VS

Nissan X-Trail vs Renault Arkana comparison

Compare performance (213 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan X-Trail or Renault Arkana?

Nissan X-Trail vs Renault Arkana: Key differences

Nissan X-Trail

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • a bit lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

X-Trail

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Arkana is markedly cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Nissan X-Trail costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,700 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Arkana uses 4.7 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Nissan X-Trail with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.

Arkana

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan X-Trail offers visibly more power – delivering 213 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 70 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan X-Trail is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 7 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 3.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan X-Trail delivers clearly more torque with 525 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 320 Nm more.

X-Trail

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Nissan X-Trail offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is a bit lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,668 kg. The difference is around 158 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan X-Trail carries noticeably more – 574 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 123 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Nissan X-Trail is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,200
X-Trail

Nissan X-Trail

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 163 - 213 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.9 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Arkana is the compact, coupe‑SUV you can buy today — affordable, practical and mildly athletic, with hybrid options that make it a sensible family car rather than a fashion statement. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is Renault’s sci‑fi manifesto: an electric, autonomous concept …
Renault Arkana
Renault Rafale
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Renault Arkana stands out with its sleek coupe-like design, appealing to those who prioritize style alongside functionality. Meanwhile, the Renault Rafale offers a more traditional SUV layout, emphasizing practicality and spaciousness for families and …
Nissan X-Trail
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Nissan X-Trail

The Nissan X-Trail is a roomy, no-nonsense family SUV that mixes sensible practicality with a quietly modern look, making it an easy choice for busy lives and weekend escapes. It drives with calm confidence, delivers a comfortable ride and sensible tech, and won’t demand drama while doing the everyday heavy lifting.

details
X-Trail - Dynamic High 22
X-Trail - Dynamic High 14
Nissan_Xtrail_High_043
Nissan_Xtrail_High_033

Reviews Nissan X-Trail

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
Marcin
17 Feb 2026, 12:21:57

I drive an Outback every day; I had an X‑Trail as a courtesy car while mine was in for service. First impression after a few kilometres of driving — the suspension is a disaster. You get the feeling this car picks up every single imperfection in the tarmac. Also, at idle the engine causes noticeably more vibrations in the cabin than the Subaru. On the plus side, a more ergonomic gear lever and 360° cameras. But I wouldn’t swap...

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Rafał
6 Feb 2026, 00:23:47

Beautiful, modern design, very good-quality materials, mega acceleration and power. Very modern, loaded with electronics. This is my second Nissan X‑Trail.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Shan Ak
24 Jan 2026, 14:20:58

I have 163 hp platinum premium pack . Car is going very smoothly and comfortable. Also powerful and useful details.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault Arkana

The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Sonja
8 Apr 2026, 14:14:58

We've been driving the Arkana RS Line mild-hybrid for almost five years — and we're mega satisfied. At first everyone turned to stare. It's a good car to cover motorway miles, and fuel consumption of about 6.4 l/100 km is acceptable. Since our contract is ending, we're parting with the Arkana despite the lovely years together and switching to the Symbioz full-hybrid 160 Alpine Line. Hopefully we'll have a great time with it too.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Renault Arkana and Renault Austral offer distinct advantages that cater to different buyer preferences. While the Arkana stands out with its sporty coupe-like design and agile handling, the Austral impresses with a more traditional SUV layout and spacious …
Nissan X-Trail
VW Tiguan
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Nissan X-Trail and VW Tiguan stand out with their distinct strengths. The X-Trail boasts a spacious interior and versatile cargo space, making it ideal for family adventures, while the Tiguan impresses with its premium interior quality and advanced tech features. …
Renault Arkana
Renault Captur
VS
Comparing the Renault Arkana and the Renault Captur, both models present unique offerings in the compact SUV category. The Arkana stands out with its coupe-inspired design, providing a sportier profile and an engaging driving experience, ideal for those seeking an adventurous edge. In contrast, the …
Ford Kuga
Nissan X-Trail
VS
In the competitive arena of compact SUVs, the Ford Kuga and Nissan X-Trail stand out with their unique offerings. The Kuga impresses with its sleek design and advanced technology features, providing a more dynamic driving experience. Meanwhile, the X-Trail shines in practicality and spaciousness, …
Hyundai Tucson
Nissan X-Trail
VS
Hyundai Tucson arrives with sharper styling, a high-tech cabin and punchy powertrain options — the gadget-forward, sporty choice for buyers who want flair and value. Nissan X‑Trail plays the practical card: roomier, more family-friendly and supremely comfortable on long runs, so pick the Tucson to …
Mazda CX-60
Nissan X-Trail
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Nissan X-Trail compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Nissan X-Trail
Dacia Bigster
VS
In the competitive SUV segment, the Nissan X-Trail showcases its versatility with a spacious interior and advanced driver-assistance features, making it a strong contender for families and adventure-seekers alike. Meanwhile, the Dacia Bigster appeals to budget-conscious buyers with its robust …
Citroen C5 Aircross
Nissan X-Trail
VS
Unsure whether the Citroen C5 Aircross or the Nissan X-Trail is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Nissan X-Trail
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
Price
34,200 - 50,500 £
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
131 - 161 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5 - 7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,668 - 1,961 kg
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Trunk capacity
177 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,840 mm
Width
1,821 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
432 - 574 kg
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 213 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 9.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
300 - 525 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
120 - 157 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Renault
What drive types are available for the Nissan X-Trail?

The Nissan X-Trail is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.