VS

Nissan Ariya vs Volvo EC40 comparison

Compare performance (435 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (54,800 £ vs 46,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Ariya or Volvo EC40?

Nissan Ariya vs Volvo EC40: Key differences

Nissan Ariya

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally more trunk space
details

Volvo EC40

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • only slightly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ariya

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Volvo EC40 is a bit cheaper – starting at 46,500 £ , while the Nissan Ariya costs 54,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,314 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo EC40 is clearly more efficient: consuming 16.2 kWh/100km compared to 24.5 kWh/100km for the Nissan Ariya. That’s a difference of about 8.3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EC40 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 585 km, about 168 km more than the Nissan Ariya.

EC40

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 offers only slightly more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 435 HP. That’s roughly 7 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Nissan Ariya takes 5 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EC40 delivers somewhat more torque with 670 Nm compared to 600 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.

Ariya

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo EC40 is somewhat lighter – 2,065 kg compared to 2,277 kg. The difference is around 212 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Nissan Ariya offers marginally more boot space – 415 L compared to 404 L. That’s a difference of about 11 L.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo EC40 carries somewhat more – 435 kg compared to 363 kg. That’s a difference of about 72 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EC40 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £46,500
EC40

Volvo EC40

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 238 - 442 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 486 - 585 km
Nissan Ariya
Volvo EC40

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Nissan Ariya

The Nissan Ariya wraps futuristic, sculpted styling around a calm, high-tech cabin, making the switch to electric feel surprisingly easy and grown-up. It’s a comfortable, sensible EV that favors everyday usability and clever packaging over headline-grabbing theatrics — ideal for buyers who want an elegant, low-fuss electric car without the ego.

details

Volvo EC40

The Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.

details
Nissan Ariya
Volvo EC40

Costs and Consumption

Price
54,800 £
Price
46,500 - 56,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
24.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
417 km
Electric Range
486 - 585 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,277 kg
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,185 kg
Trunk capacity
415 L
Trunk capacity
404 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,850 mm
Width
1,873 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
363 kg
Payload
395 - 435 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
435 HP
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
600 Nm
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
320 kW
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.