Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Renault Arkana vs Audi Q5 comparison
Compare performance (143 HP vs 367 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 46,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Audi Q5?
Renault Arkana vs Audi Q5: Key differences
Renault Arkana
3.8 (6 Reviews)
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Arkana
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Arkana is substantially cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Audi Q5 costs 46,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,914 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q5 uses 2.5 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.2 L/100km.
Q5
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q5 offers clearly more power – delivering 367 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 224 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q5 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 6.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q5 delivers substantially more torque with 580 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 375 Nm more.
Arkana
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is clearly lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,910 kg. The difference is around 400 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q5 carries visibly more – 565 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 114 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi Q5 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £46,400
Audi Q5
Renault Arkana
Audi Q5
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Renault Arkana
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
Audi Q5
The Audi Q5 feels like the sensible luxury choice — polished cabin materials, a calm ride and enough tech to keep commuters and weekend adventurers equally pleased. It won't shout for attention but will quietly check the boxes for buyers who want refinement, space and everyday usability with a dash of Audi charisma.
details
Renault Arkana
Audi Q5
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
|
Price
46,400 - 79,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 8.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
92 - 100 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
106 g/km
|
co2
56 - 189 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,510 kg
|
Curb weight
1,910 - 2,245 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
433 - 520 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,821 mm
|
Width
1,900 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Payload
490 - 565 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 367 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
Torque
340 - 580 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 270 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,968 - 2,995 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F, G
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Audi
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.