Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Nissan Qashqai or Skoda Karoq fits your lifestyle better.
The SUV market is no stranger to fierce competition, and two models often compared for their blend of practicality, performance, and innovation are the Nissan Qashqai and the Skoda Karoq. As both vehicles roll out their 2024 models packed with new features, let's delve into a comprehensive analysis to discover which one might better suit your lifestyle.
When comparing engines, the Nissan Qashqai offers a mix of petrol MHEV (Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle) and full hybrid options. The Qashqai's engines range from 140 to 190 horsepower, favoring both urban efficiency and more spirited motorway trips. Easy maneuverability is ensured by a selection of transmissions, including a manual gearbox, CVT, and a reduction gearbox, catering to diverse driving preferences.
The Skoda Karoq also presents a couple of enticing choices with both petrol and diesel engines, ranging from 115 to 190 horsepower. Additionally, its transmission options encompass a manual gearbox and an efficient dual-clutch automatic setup, allowing for silky-smooth gear shifts. On paper, the Karoq edges slightly ahead if versatility and fuel options are what you seek.
For eco-conscious drivers, the Nissan Qashqai predicts fuel consumption between 5.1 and 6.8 liters per 100 km, with CO2 emissions varying between 116 and 154 g/km. In contrast, with the Skoda Karoq, you get a similar fuel efficiency range, consuming between 4.9 and 7.6 liters per 100 km. CO2 emissions hover from 134 to 174 g/km, depending on the engine configuration.
While both cars offer commendable efficiency given their SUV nature, the Qashqai's hybridity gives it a slight edge in lower carbon emissions, an appealing trait for those seeking greener motoring options.
In terms of dimension, the Nissan Qashqai measures 4425mm in length, 1835mm in width, and 1625mm in height. It comfortably seats five passengers and offers a generous trunk capacity of up to 504 liters.
The Skoda Karoq, slightly smaller with a length up to 4390mm, offers ample width and height at 1841mm and 1624mm respectively. The Karoq can seat five passengers comfortably and even slightly surpasses Qashqai's cargo space with a trunk capacity of 521 liters, ideal for family getaways or sports gear storage.
Innovation is the hallmark of both models. The Nissan Qashqai features advanced driver assistance and connectivity systems, enhancing safety and keeping drivers informed with its tech-savvy cockpit.
Skoda's Karoq rivals with its own suite of technological offerings, boasting a state-of-the-art infotainment system and a wide range of customizable digital displays, ensuring all necessary information is at the driver's fingertips while promoting an engaging driving experience.
The decision between the Nissan Qashqai and the Skoda Karoq ultimately hinges on individual needs and preferences. If you're after hybrid efficiency and innovative driver assistance, the Qashqai may be your best bet. However, if cargo space and a robust variety of engine types are your priorities, the Karoq presents a compelling case.
As always, personal preference will play a pivotal role, but both contenders stand tall in the SUV arena, promising reliable and enjoyable driving for the 2024 model year and beyond.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Karoq has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29100 £, while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29600 £. That’s a price difference of around 523 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Nissan Qashqai manages with 4.50 L and is therefore barely noticeable more efficient than the Skoda Karoq with 4.90 L. The difference is about 0.40 L per 100 km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Qashqai has a barely noticeable edge – offering 205 HP compared to 190 HP. That’s roughly 15 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Karoq is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 7 s, while the Nissan Qashqai takes 7.60 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Karoq performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 221 km/h, while the Nissan Qashqai tops out at 206 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Karoq pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 360 Nm compared to 330 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Karoq is slight lighter – 1380 kg compared to 1420 kg. The difference is around 40 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Karoq offers hardly perceptible more room – 521 L compared to 504 L. That’s a difference of about 17 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Karoq performs somewhat better – up to 1630 L, which is about 183 L more than the Nissan Qashqai.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Karoq minimal takes the win – 549 kg compared to 520 kg. That’s a difference of about 29 kg.
The Skoda Karoq proves to be shows small but notable strengths and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Karoq is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.
details
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
The Skoda Karoq is a smart, unfussy compact SUV that blends roomy practicality with a pleasantly composed driving character. It won’t turn heads at a car meet, but it will make daily life easier with clever storage, sensible ergonomics and a reassuringly grown-up ride.
details
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
|
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29600 - 39900 £
|
Price
29100 - 41700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
102 - 154 g/km
|
co2
128 - 173 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1420 - 1665 kg
|
Curb weight
1380 - 1655 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
|
Trunk capacity
521 L
|
|
Length
4425 mm
|
Length
4384 - 4390 mm
|
|
Width
1835 mm
|
Width
1841 mm
|
|
Height
1625 mm
|
Height
1624 - 1629 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1422 - 1447 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1630 L
|
|
Payload
466 - 520 kg
|
Payload
456 - 549 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 205 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 190 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 11.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
|
Max Speed
192 - 221 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 151 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 140 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España