Compare performance (170 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (36,200 £ vs 42,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Interstar or smart #3?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Nissan Interstar is slightly cheaper – starting at 36,200 £ , while the smart #3 costs 42,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,832 £.
As for electric range, the smart #3 offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 455 km, about 45 km more than the Nissan Interstar.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the smart #3 offers clearly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 102 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the smart #3 delivers marginally more torque with 384 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 4 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: smart #3 offers more seats – 5 vs 3.
In terms of curb weight, smart #3 is slightly lighter – 1,810 kg compared to 2,053 kg. The difference is around 243 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries significantly more – 1,447 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 997 kg.
The smart #3 is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.
details
The Smart #3 turns the brand's cheeky city-car attitude into a grown-up compact SUV, pairing sleek styling with a surprisingly roomy, well-made interior. It's a brilliant pick for buyers who want electric ease without dullness — practical enough for daily life, but still lively enough to make parking and grocery runs feel a little fun.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36,200 - 54,800 £
|
Price
42,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 7.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
410 km
|
Electric Range
455 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 205 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
3
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,455 kg
|
Curb weight
1,810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
370 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,080 mm
|
Width
1,844 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
1,045 - 1,447 kg
|
Payload
450 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
|
Power HP
272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
|
Torque
384 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
|
Power kW
200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
smart
|