Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Renault Arkana vs Mazda MX-30 comparison
Compare performance (143 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 30,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Mazda MX-30?
Renault Arkana vs Mazda MX-30: Key differences
Renault Arkana
3.8 (6 Reviews)
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Arkana
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Arkana is only slightly cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Mazda MX-30 costs 30,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,391 £.
MX-30
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda MX-30 offers slightly more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 27 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda MX-30 is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 9.1 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.
Arkana
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is noticeably lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,849 kg. The difference is around 339 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Arkana carries a bit more – 451 kg compared to 402 kg. That’s a difference of about 49 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mazda MX-30 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £30,800
Mazda MX-30
Renault Arkana
Mazda MX-30
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Renault Arkana
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
Mazda MX-30
The Mazda MX-30 trades conventional EV practicality for a boutique vibe, wrapping easy urban agility and a stylish, artisan interior into a compact package that stands out in the crossover crowd. It’s ideal for city-minded buyers who value design and driving feel over long-distance trips, and its quirky details prove Mazda can be playful without losing its driver-focused soul.
details
Renault Arkana
Mazda MX-30
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
|
Price
30,800 - 37,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
85 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
106 g/km
|
co2
22 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,510 kg
|
Curb weight
1,849 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,395 mm
|
|
Width
1,821 mm
|
Width
1,848 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,555 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,137 - 1,155 L
|
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Payload
402 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
Power HP
170 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
140 km/h
|
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
Power kW
125 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
830 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.