Gear and Daily Groceries

When real life intrudes — bikes, prams, suitcases — the Enyaq shows its strength as a true family-friendly tool, with generous, straightforward load space and door apertures that make packing painless. The EX40 manages the same tasks with more of a premium finesse, though its architecture feels a touch more sculpted and less utilitarian than the Skoda’s. Both accommodate child seats, long weekends and supermarket sprees without drama, but the Enyaq is the one that makes those chores feel easiest. If you measure value by how little thought you have to give to packing, that practical streak becomes hard to ignore.

Enyaq

Design and Presence: Practical Charm vs Quiet Prestige

From the curb the Enyaq blends pragmatic proportions with friendly detailing that reads as approachable and sensible rather than flashy, while the EX40 speaks the language of modern Scandinavian design — restrained, elegant and quietly premium. Each has visual cues that telegraph its brand values: one says “useful and sensible,” the other says “crafted and considered.” Both will attract different sorts of buyers — families and value seekers for the Enyaq, style-conscious professionals for the EX40 — and both will earn approving glances for different reasons. Your preference will reveal whether you value function-first charm or understated luxury.

EX40

Who Should Consider Which?

If your life revolves around practicality — school runs, DIY hauls and a knack for squeezing the most out of a euro — the Skoda Enyaq will feel like a smart, sensible ally that reduces friction in day-to-day life, whereas the Volvo EX40 will appeal to buyers who prioritise cabin ambience, brand cachet and a slightly more refined driving tone. Commuters who crave comfort and families who need fuss-free flexibility will both find strong arguments for either car, depending on whether they lean toward utility or premium calm. Read on and weigh the atmospheres and everyday usability for yourself — the DriveDuel Champion will be revealed afterwards.

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

5 (3 Reviews)
rate

Volvo EX40

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Enyaq has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41900 £ , while the Volvo EX40 costs 42800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 934 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s to a small extent more efficient than the Volvo EX40 with 16.60 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.80 kWh.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq performs slight better – achieving up to 587 km, about 11 km more than the Volvo EX40.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX40 has a evident edge – offering 442 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 102 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX40 is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.60 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.40 s. That’s about 0.80 s faster.

There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 180 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls barely noticeable stronger with 679 Nm compared to 670 Nm. That’s about 9 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Volvo EX40 is barely noticeable lighter – 2040 kg compared to 2179 kg. The difference is around 139 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers evident more room – 585 L compared to 410 L. That’s a difference of about 175 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs to a small extent better – up to 1710 L, which is about 310 L more than the Volvo EX40.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq hardly perceptible takes the win – 489 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 9 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX40 is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX40

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis
from about £42,800
EX40

Volvo EX40

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 238 - 442 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.6 - 17.6 kWh
  • Electric Range : 480 - 576 km

Skoda Enyaq

5 (3 Reviews)
rate

The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.

details

Volvo EX40

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Volvo EX40 wraps Scandinavian calm and clever practicality into a compact electric package that feels both premium and refreshingly uncomplicated. It's the grown-up answer to flashier rivals — a safe, comfy, and city-friendly EV with thoughtful tech that makes everyday driving quietly satisfying.

details
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX40

Costs and Consumption

Price
41900 - 52200 £
Price
42800 - 58200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.6 kWh
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
Electric Range
480 - 576 km
Battery Capacity
77 kWh
Battery Capacity
67 - 79 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2179 - 2293 kg
Curb weight
2040 - 2170 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
410 L
Length
4658 mm
Length
4440 mm
Width
1879 mm
Width
1863 mm
Height
1620 - 1621 mm
Height
1647 mm
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
Max trunk capacity
1400 L
Payload
443 - 489 kg
Payload
430 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Volvo
Is the Skoda Enyaq offered with different drivetrains?

The Skoda Enyaq is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.