VS

Nissan Juke vs Hyundai Kona comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 23,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Juke or Hyundai Kona?

Nissan Juke vs Hyundai Kona: Key differences

Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • marginally lighter
details

Hyundai Kona

4.4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • very slightly more efficient
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Juke

Hyundai Kona VS Nissan Juke: a quick head-to-head

Hyundai Kona VS Nissan Juke sits squarely in the compact crossover fight, but they approach it from different angles: the Kona aims for roomy, calm practicality while the Juke leans into compact agility and personality. The Kona feels like a grown‑up B‑SUV—bigger boot, more rear legroom and a measured ride—whereas the Juke trades some of that practicality for a cheekier look, tighter packaging and sharper town manners. Pricing and trim choices often push the Juke toward the value end of the scale, while Kona buyers get more cabin space and efficiency tech for a bit more money. In short, this comparison will show Kona as the sensible daily companion and Juke as the city‑centric statement car with practical compromises. Read on for how those differences play out in real life rather than on a spec sheet.

Kona

Character and driving feel

The Hyundai Kona drives with a composed, confidence‑first character: predictable steering, settled suspension and an emphasis on comfort rather than drama. The Nissan Juke, by contrast, feels livelier in town—quicker steering and a smaller footprint make it flick into gaps and park with less fuss. That liveliness comes at a cost: the Juke’s firmer setup (especially on larger wheels) and sometimes abrupt dual‑clutch behavior around town give a more active but occasionally fidgety drive. So choose Kona if you prefer a relaxed, mature road feel and Juke if you want city agility and character even when it brings a bit more edge.

Juke

Comfort and long‑distance behavior

On long runs the Kona shows its strengths: more isolation from wind and road noise at cruising speeds and seats that suit hours behind the wheel make it the easier companion for motorway miles. The Juke, while stable, reveals more tyre and wind intrusion at higher speeds, particularly with larger wheels, so long trips feel less serene. Note that Kona hybrids can sound and work harder when pushed on the motorway, so Kona’s long‑distance advantage is strongest in its petrol or electric forms. If weekly autobahn stints matter, Kona tends to be the more relaxed choice; if most miles are urban, the Juke’s liveliness is less of an issue.

Kona

Practicality and everyday usability

The Kona clearly prioritises usable space: a larger boot, sensible load floor and more rear‑seat room make daily chores and family tasks easier without creative contortions. The Juke is compact and practical enough for city life, but a high loading sill, tighter rear seat and fewer handy stowage points mean lifting pushchairs or shuffling toddlers is more work. Hybrids accentuate that split—Kona keeps usable luggage space better, while Juke hybrids typically lose more boot volume. In practice, families and cargo‑minded buyers will appreciate Kona’s packaging; city buyers who rarely carry bulky loads will accept the Juke’s compromises for its smaller footprint.

Juke

Cabin mood, tech and day‑to‑day ergonomics

Both cabins have moved upmarket technologically, yet they present themselves differently: the Kona favours a clear, functional layout with big displays and plenty of physical controls for common functions, lending a straightforward, less fussy experience. The Juke punches with a more cockpit‑centric presentation, a tilted screen and a bolder interior personality that makes the driving position feel more engaged but also a bit cozier. Practical irritations differ too—Kona owners often mention intrusive warning chimes that need tuning, while Juke users complain about restricted rear visibility and some gearbox behaviour in traffic. If simple, intuitive daily usability matters more than style, Kona will feel easier; if you value a driver‑focused, characterful cockpit, the Juke delivers that moodier ambience.

Kona

Which buyer each car suits best

If you are a commuter or small family prioritising space, quiet cruising and sensible packaging, the Hyundai Kona will feel like the more grown‑up, flexible choice; its room and efficiency pay dividends over months of use. If you are an urban dweller or couple after personality, lower initial outlay and a nimble city car that stands out, the Nissan Juke makes sense despite its tighter rear seat and higher loading sill. Think of Kona as the practical, comfort‑first companion and Juke as the compact, style‑first city specialist — the right pick depends on whether daily space and long‑distance calm outweigh city charisma and a smaller price tag. Below you’ll find the technical comparison to map those real‑world impressions onto the numbers and options that matter for buying decisions.

