VS

Nissan Juke vs Mazda CX-5 comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 141 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Juke or Mazda CX-5?

Nissan Juke vs Mazda CX-5: Key differences

Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • very slightly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly lighter

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Juke

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Nissan Juke is considerably cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,606 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Juke uses 4.7 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.3 L/100km.

CX-5

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Juke offers very slightly more power – delivering 143 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Juke is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 10.1 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-5 delivers somewhat more torque with 238 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 38 Nm more.

Juke

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Juke is visibly lighter – 1,274 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 355 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers clearly more boot space – 583 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 161 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries noticeably more – 601 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 174 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Nissan Juke is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,400
Juke

Nissan Juke

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 114 - 143 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.7 - 6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
Nissan Juke
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details
Fahraufnahmen (7)
Exterieur statisch (2)
Exterieur statisch (12)
Interieur (25)

Reviews Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Ali Shan
8 Dec 2025, 11:29:27

For more space and Efficiency, I would prefer Juke 1.5 Specially Accenta.

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Nissan Juke
Opel Corsa
VS
The Nissan Juke is the cheeky crossover that turns heads with its funky looks and raised stance, promising a slightly sportier feel and SUV attitude for buyers who want personality over practicality. The Opel Corsa, by contrast, is the sensible, well-rounded hatchback — more economical, easier to …
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Lexus NX stands out with its luxurious interior and advanced technology features, offering a refined driving experience that appeals to upscale buyers. In contrast, the Mazda CX-5 impresses with its sporty handling and engaging dynamics, making it a favorite among those who prioritize fun …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and VW Tayron offer a fascinating comparison in the compact SUV segment, each catering to distinct driver preferences. The CX-5, renowned for its engaging driving dynamics and upscale interior, promises a spirited yet comfortable ride. Meanwhile, the Tayron, with its robust build and …
Nissan Juke
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Nissan Juke and Toyota Yaris Cross stand out for their distinctive designs and dynamic performance. The Juke offers a more sport-oriented driving experience with its turbocharged engine and agile handling, while the Yaris Cross impresses with its …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the Mazda CX-6e is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
Nissan Juke
Toyota C-HR
VS
If you want a pint-sized crossover with cheeky looks and a go-kart-ish chassis, the Nissan Juke delivers character and punchy turbo performance that’s grin-inducing in town. The Toyota C-HR, meanwhile, trades theatrics for grown-up virtues — hybrid efficiency, a calmer ride and a more …
Nissan Juke
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,400 - 31,800 £
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
105 - 136 g/km
co2
157 - 168 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Trunk capacity
466 - 583 L
Length
-
Length
4,690 mm
Width
1,800 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
1,695 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
2,019 L
Payload
405 - 427 kg
Payload
601 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Power HP
141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
195 km/h
Torque
200 Nm
Torque
238 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Power kW
104 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Mazda
Is the Nissan Juke offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.