Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
NIO ET5 vs XPeng P7 comparison
Compare performance (490 HP vs 473 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 42,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – NIO ET5 or XPeng P7?
NIO ET5 vs XPeng P7: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
ET5
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
NIO ET5 is only slightly cheaper – starting at 40,700 £ , while the XPeng P7 costs 42,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,800 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the XPeng P7 is slightly more efficient: consuming 16.8 kWh/100km compared to 18.6 kWh/100km for the NIO ET5. That’s a difference of about 1.8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the NIO ET5 offers marginally more range – reaching up to 590 km, about 14 km more than the XPeng P7.
P7
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the NIO ET5 offers marginally more power – delivering 490 HP compared to 473 HP. That’s roughly 17 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the NIO ET5 is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the XPeng P7 takes 4.1 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.
There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 200 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the XPeng P7 delivers only slightly more torque with 757 Nm compared to 700 Nm. That’s about 57 Nm more.
ET5
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, XPeng P7 is barely lighter – 2,020 kg compared to 2,215 kg. The difference is around 195 kg.
Looking at boot space, the XPeng P7 offers a bit more boot space – 440 L compared to 386 L. That’s a difference of about 54 L.
When it comes to payload, the NIO ET5 carries marginally more – 475 kg compared to 430 kg. That’s a difference of about 45 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The XPeng P7 is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £42,500
XPeng P7
NIO ET5
XPeng P7
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
NIO ET5
NIO ET5 arrives with sleek, minimalist lines and a cabin that feels more like a calm lounge than a dashboard, delivering a composed drive that keeps motorway monotony at bay. Tech is smart rather than showy, and the brand’s novel ownership options make it an appealing choice for buyers who want electric convenience without the usual headaches — plus it brings enough personality to make charging stops less boring.
details
XPeng P7
The XPeng P7 cuts a sleek, coupe-like silhouette that looks like a tech firm's idea of a stylish electric sedan, and its minimalist cabin packs smart screens and handy features that actually improve everyday life. Underneath the future-facing image it drives with surprising poise and comes loaded with advanced driver aids, making it a tempting choice for buyers who want electric charisma without the hype.
details
NIO ET5
XPeng P7
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
40,700 - 58,700 £
|
Price
42,500 - 50,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.6 - 18.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.8 - 19.2 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
456 - 590 km
|
Electric Range
505 - 576 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
73.5 - 90 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
82.7 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,215 - 2,235 kg
|
Curb weight
2,020 - 2,140 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
386 L
|
Trunk capacity
440 L
|
|
Length
4,790 mm
|
Length
4,888 mm
|
|
Width
1,960 mm
|
Width
1,896 mm
|
|
Height
1,499 mm
|
Height
1,450 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,135 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
455 - 475 kg
|
Payload
430 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
490 HP
|
Power HP
276 - 473 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 6.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
|
Torque
700 Nm
|
Torque
440 - 757 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
360 kW
|
Power kW
203 - 348 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
NIO
|
Brand
XPeng
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.