Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Renault Arkana vs BYD Atto 2 comparison
Compare performance (143 HP vs 212 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 27,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or BYD Atto 2?
Renault Arkana vs BYD Atto 2: Key differences
Renault Arkana
3.8 (6 Reviews)
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Arkana
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
BYD Atto 2 is barely cheaper – starting at 27,400 £ , while the Renault Arkana costs 28,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,037 £.
Atto 2
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the BYD Atto 2 offers noticeably more power – delivering 212 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 69 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Atto 2 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 7.5 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 3.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Atto 2 delivers visibly more torque with 310 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 105 Nm more.
Arkana
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
Both models weigh roughly the same – around 1,510 kg.
When it comes to payload, the BYD Atto 2 carries only slightly more – 490 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 39 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The BYD Atto 2 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £27,400
BYD Atto 2
Renault Arkana
BYD Atto 2
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Renault Arkana
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
BYD Atto 2
The Atto 2 is making waves in the electric vehicle market with its sleek design and impressive range. This innovative model combines cutting-edge technology with captivating aesthetics, making it a standout choice for eco-conscious drivers. With its spacious interior and advanced features, the Atto 2 offers both comfort and convenience for everyday use.
details
Renault Arkana
BYD Atto 2
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
|
Price
27,400 - 36,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
40 - 430 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
106 g/km
|
co2
0 - 41 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,510 kg
|
Curb weight
1,510 - 1,720 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
400 - 450 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,821 mm
|
Width
1,830 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Payload
260 - 490 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
Power HP
166 - 212 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.5 - 9.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
Torque
290 - 310 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
Power kW
122 - 156 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, B
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
BYD
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.