Compare performance (195 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (30,100 £ vs 25,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 308 SW or Skoda Octavia Combi?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the ever-evolving landscape of family cars, two heavyweights stand out: the Peugeot 308 SW and the Škoda Octavia Combi. These two models exemplify the age-old adage that wagons are the unsung heroes of practicality and comfort. As we delve into their specifications, innovations, and overall demeanor, which one will claim victory as the better choice for you?
The Peugeot 308 SW features a modern and aggressive design with dimensions measuring 4636 mm in length, 1852 mm in width, and 1442 mm in height. Its stylish exterior is paired with a hint of French flair, making it a visual delight.
On the other hand, the Škoda Octavia Combi presents a slightly larger profile at 4698 mm in length, 1829 mm in width, and a height range up to 1468 mm. This ensures a tight balance between sturdiness and aerodynamic efficiency, catering to those who prefer a more robust look.
The 308 SW offers a plethora of engine choices, including petrol, diesel, MHEV, and even electric. Outputs range from a modest 130 HP to a muscular 225 HP. The electric variant boasts an impressive range of up to 410 km, and petrol consumption varies from 1.3 to 5.9 L/100km, depending on the choice of powertrain.
The Octavia Combi sticks with petrol, MHEV, and diesel engines. Power options go from 116 HP up to a potent 265 HP. Its petrol efficiency starts at 4.4 L/100km, making it a strong contender for those looking for fuel economy.
Peugeot provides both manual and automatic transmissions across its lineup, with dual-clutch and automatic gearboxes enhancing the driving experience. It remains front-wheel drive, appealing to those who prioritize straightforward handling.
Meanwhile, Škoda offers a bit more flexibility with the inclusion of both front-wheel and all-wheel drive systems, suited for varying driving conditions. Dual-clutch automatic transmission ensures a swift and smooth gear change.
Both wagons comfortably seat five passengers, promising a spacious travel experience. However, Škoda takes the lead in cargo capacity with a generous 640 liters in trunk space, compared to Peugeot's 608 liters. For families or adventure enthusiasts, this difference could be a tipping point.
The 308 SW shines with its electric variant having zero CO2 emissions and an advanced plugin hybrid option emitting only 30 g/km. It's a forward-thinking choice for environmentally conscious motorists.
While the Octavia Combi doesn’t offer an electric version, its petrol engines stay competitive with emissions starting at 114 g/km, aligning with stricter emission norms on a broader scale.
The decision between the Peugeot 308 SW and the Škoda Octavia Combi ultimately boils down to individual priorities. The Peugeot stands out with its variety of engine options and environmental efficiency, particularly with its electric model. Meanwhile, the Škoda Octavia Combi offers a larger cargo space and the versatility of an all-wheel-drive system, which might sway those with a penchant for long road trips or carrying more gear.
In this classic battle of wagon supremacy, both contenders have their distinct merits, ready to cater to varied lifestyle demands and preferences. Which one captures your heart?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Octavia Combi is somewhat cheaper – starting at 25,600 £ , while the Peugeot 308 SW costs 30,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,543 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Peugeot 308 SW uses 2.3 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Skoda Octavia Combi with 4.4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.1 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Octavia Combi offers markedly more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 195 HP. That’s roughly 70 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Octavia Combi is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 6.5 s, while the Peugeot 308 SW takes 7.7 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Skoda Octavia Combi is only slightly faster – reaching 250 km/h, while the Peugeot 308 SW tops out at 225 km/h. The difference is around 25 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Octavia Combi delivers moderately more torque with 370 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Octavia Combi is marginally lighter – 1,366 kg compared to 1,484 kg. The difference is around 118 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Octavia Combi offers moderately more boot space – 640 L compared to 551 L. That’s a difference of about 89 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Skoda Octavia Combi offers somewhat more capacity – up to 1,700 L, about 217 L more than the Peugeot 308 SW.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Octavia Combi carries only slightly more – 534 kg compared to 508 kg. That’s a difference of about 26 kg.
The Peugeot 308 SW is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Peugeot 308 SW blends French flair with estate practicality, dressing up daily chores in a surprisingly handsome package. Inside it's cleverly laid out and comfortable, and the composed, entertaining drive makes family duty feel a little less like a chore.
details
The Skoda Octavia Combi is the sensible family wagon that somehow turns grocery runs and long trips into a pleasant, unshowy experience — spacious, practical and built like it prefers reliability over flash. With smart touches, clever storage and a cabin that feels grown-up rather than frugal, it’s an easy recommendation for buyers who want maximum utility without sacrificing comfort or style.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30,100 - 43,800 £
|
Price
25,600 - 42,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.2 - 15.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
78 - 444 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
0.4 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 134 g/km
|
co2
113 - 157 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 52 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Estate
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,484 - 1,783 kg
|
Curb weight
1,366 - 1,553 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
467 - 551 L
|
Trunk capacity
640 L
|
|
Length
4,636 mm
|
Length
4,698 - 4,709 mm
|
|
Width
1,852 mm
|
Width
1,829 mm
|
|
Height
1,438 mm
|
Height
1,455 - 1,468 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,402 - 1,483 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,700 L
|
|
Payload
417 - 508 kg
|
Payload
471 - 534 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
131 - 195 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 - 10.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 10.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 225 km/h
|
Max Speed
203 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
220 - 370 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
96 - 144 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, C
|
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España