VS

Nissan Juke vs Tesla Model 3 comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 460 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 31,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Juke or Tesla Model 3?

Nissan Juke vs Tesla Model 3: Key differences

Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

Tesla Model 3

4.3 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Juke

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Nissan Juke is substantially cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Tesla Model 3 costs 31,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,320 £.

Model 3

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Tesla Model 3 offers significantly more power – delivering 460 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 317 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model 3 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.1 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Tesla Model 3 delivers substantially more torque with 660 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 460 Nm more.

Juke

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Juke is clearly lighter – 1,274 kg compared to 1,772 kg. The difference is around 498 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Tesla Model 3 offers visibly more boot space – 594 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 172 L.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Juke carries slightly more – 427 kg compared to 377 kg. That’s a difference of about 50 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Tesla Model 3 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £31,700
Model 3

Tesla Model 3

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 283 - 460 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13 - 16.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 534 - 750 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Tesla Model 3
ZEEKR 7GT
VS
The Tesla Model 3 and Zeekr 7GT take very different approaches to modern EV ownership: the Model 3 is a compact, performance‑leaning sedan known for brisk acceleration, precise handling and Tesla’s ecosystem, while the Zeekr 7GT emphasizes a roomier, more comfort‑oriented experience with premium …
Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
Nissan Juke
Tesla Model 3

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details
Fahraufnahmen (7)
Exterieur statisch (2)
Exterieur statisch (12)
Interieur (25)

Reviews Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Ali Shan
8 Dec 2025, 11:29:27

For more space and Efficiency, I would prefer Juke 1.5 Specially Accenta.

Tesla Model 3

The Tesla Model 3 slices through daily commuting with a silent, confident shove that makes petrolheads reassess their life choices, while its minimalist cabin feels more like a slick gadget gallery than a traditional car interior. For buyers after a fuss-free, tech-forward electric with plenty of grin factor and low running drama, it’s hard to beat—just don't be surprised when the car updates itself overnight.

details
0x0-Model3_06
0x0-Model3_RHD_03
0x0-Model3_12
0x0-Model3_09

Reviews Tesla Model 3

4.3 (7 Reviews)
rate
Trex
13 May 2026, 14:34:19

Excellent traction, relatively low energy consumption, driver-assist systems that are in a class of their own. On top of that, a very responsive steering system.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
dino999
18 Nov 2025, 08:47:05

I wanted to give 0 stars but you can't — unfortunately, it sucks.

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Juke
Opel Corsa
VS
The Nissan Juke is the cheeky crossover that turns heads with its funky looks and raised stance, promising a slightly sportier feel and SUV attitude for buyers who want personality over practicality. The Opel Corsa, by contrast, is the sensible, well-rounded hatchback — more economical, easier to …
Nissan Juke
SEAT Arona
VS
The Nissan Juke and SEAT Arona are rival compact crossovers that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling, yet they take markedly different approaches to design, driving feel and practicality. This comparison highlights the key strengths and compromises of each so you can quickly decide …
Kia EV3
Tesla Model 3
VS
The Kia EV3 arrives as a clever, value-packed challenger, promising space and sensible electric range, while the Tesla Model 3 still stands as the tech-forward benchmark for driving dynamics and Autopilot. This head-to-head pits practicality against polish to help you decide which makes more sense …
Nissan Juke
Toyota Yaris
VS
Choosing between the Nissan Juke and the Toyota Yaris means deciding if you want a bold, compact crossover with distinctive styling or a practical, efficient small hatchback renowned for reliability. I’ll compare driving feel, interior space, running costs and features to help you pick the one that …
Jeep Avenger
Nissan Juke
VS
Choosing between the Jeep Avenger and the Nissan Juke comes down to whether you prefer a compact crossover with Jeep’s rugged styling and practical options or the Juke’s quirky, city-focused design and agile handling. Below I’ll highlight the key differences in space, performance, efficiency and …
Nissan Juke
Toyota C-HR
VS
If you want a pint-sized crossover with cheeky looks and a go-kart-ish chassis, the Nissan Juke delivers character and punchy turbo performance that’s grin-inducing in town. The Toyota C-HR, meanwhile, trades theatrics for grown-up virtues — hybrid efficiency, a calmer ride and a more …
Tesla Model 3
Lynk & Co 02
VS
The Tesla Model 3 and the Lynk & Co 02 are very different cars: the Model 3 is a minimalist, electric sedan built around efficiency and software-driven features, while the 02 is a compact, connectivity-focused crossover aimed at practicality and value. This comparison zeroes in on driving dynamics, …
MG MG4
Tesla Model 3
VS
The MG MG4 and Tesla Model 3 face off in the competitive electric vehicle segment, each offering distinctive advantages for the discerning buyer. The MG4 presents itself as a cost-effective alternative, providing a commendable range and modern features at an attractive price point. Meanwhile, the …
Nissan Juke
Tesla Model 3

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,400 - 31,800 £
Price
31,700 - 50,100 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 16.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
534 - 750 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
105 - 136 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
Curb weight
1,772 - 1,929 kg
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Trunk capacity
594 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,800 mm
Width
1,850 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
405 - 427 kg
Payload
303 - 377 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Power HP
283 - 460 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.1 - 6.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 Nm
Torque
420 - 660 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Power kW
208 - 338 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Tesla
Is the Nissan Juke offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.