Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Enyaq vs Volvo EX40 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (340 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (38100 £ vs 42800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or Volvo EX40?
Enyaq
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Enyaq has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 38100 £ , while the Volvo EX40 costs 42800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4791 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s to a small extent more efficient than the Volvo EX40 with 16.60 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.80 kWh.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq performs slight better – achieving up to 587 km, about 11 km more than the Volvo EX40.
EX40
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX40 has a evident edge – offering 442 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 102 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX40 is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.60 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.40 s. That’s about 0.80 s faster.
There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 180 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls barely noticeable stronger with 679 Nm compared to 670 Nm. That’s about 9 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Enyaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is barely noticeable lighter – 2002 kg compared to 2040 kg. The difference is around 38 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers evident more room – 585 L compared to 410 L. That’s a difference of about 175 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs to a small extent better – up to 1710 L, which is about 310 L more than the Volvo EX40.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq hardly perceptible takes the win – 509 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 29 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Enyaq is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX40
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £38,100
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Enyaq
5 (3 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
Volvo EX40
The Volvo EX40 wraps Scandinavian calm and clever practicality into a compact electric package that feels both premium and refreshingly uncomplicated. It's the grown-up answer to flashier rivals — a safe, comfy, and city-friendly EV with thoughtful tech that makes everyday driving quietly satisfying.
details
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX40
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38100 - 52200 £
|
Price
42800 - 58200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.6 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
|
Electric Range
480 - 576 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
67 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
|
Curb weight
2040 - 2170 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
410 L
|
|
Length
4658 mm
|
Length
4440 mm
|
|
Width
1879 mm
|
Width
1863 mm
|
|
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
|
Height
1647 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1286 - 1400 L
|
|
Payload
457 - 509 kg
|
Payload
430 - 480 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Is the Skoda Enyaq offered with different drivetrains?
The Skoda Enyaq is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.