Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Nissan Qashqai vs Skoda Karoq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (205 HP vs 190 HP), boot space and price (29600 £ vs 29100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Qashqai or Skoda Karoq?
Qashqai
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Karoq has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29100 £ , while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 523 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Nissan Qashqai manages with 4.50 L and is therefore barely noticeable more efficient than the Skoda Karoq with 4.90 L. The difference is about 0.40 L per 100 km.
Karoq
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Qashqai has a barely noticeable edge – offering 205 HP compared to 190 HP. That’s roughly 15 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Karoq is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 7 s, while the Nissan Qashqai takes 7.60 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Karoq performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 221 km/h, while the Nissan Qashqai tops out at 206 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Karoq pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 360 Nm compared to 330 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Qashqai
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Karoq is slight lighter – 1380 kg compared to 1420 kg. The difference is around 40 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Karoq offers hardly perceptible more room – 521 L compared to 504 L. That’s a difference of about 17 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Karoq performs somewhat better – up to 1630 L, which is about 183 L more than the Nissan Qashqai.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Karoq minimal takes the win – 549 kg compared to 520 kg. That’s a difference of about 29 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Karoq shows small but noticeable advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Nissan Qashqai
Skoda Karoq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £29,100
Skoda Karoq
Nissan Qashqai
5 (1 Reviews)
The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.
details
Skoda Karoq
4.6 (2 Reviews)
The Skoda Karoq is a smart, unfussy compact SUV that blends roomy practicality with a pleasantly composed driving character. It won’t turn heads at a car meet, but it will make daily life easier with clever storage, sensible ergonomics and a reassuringly grown-up ride.
details
Nissan Qashqai
Skoda Karoq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29600 - 39900 £
|
Price
29100 - 41700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
102 - 154 g/km
|
co2
128 - 173 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1420 - 1665 kg
|
Curb weight
1380 - 1655 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
|
Trunk capacity
521 L
|
|
Length
4425 mm
|
Length
4384 - 4390 mm
|
|
Width
1835 mm
|
Width
1841 mm
|
|
Height
1625 mm
|
Height
1624 - 1629 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1422 - 1447 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1630 L
|
|
Payload
466 - 520 kg
|
Payload
456 - 549 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 205 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 190 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 11.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
|
Max Speed
192 - 221 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 151 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 140 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Is the Nissan Qashqai offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.