What drive types are available for the Nissan Juke?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the Nissan Juke deliver on the road?

The Nissan Juke reaches a peak output of 143 HP, depending on the model.

What is the fuel consumption of the Nissan Juke according to the manufacturer?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 4.70 L.

How large is the Nissan Juke’s battery?

The Nissan Juke comes with a 0.60 kWh battery.

How big is the Nissan Juke overall?

The Nissan Juke measures 4210 mm long, 1800 mm wide and 1593 mm high.

What drive types are available for the Volvo XC40?

The Volvo XC40 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Volvo XC40's engine?

Up to 197 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What is the fuel consumption of the Volvo XC40 according to the manufacturer?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 6.50 L.

What maximum speed does the Volvo XC40 reach?

The Volvo XC40 reaches up to 180 km/h.

What are the Volvo XC40’s length, width and height?

The Volvo XC40 measures 4425 mm long, 1863 mm wide and 1652 mm high.

Nissan Juke vs Volvo XC40 - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Juke @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Nissan Juke has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21400 £, while the Volvo XC40 costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 15377 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Nissan Juke manages with 4.70 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.50 L. The difference is about 1.80 L per 100 km.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC40 has a distinct edge – offering 197 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 54 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC40 is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 7.60 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.10 s. That’s about 2.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the performs better – reaching , while the tops out at . The difference is around .

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC40 pulls evident stronger with 300 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm difference.

Juke @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Nissan Juke is noticeable lighter – 1274 kg compared to 1688 kg. The difference is around 414 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC40 offers hardly perceptible more room – 452 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 30 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC40 performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1328 L, which is about 23 L more than the Nissan Juke.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC40 a bit takes the win – 532 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 105 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Volvo XC40 shows itself to be barely ahead and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)

Ali Shan
8 Dec 2025, 11:29:27

For more space and Efficiency, I would prefer Juke 1.5 Specially Accenta.

Reviews Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

@ Nissan Motor Corporation

The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …

Costs and Consumption
Price 21400 - 30100 £	Price 36800 - 47200 £
Consumption L/100km 4.7 - 6 L	Consumption L/100km 6.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity 0.60 kWh	Battery Capacity -
co2 107 - 136 g/km	co2 147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 46 L	Fuel tank capacity 54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1274 - 1405 kg	Curb weight 1688 kg
Trunk capacity 354 - 422 L	Trunk capacity 452 L
Length 4210 mm	Length 4425 mm
Width 1800 mm	Width 1863 mm
Height 1593 mm	Height 1652 mm
Max trunk capacity 1237 - 1305 L	Max trunk capacity 1328 L
Payload 405 - 427 kg	Payload 532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid	Engine Type Petrol MHEV
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 114 - 143 HP	Power HP 163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 10.1 - 11.8 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed 166 - 180 km/h	Max Speed 180 km/h
Torque 200 Nm	Torque 265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 84 - 105 kW	Power kW 120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity 999 - 1598 cm3	Engine capacity 1969 cm3