VS

Nissan Juke vs Renault Kangoo Compact Van comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 25,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Juke or Renault Kangoo Compact Van?

Nissan Juke vs Renault Kangoo Compact Van: Key differences

Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • moderately more power
  • moderately more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly lighter
details

Renault Kangoo Compact Van

details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Juke

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Nissan Juke is somewhat cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van costs 25,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,788 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Juke uses 4.7 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.

Kangoo Compact Van

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Juke offers moderately more power – delivering 143 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 21 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Juke is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 10.1 s, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van takes 12.3 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Kangoo Compact Van delivers markedly more torque with 270 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.

Juke

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Juke is clearly lighter – 1,274 kg compared to 1,639 kg. The difference is around 365 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van carries considerably more – 901 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 474 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Kangoo Compact Van holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,200
Kangoo Compact Van

Renault Kangoo Compact Van

  • Engine Type Diesel, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 95 - 122 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 - 5.5 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 20.5 - 20.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 279 - 284 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
Dacia Sandero
Nissan Juke
VS
The Dacia Sandero and Nissan Juke both aim at buyers wanting compact, city-friendly cars, but they take very different approaches: the Sandero focuses on affordability and practical simplicity, while the Juke leans into distinctive styling and a more dynamic feel. This comparison will help you …
Nissan Juke
Renault Kangoo Compact Van

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details
Fahraufnahmen (7)
Exterieur statisch (2)
Exterieur statisch (12)
Interieur (25)

Reviews Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Ali Shan
8 Dec 2025, 11:29:27

For more space and Efficiency, I would prefer Juke 1.5 Specially Accenta.

Renault Kangoo Compact Van

The Renault Kangoo is a practical, no-nonsense compact van that turns urban deliveries and weekend DIY runs into a surprisingly easy chore. Roomy for its size, comfortable to drive and brimming with smart storage solutions, it’s a sensible pick for anyone who needs honest utility without drama.

details
r221168p
r221165p
r221166p
r221163p
r221155p
r221162p

Reviews Renault Kangoo Compact Van

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Juke
Renault Clio
VS
Choosing between the Juke and the Clio comes down to whether you want a compact crossover with bold styling and a higher driving position or a polished, practical hatchback focused on everyday usability. If you prioritise standout looks and a more commanding ride go for the Juke; if you want …
Ford Focus
Nissan Juke
VS
The Ford Focus and the Nissan Juke take very different approaches to the compact segment: the Focus focuses on balanced driving dynamics, practicality and refined handling, while the Juke trades conventional packaging for bold styling, higher ride height and city-friendly presence. Choose the Focus …
Nissan Juke
Opel Corsa
VS
The Nissan Juke is the cheeky crossover that turns heads with its funky looks and raised stance, promising a slightly sportier feel and SUV attitude for buyers who want personality over practicality. The Opel Corsa, by contrast, is the sensible, well-rounded hatchback — more economical, easier to …
Hyundai Kona
Nissan Juke
VS
The Kona and the Juke are two of the most popular subcompact crossovers, each standing out with bold styling and a city-friendly footprint. This quick comparison looks at how the Kona and Juke stack up on comfort, practicality, performance and running costs so you can decide which suits your needs.
Nissan Juke
Kia EV2
VS
Nissan Juke and Kia EV2 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Nissan Juke or the Kia EV2 is …
Fiat 600
Nissan Juke
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Fiat 600 and Nissan Juke showcase distinct personalities that cater to different driving preferences. While the Fiat 600 embraces retro charm paired with modern features, the Nissan Juke offers sporty aesthetics and a more robust performance profile. …
Nissan Juke
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Comparing the Nissan Juke and the Toyota Yaris Cross helps buyers choose between two compact crossovers with different strengths: the Juke offers bold styling and a punchy, fun-to-drive character, while the Yaris Cross prioritizes refinement, efficiency and everyday practicality. I’ll walk you …
Nissan Juke
VW Taigo
VS
Nissan Juke and VW Taigo go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Nissan Juke or the VW Taigo …
Nissan Juke
Renault Kangoo Compact Van

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,400 - 30,100 £
Price
25,200 - 37,000 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
20.5 - 20.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
279 - 284 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
105 - 136 g/km
co2
0 - 151 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
Curb weight
1,639 - 1,910 kg
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,800 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
405 - 427 kg
Payload
670 - 901 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Power HP
95 - 122 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.3 - 14.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 Nm
Torque
245 - 270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Power kW
70 - 90 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,461 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, A
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Renault
Is the Nissan Juke offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.