Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Nissan X-Trail vs Renault Arkana – Differences & prices compared
Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Nissan X-Trail or Renault Arkana?
X-Trail
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Arkana has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 28500 £, while the Nissan X-Trail costs 34000 £. That’s a price difference of around 5571 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Arkana manages with 4.70 L and is therefore evident more efficient than the Nissan X-Trail with 5.70 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.
Arkana
@ Renault Group Media
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan X-Trail has a distinct edge – offering 213 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 70 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan X-Trail is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.80 s. That’s about 3.80 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Nissan X-Trail performs to a small extent better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Renault Arkana tops out at 172 km/h. The difference is around 28 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Nissan X-Trail pulls convincingly stronger with 525 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 320 Nm difference.
X-Trail
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Nissan X-Trail offers noticeable more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Renault Arkana is somewhat lighter – 1510 kg compared to 1668 kg. The difference is around 158 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Nissan X-Trail offers a bit more room – 585 L compared to 480 L. That’s a difference of about 105 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Nissan X-Trail performs somewhat better – up to 1424 L, which is about 161 L more than the Renault Arkana.
When it comes to payload, Nissan X-Trail evident takes the win – 574 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 123 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Nissan X-Trail shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £34,000
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan X-Trail
Nissan X-Trail
The Nissan X-Trail is a roomy, no-nonsense family SUV that mixes sensible practicality with a quietly modern look, making it an easy choice for busy lives and weekend escapes. It drives with calm confidence, delivers a comfortable ride and sensible tech, and won’t demand drama while doing the everyday heavy lifting.
details
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Renault Arkana
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
Nissan X-Trail
Renault Arkana
|
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
|
@ Renault Group Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34000 - 50400 £
|
Price
28500 - 31900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.70 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
|
|
co2
131 - 161 g/km
|
co2
106 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1668 - 1961 kg
|
Curb weight
1510 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
177 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
480 L
|
|
Length
4680 mm
|
Length
4568 mm
|
|
Width
1840 mm
|
Width
1821 mm
|
|
Height
1720 mm
|
Height
1576 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1396 - 1424 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1263 L
|
|
Payload
432 - 574 kg
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
163 - 213 HP
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 9.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.80 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
172 km/h
|
|
Torque
300 - 525 Nm
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
120 - 157 kW
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1497 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Renault
|
Is the Nissan X-Trail offered with different drivetrains?
The Nissan X-Trail is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.