VS

Mitsubishi Space Star vs Alpine A390 comparison

Compare performance (71 HP vs 470 HP), boot space and price (11,600 £ vs 57,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Space Star or Alpine A390?

Mitsubishi Space Star vs Alpine A390: Key differences

Mitsubishi Space Star

4.2 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • significantly lighter
details

Alpine A390

  • clearly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Space Star

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mitsubishi Space Star is clearly cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Alpine A390 costs 57,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 46,209 £.

A390

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A390 offers clearly more power – delivering 470 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 399 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A390 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 10.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Alpine A390 delivers substantially more torque with 824 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 722 Nm more.

Space Star

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is significantly lighter – 940 kg compared to 2,121 kg. The difference is around 1,181 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Alpine A390 offers substantially more boot space – 532 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 297 L.

When it comes to payload, the Alpine A390 carries slightly more – 484 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 84 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Alpine A390 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £57,900
A390

Alpine A390

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 400 - 470 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 18.7 - 20.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 503 - 551 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Rafale
Alpine A390
VS
The Renault Rafale and the Alpine A390 pit two different approaches to sporty French motoring against each other: the Rafale leans toward a sleek, tech-rich grand-tourer crossover, while the A390 is aimed at lightweight, driver-focused performance in traditional Alpine fashion. This comparison will …
Hyundai i10
Mitsubishi Space Star
VS
In the battle of compact city cars, the Hyundai i10 impresses with its stylish design and user-friendly tech features, making it a top choice for urban drivers. On the other hand, the Mitsubishi Space Star offers a spacious interior and exceptional fuel efficiency, catering well to those seeking …
Mitsubishi Space Star
Alpine A390

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

details
DSC_2683_low
DSC_6272_low
DSC_8755_low
050_low

Reviews Mitsubishi Space Star

4.2 (3 Reviews)
rate
Bernard
19 May 2026, 19:43:01

Mitsubishi is more reliable brand, also the mirage /space star is more Fuel efficient than dacia Sandero

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Alpine A390

The Alpine A390 is the brand’s leap into the fast electric crossover arena, wrapping Dieppe’s lightweight ethos in a sleek, coupe-ish body with real everyday usability. If the steering and chassis feel echo the A110, this could be the enthusiast’s family EV—subtle, sharp, and très chic, with enough theatre to make the school run feel like a pit lane exit.

details
serpimg_Yl24Nh

Reviews Alpine A390

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Dacia Sandero
Mitsubishi Space Star
VS
In the battle of budget-friendly hatchbacks, the Dacia Sandero stands out with its robust build, offering generous interior space and modern infotainment features at an unbeatable price. Meanwhile, the Mitsubishi Mirage (known as the Space Star in European markets) appeals to urban drivers with its …
Honda Jazz
Mitsubishi Space Star
VS
Unsure whether the Honda Jazz or the Mitsubishi Space Star is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mitsubishi Colt
Mitsubishi Space Star
VS
In the competitive subcompact segment, the Mitsubishi Colt and Mitsubishi Space Star offer unique appeals to different drivers. The Colt shines with its sporty design and responsive handling, making it an exciting choice for urban driving. Meanwhile, the Space Star prioritizes practicality and fuel …
Polestar 4
Alpine A390
VS
The Polestar 4 and Alpine A390 represent two very different takes on performance and style: the Polestar 4 is a polished, tech-rich electric crossover focused on everyday comfort and efficiency, while the Alpine A390 prioritizes a lightweight, driver-focused sports-car experience. Choosing between …
Kia Picanto
Mitsubishi Space Star
VS
Kia Picanto and Mitsubishi Space Star go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mitsubishi Space Star
Suzuki Ignis
VS
In the battle of compact urban warriors, the Mitsubishi Space Star and Suzuki Ignis both offer unique appeals tailored for city life. The Space Star stands out with its impressive fuel efficiency and surprisingly spacious interior, making it an ideal choice for those seeking practicality. On the …
Genesis GV60
Alpine A390
VS
Genesis GV60 and Alpine A390 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Alpine A390
Volvo EX60
VS
The Alpine A390 and Volvo EX60 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mitsubishi Space Star
Alpine A390

Costs and Consumption
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
Price
57,900 - 66,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 20.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
503 - 551 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
112 - 125 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
Curb weight
2,121 - 2,124 kg
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Trunk capacity
532 L
Length
3,845 mm
Length
-
Width
1,665 mm
Width
1,885 mm
Height
1,505 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
359 - 400 kg
Payload
481 - 484 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
71 HP
Power HP
400 - 470 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 4.8 s
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
102 Nm
Torque
661 - 824 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
52 kW
Power kW
295 - 345 kW
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Alpine
What drivetrain options does the Mitsubishi Space Star have?

The Mitsubishi Space Star is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.