Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Nissan Qashqai vs Skoda Octavia Combi - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (205 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (29600 £ vs 24400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Qashqai or Skoda Octavia Combi?
Qashqai
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Octavia Combi has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24400 £ , while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5185 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Octavia Combi manages with 4.40 L and is therefore slight more efficient than the Nissan Qashqai with 4.50 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.
Octavia Combi
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Octavia Combi has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 265 HP compared to 205 HP. That’s roughly 60 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Octavia Combi is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 6.50 s, while the Nissan Qashqai takes 7.60 s. That’s about 1.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Octavia Combi performs a bit better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Nissan Qashqai tops out at 206 km/h. The difference is around 44 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Octavia Combi pulls slightly stronger with 370 Nm compared to 330 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Qashqai
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Octavia Combi is hardly perceptible lighter – 1366 kg compared to 1420 kg. The difference is around 54 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Octavia Combi offers evident more room – 640 L compared to 504 L. That’s a difference of about 136 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Octavia Combi performs a bit better – up to 1700 L, which is about 253 L more than the Nissan Qashqai.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Octavia Combi slight takes the win – 534 kg compared to 520 kg. That’s a difference of about 14 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Octavia Combi is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Nissan Qashqai
Skoda Octavia Combi
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £24,400
Skoda Octavia Combi
Nissan Qashqai
5 (1 Reviews)
The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.
details
Skoda Octavia Combi
The Skoda Octavia Combi is the sensible family wagon that somehow turns grocery runs and long trips into a pleasant, unshowy experience — spacious, practical and built like it prefers reliability over flash. With smart touches, clever storage and a cabin that feels grown-up rather than frugal, it’s an easy recommendation for buyers who want maximum utility without sacrificing comfort or style.
details
Nissan Qashqai
Skoda Octavia Combi
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29600 - 39900 £
|
Price
24400 - 42300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
102 - 154 g/km
|
co2
113 - 157 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1420 - 1665 kg
|
Curb weight
1366 - 1553 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
|
Trunk capacity
640 L
|
|
Length
4425 mm
|
Length
4698 - 4709 mm
|
|
Width
1835 mm
|
Width
1829 mm
|
|
Height
1625 mm
|
Height
1455 - 1468 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1422 - 1447 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1700 L
|
|
Payload
466 - 520 kg
|
Payload
471 - 534 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 205 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 10.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
|
Max Speed
203 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
|
Torque
220 - 370 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 151 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, C
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Is the Nissan Qashqai offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.