Is the Nissan X-Trail offered with different drivetrains?

The Nissan X-Trail is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Nissan X-Trail's engine?

Up to 213 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What are the consumption figures for the Nissan X-Trail in liters per 100 km?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 5.70 L.

What maximum speed does the Nissan X-Trail reach?

The Nissan X-Trail reaches up to 200 km/h.

How much luggage fits in the Nissan X-Trail?

Depending on configuration, up to 585 L fit inside.

What are the dimensions of the Nissan X-Trail?

The Nissan X-Trail measures 4680 mm long, 1840 mm wide and 1720 mm high.

Is the Skoda Octavia Combi offered with different drivetrains?

The Skoda Octavia Combi is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the Skoda Octavia Combi deliver on the road?

Depending on the version, the Skoda Octavia Combi delivers up to 265 HP.

How much fuel does the Skoda Octavia Combi use?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 4.40 L.

What are the dimensions of the Skoda Octavia Combi?

The Skoda Octavia Combi measures 4709 mm long, 1829 mm wide and 1455 mm high.

Nissan X-Trail vs Skoda Octavia Combi - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

X-Trail @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Octavia Combi has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24400 £, while the Nissan X-Trail costs 34000 £. That’s a price difference of around 9608 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Octavia Combi manages with 4.40 L and is therefore evident more efficient than the Nissan X-Trail with 5.70 L. The difference is about 1.30 L per 100 km.

Octavia Combi @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Octavia Combi has a a bit edge – offering 265 HP compared to 213 HP. That’s roughly 52 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Octavia Combi is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 6.50 s, while the Nissan X-Trail takes 7 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Octavia Combi performs to a small extent better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Nissan X-Trail tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 50 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Nissan X-Trail pulls noticeable stronger with 525 Nm compared to 370 Nm. That’s about 155 Nm difference.

X-Trail @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Nissan X-Trail offers evident more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Skoda Octavia Combi is evident lighter – 1366 kg compared to 1668 kg. The difference is around 302 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Octavia Combi offers barely noticeable more room – 640 L compared to 585 L. That’s a difference of about 55 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Octavia Combi performs a bit better – up to 1700 L, which is about 276 L more than the Nissan X-Trail.

When it comes to payload, Nissan X-Trail barely noticeable takes the win – 574 kg compared to 534 kg. That’s a difference of about 40 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Skoda Octavia Combi proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Octavia Combi is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews Nissan X-Trail

5 (1 Reviews)

Reviews Skoda Octavia Combi

Top Car Comparisons

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Octavia Combi

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW Golf Variant

VS

If your shopping list includes a boot that can swallow flat-pack furniture and weekend sports equipment without complaint, the Skoda Octavia Estate is the sensible giant with massive practicality and smart value, while the VW Golf Estate packages similar underpinnings into a neater, more refined …

@ Kia Corporation

Kia Ceed Sportswagon

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Octavia Combi

VS

The Kia Ceed Sportswagon and Skoda Octavia Combi compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.

Costs and Consumption
Price 34000 - 50400 £	Price 24400 - 42300 £
Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.9 L	Consumption L/100km 4.4 - 6.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 131 - 161 g/km	co2 113 - 157 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 55 L	Fuel tank capacity 45 - 55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type Estate
Seats 5 - 7	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1668 - 1961 kg	Curb weight 1366 - 1553 kg
Trunk capacity 177 - 585 L	Trunk capacity 640 L
Length 4680 mm	Length 4698 - 4709 mm
Width 1840 mm	Width 1829 mm
Height 1720 mm	Height 1455 - 1468 mm
Max trunk capacity 1396 - 1424 L	Max trunk capacity 1700 L
Payload 432 - 574 kg	Payload 471 - 534 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid	Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail CVT, Reduction Gearbox	Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 163 - 213 HP	Power HP 116 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7 - 9.6 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.5 - 10.7 s
Max Speed 170 - 200 km/h	Max Speed 203 - 250 km/h
Torque 300 - 525 Nm	Torque 220 - 370 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 120 - 157 kW	Power kW 85 - 195 kW
Engine capacity 1497 cm3	Engine capacity 1498 - 1984 cm3