Is the Nissan X-Trail offered with different drivetrains?

The Nissan X-Trail is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Nissan X-Trail's engine?

Up to 213 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What are the consumption figures for the Nissan X-Trail in liters per 100 km?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 5.70 L.

How much luggage fits in the Nissan X-Trail?

Depending on configuration, up to 585 L fit inside.

What drivetrain options does the MG HS/EHS have?

The MG HS/EHS is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the MG HS/EHS's engine?

Up to 272 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What are the consumption figures for the MG HS/EHS in liters per 100 km?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 0.50 L.

What is the MG HS/EHS’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 100 km.

What are the dimensions of the MG HS/EHS?

Overall, the MG HS/EHS is 4655 mm long, 1890 mm wide and 1664 mm high.

Nissan X-Trail vs MG HS/EHS - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

X-Trail

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

MG HS/EHS has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24000 £, while the Nissan X-Trail costs 34200 £. That’s a price difference of around 10166 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: MG HS/EHS manages with 0.50 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Nissan X-Trail with 5.70 L. The difference is about 5.20 L per 100 km.

X-Trail

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the MG HS/EHS has a noticeable edge – offering 272 HP compared to 213 HP. That’s roughly 59 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG HS/EHS is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 6.80 s, while the Nissan X-Trail takes 7 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Nissan X-Trail pulls noticeable stronger with 525 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 175 Nm difference.

X-Trail

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Nissan X-Trail offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, MG HS/EHS is barely noticeable lighter – 1625 kg compared to 1668 kg. The difference is around 43 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Nissan X-Trail offers slightly more room – 585 L compared to 507 L. That’s a difference of about 78 L.

When it comes to payload, Nissan X-Trail noticeable takes the win – 574 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 174 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the MG HS/EHS shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews Nissan X-Trail

5 (1 Reviews)

Reviews MG HS/EHS

5 (1 Reviews)

Mac Finn
29 Oct 2025, 11:27:52

Good perfomance and superbly low fuel consumption in daily use.

Top Car Comparisons

Hyundai Tucson

Nissan X-Trail

VS

In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Nissan X-Trail stand out with their distinct offerings. The Tucson impresses with its sleek design, advanced technology features, and spacious interior, making it a strong contender for families and tech enthusiasts alike. Meanwhile, …

Kia Sportage

Nissan X-Trail

VS

In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Kia Sportage and Nissan X-Trail emerge as standout contenders, each offering a unique blend of style, comfort, and innovation. The Sportage impresses with its bold design and advanced tech features, while the X-Trail is praised for its practicality and …

Costs and Consumption
Price 34200 - 50500 £	Price 24000 - 36000 £
Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.9 L	Consumption L/100km 0.5 - 7.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range 100 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 131 - 161 g/km	co2 14 - 173 g/km
Fuel tank capacity -	Fuel tank capacity 55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5 - 7	Seats 5
Doors -	Doors 5
Curb weight 1668 - 1961 kg	Curb weight 1625 - 1930 kg
Trunk capacity 177 - 585 L	Trunk capacity 441 - 507 L
Length -	Length 4655 - 4670 mm
Width 1840 mm	Width 1890 mm
Height -	Height 1663 - 1664 mm
Max trunk capacity -	Max trunk capacity 1291 - 1484 L
Payload 432 - 574 kg	Payload 400 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid	Engine Type Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail CVT, Reduction Gearbox	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 163 - 213 HP	Power HP 170 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7 - 9.6 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.8 - 9.6 s
Max Speed -	Max Speed 190 - 195 km/h
Torque 300 - 525 Nm	Torque 275 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 120 - 157 kW	Power kW 125 - 200 kW
Engine capacity 1497 cm3	Engine capacity 1496 cm3