VS

Nissan Qashqai vs Mazda CX-60 comparison

Compare performance (205 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (29,600 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Qashqai or Mazda CX-60?

Nissan Qashqai vs Mazda CX-60: Key differences

Nissan Qashqai

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • markedly lighter
details

Mazda CX-60

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • a bit more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Qashqai

The rapidly evolving automotive landscape presents consumers with a plethora of choices, especially in the competitive compact SUV segment. Two standout vehicles vying for attention are the Mazda CX-60 and the Nissan Qashqai. Each brings unique features, cutting-edge technology, and performance capabilities that cater to different preferences. In this article, we will delve into a comprehensive comparison of these two models, examining various technical aspects and innovations.

CX-60

Design and Dimensions

The Mazda CX-60 showcases a bold and sporty design characterized by its dynamic, sleek lines and a muscular stance. With a length of 4745 mm, width of 1890 mm, and a height ranging from 1680 mm to 1688 mm, it offers a substantial presence on the road. The five-door layout seamlessly blends aesthetics with functionality, ensuring ample cabin space for passengers and cargo.

On the other hand, the Nissan Qashqai, measuring 4425 mm in length and 1835 mm in width while standing at 1625 mm in height, presents a more compact and agile silhouette. Also featuring a five-door configuration, it is ideal for urban environments where maneuverability is key. The Qashqai’s design emphasizes modern lines and a refined front fascia, appealing to a wide demographic.

Qashqai

Powertrains and Performance

The Mazda CX-60 offers an array of engine options, including a powerful 327 HP plug-in hybrid system, a diesel MHEV with up to 200 HP, and a potent 254 HP gasoline variant. Coupled with advanced automatic transmissions, the CX-60 provides a seamless driving experience across varying terrains. Notably, the plug-in hybrid variant boasts an impressive electric range of 64 km, catering to eco-conscious drivers.

In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai is equipped with petrol MHEV and full hybrid options, producing power outputs ranging from 140 HP to 190 HP. With a choice of manual and automatic transmissions (CVT), the Qashqai is designed for both performance and efficiency. The acceleration figures reveal that while the Qashqai can achieve 0-100 km/h in as fast as 7.9 seconds, it traditionally lags behind the CX-60’s top-performing models.

CX-60

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

When it comes to fuel consumption, the Mazda CX-60 shines with dramatically low figures, particularly in its hybrid variant, which achieves an astounding 1.4 L/100km. The diesel variant also performs admirably, consuming around 5 L/100km. This efficiency contributes significantly to its lower emissions, with CO2 figures starting from just 31 g/km.

The Nissan Qashqai's fuel consumption ranges from 5.1 to 6.8 L/100km, depending on the selected engine and configuration. Its emissions range between 116 g/km and 154 g/km, indicating that while it is efficient, it does not quite match the CX-60 in this regard.

Qashqai

Interior and Technology

Both vehicles impress with their interiors, highlighting modern design, quality materials, and advanced technology. The CX-60 boasts a spacious cabin with a trunk capacity of 570 liters, providing ample room for luggage and everyday items. Technological innovations include a user-friendly infotainment system and advanced driver assistance features designed to enhance safety and comfort.

Similarly, the Nissan Qashqai offers a comfortable interior with refined finishes and practicality. The trunk space measures between 479 and 504 liters, accommodating various cargo needs. The Qashqai stands out with its cutting-edge technology, offering a comprehensive suite of safety features and an intuitive infotainment system to keep drivers connected.

CX-60

Driving Experience

The Mazda CX-60 is constructed with a focus on engaging driving dynamics, delivering exceptional handling thanks to its rear-wheel drive layout in some variants and advanced all-wheel drive options. It caters to enthusiasts looking for a spirited and responsive driving experience, especially with its acceleration capabilities, reaching 0-100 km/h in as quick as 5.8 seconds.

Conversely, the Nissan Qashqai, while providing a composed ride, emphasizes comfort and practicality over sportiness. Its handling is surprisingly responsive for its segment, with various driving modes allowing drivers to tailor the experience based on road conditions. However, it does not exhibit the same level of athleticism as the CX-60.

Qashqai

Conclusion

In conclusion, both the Mazda CX-60 and Nissan Qashqai offer compelling options within the compact SUV market. The CX-60 excels in terms of performance, efficiency, and driving engagement, making it an enticing option for those seeking a robust driving experience. In contrast, the Qashqai prioritizes comfort and urban practicality, appealing to a broader audience seeking a reliable daily driver.

Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on individual preferences—whether one desires a sportier drive with advanced hybrid technology or a comfortably equipped SUV tailored for everyday ease. Both models undoubtedly deliver exceptional value in their respective niches.

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Qashqai
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
The Nissan Qashqai feels like the classier, more refined compact crossover—crisper handling, a plush interior and sharper infotainment—while the Toyota Corolla Cross is the sensible rival, offering rock-solid reliability, excellent economy and no-nonsense practicality that will age well. If you …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Qashqai

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Nissan Qashqai is substantially cheaper – starting at 29,600 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,066 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Nissan Qashqai with 4.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.

CX-60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers noticeably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 205 HP. That’s roughly 122 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Nissan Qashqai takes 7.6 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers markedly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 330 Nm. That’s about 220 Nm more.

Qashqai

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is markedly lighter – 1,420 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 470 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers moderately more boot space – 570 L compared to 504 L. That’s a difference of about 66 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries slightly more – 612 kg compared to 516 kg. That’s a difference of about 96 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-60 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £43,700
CX-60

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 63 km
details
Nissan Qashqai
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Nissan Qashqai

The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.

details
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_005
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_001
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_011
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_032
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_022

Reviews Nissan Qashqai

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
15 Feb 2026, 18:05:07

A car with lots of problems — more trips to the garage than anything else.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
Nissan Qashqai
Opel Grandland
VS
The Nissan Qashqai feels sharper on the road with refined handling and clever packaging, while the Opel Grandland answers with a roomier cabin and bolder looks that’ll please practical families. Pick the Qashqai for polished tech and a composed daily drive, choose the Grandland if you want more …
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …
Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Captur
VS
The Nissan Qashqai stays the sensible family favourite — roomier, better built and more composed on the motorway, so it’s the pick if you value comfort and practicality without drama. The Renault Captur, meanwhile, charms with bolder styling, clever packaging and nippier city manners (usually for …
Nissan Qashqai
Opel Mokka
VS
Unsure whether the Nissan Qashqai or the Opel Mokka is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Nissan Qashqai
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Nissan Qashqai stands out with its sleek design and efficiency, making it an ideal choice for urban adventures, while the Skoda Karoq offers remarkable practicality and interior space, appealing to families and long-distance travelers. Both crossovers come equipped with a suite of advanced …
Nissan Qashqai
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption
Price
29,600 - 39,900 £
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
63 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
98 - 152 g/km
co2
85 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,624 kg
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,835 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
446 - 516 kg
Payload
581 - 612 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
158 - 205 HP
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
260 - 330 Nm
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
116 - 151 kW
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Mazda
What drive types are available for the Nissan Qashqai?

The Nissan Qashqai is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.