Compare performance (653 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (71,100 £ vs 36,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – NIO EL8 or Nissan Interstar?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Nissan Interstar is considerably cheaper – starting at 36,200 £ , while the NIO EL8 costs 71,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 34,898 £.
As for electric range, the NIO EL8 offers moderately more range – reaching up to 510 km, about 100 km more than the Nissan Interstar.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the NIO EL8 offers substantially more power – delivering 653 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 483 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the NIO EL8 delivers clearly more torque with 850 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 470 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: NIO EL8 offers more seats – 6 vs 3.
In terms of curb weight, Nissan Interstar is visibly lighter – 2,053 kg compared to 2,613 kg. The difference is around 560 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries considerably more – 1,447 kg compared to 577 kg. That’s a difference of about 870 kg.
The NIO EL8 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The NIO EL8 feels like a tech-savvy living room on wheels, blending upscale comfort with playful design for buyers who want electric refinement without the clinical vibe. It’s roomy, packed with clever features and a relaxed driving character that turns everyday trips into something a little more fun.
details
The Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
71,100 - 90,800 £
|
Price
36,200 - 54,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 22 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
390 - 510 km
|
Electric Range
410 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
73.5 - 90 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 205 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
6
|
Seats
3
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,613 - 2,633 kg
|
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,455 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
265 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
5,099 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,989 mm
|
Width
2,080 mm
|
|
Height
1,750 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
810 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
557 - 577 kg
|
Payload
1,045 - 1,447 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
653 HP
|
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
850 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
480 kW
|
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
NIO
|
Brand
Nissan
|