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Kona
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Toyota Yaris Cross are two leading subcompact crossover SUVs that suit buyers wanting compact size, efficient powertrains and easy city driving. This comparison looks at how the Kona and Yaris Cross differ in driving feel, interior space, practicality and ownership costs so you …
Nissan Juke
Opel Corsa
VS
The Nissan Juke is the cheeky crossover that turns heads with its funky looks and raised stance, promising a slightly sportier feel and SUV attitude for buyers who want personality over practicality. The Opel Corsa, by contrast, is the sensible, well-rounded hatchback — more economical, easier to …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Juke

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Nissan Juke is slightly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Hyundai Kona costs 23,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,186 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Hyundai Kona uses 4.6 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Nissan Juke with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.

Kona

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona offers markedly more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 61 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hyundai Kona is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Hyundai Kona delivers markedly more torque with 265 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 65 Nm more.

Juke

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Juke is marginally lighter – 1,274 kg compared to 1,370 kg. The difference is around 96 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Hyundai Kona offers only slightly more boot space – 466 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 44 L.

When it comes to payload, the Hyundai Kona carries moderately more – 490 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 63 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Hyundai Kona is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,600
Kona

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 204 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.6 - 7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 380 - 510 km
details
Nissan Juke
Hyundai Kona

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details
Fahraufnahmen (7)
Exterieur statisch (2)
Exterieur statisch (12)
Interieur (25)

Reviews Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Ali Shan
8 Dec 2025, 11:29:27

For more space and Efficiency, I would prefer Juke 1.5 Specially Accenta.

Hyundai Kona

The Hyundai Kona is a compact crossover that pairs bold styling with practical everyday usability, offering a comfortable cabin and intuitive tech for modern drivers. Available in both conventional and electrified versions, Kona brings lively handling and strong value for buyers who want crossover versatility and standout character.

details
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-07_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-10_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-02_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-21_jpg

Reviews Hyundai Kona

4.4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Austin
21 May 2026, 19:30:33

Better fit for is 6'3" people

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
TOTO
20 May 2026, 11:23:42

The Kona is an SUV that delivers, especially in terms of driving comfort. It's noticeably easier to get into and settle into as you get older. Less feisty than the MG4 but slightly more economical.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans
23 Apr 2026, 11:02:05

More modern car with much more advanced technology than the S-Cross. The S-Cross is functional, economical and good, but dated.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Gorguet
10 Apr 2026, 07:38:34

Good car overall, but the finish isn't top‑notch — the paint is very fragile and chips at the slightest knock.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Kona
Kia EV3
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai Kona and the Kia EV3 comes down to whether you prefer a well-established compact crossover with a proven track record or a newer electric contender focused on efficiency and modern tech. I’ll walk you through how they compare across range, practicality, driving feel and …
Nissan Juke
Toyota Yaris
VS
Choosing between the Nissan Juke and the Toyota Yaris means deciding if you want a bold, compact crossover with distinctive styling or a practical, efficient small hatchback renowned for reliability. I’ll compare driving feel, interior space, running costs and features to help you pick the one that …
Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Ford Puma and Hyundai Kona are two of the most popular compact crossovers, combining practical interiors, elevated driving positions and city-friendly footprints. Choosing between the Puma’s engaging handling and efficient mild-hybrid options and the Kona’s broader engine range and tech-rich …
Hyundai Kona
Kia Niro
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Kia Niro are two popular compact crossovers that appeal to buyers deciding between sportier looks and practical efficiency. Though they share similar underpinnings and offer hybrid and electric options, they differ in driving dynamics, interior space, and feature priorities — …
Nissan Juke
SEAT Arona
VS
The Nissan Juke and SEAT Arona are rival compact crossovers that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling, yet they take markedly different approaches to design, driving feel and practicality. This comparison highlights the key strengths and compromises of each so you can quickly decide …
Hyundai Bayon
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Hyundai Bayon and Hyundai Kona are closely related compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want a small SUV, but they take different approaches to size, style and capability. This comparison will help you decide whether the Bayon’s city-focused practicality and value or the Kona’s wider engine …
Hyundai Kona
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Welcome to DriveDuel’s compact-SUV throwdown: the cheeky, city-savvy Hyundai Kona goes head-to-head with the sensible, grown-up Nissan Qashqai to see which one should park in your life. Expect feisty styling and nimble urban manners from the Kona, measured space and comfort from the Qashqai — we’ll …
Nissan Juke
Hyundai Kona

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,400 - 30,100 £
Price
23,600 - 41,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
380 - 510 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
105 - 136 g/km
co2
0 - 163 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,800 mm
Width
1,825 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
405 - 427 kg
Payload
420 - 490 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Power HP
115 - 204 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 Nm
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, F, A
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Hyundai
Is the Nissan Juke offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.