Compare performance (170 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (43,500 £ vs 27,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Primastar Transporter or Renault R4?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault R4 is substantially cheaper – starting at 27,300 £ , while the Nissan Primastar Transporter costs 43,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,198 £.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Primastar Transporter offers a bit more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 20 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Primastar Transporter delivers clearly more torque with 380 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 135 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Nissan Primastar Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Renault R4 is clearly lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,926 kg. The difference is around 416 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Primastar Transporter carries clearly more – 1,110 kg compared to 443 kg. That’s a difference of about 667 kg.
The Renault R4 comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Nissan Primastar is a no-nonsense transporter that pairs rugged practicality with a surprisingly civilized cabin, so you arrive with your tools — and your temper — intact. It may not steal glances at the lights, but its sensible layout and dependable nature make it the kind of van you’ll happily rely on day in, day out.
details
The Renault R4, affectionately known as the "R4," is a quintessential symbol of French automotive simplicity and practicality. This classic compact car, originally introduced in the early 1960s, won over numerous enthusiasts with its versatile design and dependable performance. Its no-frills charm and robust build made it a beloved choice for rural drivers and city dwellers alike, cementing its status as an iconic piece of automotive history.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,500 - 48,500 £
|
Price
27,300 - 32,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
409 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
178 - 184 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,926 - 2,075 kg
|
Curb weight
1,510 - 1,537 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
420 - 1,045 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,956 mm
|
Width
1,808 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
899 - 1,110 kg
|
Payload
385 - 443 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 170 HP
|
Power HP
150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
350 - 380 Nm
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
110 - 125 kW
|
Power kW
110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Renault
|