Compare performance (143 HP vs 218 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 23,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Juke or Hyundai Kona?
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, two models have caught the attention of automotive enthusiasts worldwide—the Hyundai Kona and the Nissan Juke. Both vehicles offer a blend of style, performance, and innovation, making them appealing choices for modern drivers. This article will delve into the technical aspects and innovations that set these two rivals apart.
The Hyundai Kona presents a sleek and modern design with a slightly larger stance, measuring a length of up to 4385 mm, width of 1825 mm, and height of 1585 mm. On the other hand, the Nissan Juke offers a more compact and edgy appearance, with dimensions of 4210 mm in length, 1800 mm in width, and a height of 1593 mm. While both models feature a distinctive SUV look, the Kona stands out with a bit more roominess suited for families or those needing extra cargo space.
Under the hood, the Hyundai Kona offers more variety with engine options ranging from petrol and full hybrid to fully electric, providing power outputs ranging from 100 to 218 HP. It also offers multiple transmission choices, including a manual gearbox and dual-clutch automatic, catering to a broad spectrum of driving preferences. The Kona's electric variant boasts an impressive range of up to 514 km, thanks to its 65.4 kWh battery capacity.
Contrastingly, the Nissan Juke offers a mix of petrol and full hybrid engines with power outputs of 114 and 143 HP. Its transmission options include a manual gearbox and an automatic gearbox. While the Juke's lineup may not be as diverse as the Kona's, it provides a satisfying blend of performance and efficiency for its segment.
Both vehicles showcase respectable fuel efficiency figures. The Hyundai Kona's petrol variants can achieve around 5.7 to 6.3 L/100km, while its electric version uses 14.6 to 16.8 kWh/100km. The Juke also favors fuel efficiency, with consumption figures of 4.7 to 6 L/100km for its various engine modes. Drivers looking for a green option might lean towards the Kona, especially given its electric offering.
When evaluating interior space, both SUVs comfortably seat five passengers. The Hyundai Kona shines with a generous trunk capacity of 466 L, ideal for those who often carry larger loads. The Nissan Juke, slightly behind, offers 422 L to 354 L of trunk space, depending on configuration. Despite this, both vehicles provide ample room for a family outing or a weekend getaway.
Innovation is central to both models. The 2024 Hyundai Kona is packed with technology, including advanced safety features and a user-friendly infotainment system that's sure to please tech-savvy drivers. Similarly, the Nissan Juke emphasizes smart connectivity and safety systems, enhancing the driving experience through intelligent vehicle technology.
Choosing between the Hyundai Kona and Nissan Juke boils down to personal preference and priorities. The Kona offers a diverse range of engines, including an all-electric option, making it appealing for those interested in going green. Meanwhile, the Juke delivers a balanced performance with its bold design and innovative tech features. Both vehicles stand strong in the compact SUV category, enticing buyers with unique offerings tailored to diverse needs.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Nissan Juke is marginally cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Hyundai Kona costs 23,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,672 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Hyundai Kona uses 4.6 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Nissan Juke with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona offers markedly more power – delivering 218 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 75 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hyundai Kona is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.8 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 2.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Hyundai Kona delivers markedly more torque with 265 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 65 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Nissan Juke is marginally lighter – 1,274 kg compared to 1,370 kg. The difference is around 96 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Hyundai Kona offers only slightly more boot space – 466 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 44 L.
When it comes to payload, the Hyundai Kona carries moderately more – 490 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 63 kg.
The Hyundai Kona is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.
details
The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,400 - 31,800 £
|
Price
23,100 - 41,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
377 - 514 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
48.4 - 65.4 kWh
|
|
co2
105 - 136 g/km
|
co2
0 - 163 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
|
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,355 - 4,385 mm
|
|
Width
1,800 mm
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,580 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,300 L
|
|
Payload
405 - 427 kg
|
Payload
420 - 490 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 218 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 11.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
162 - 172 km/h
|
|
Torque
200 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 160 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C, E, F
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España