Compare performance (158 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (21,100 £ vs 20,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Captur or Citroen C4?
In the crowded SUV market, the Citroen C4 and the Renault Captur are two models that stand out, each offering a blend of style, performance, and innovation. While both hail from esteemed French automotive houses, they bring distinct qualities to the table. This comparison delves into the technical aspects and innovations of each, helping you decide which might suit your automotive appetite better.
The Citroen C4 presents a length of 4350 mm, standing slightly longer than the Renault Captur's 4239 mm. This size difference is complemented by the C4's slightly wider stance at 1834 mm compared to the Captur's 1797 mm width, offering a broader and more stable presence on the road. Despite its compact design, the Captur’s height of 1575 mm gives it a slightly higher ride compared to the C4's 1525 mm.
The Citroen C4 offers an array of engine types, including petrol, mild hybrid electric (MHEV), and fully electric variants. With power outputs ranging from 101 HP to 156 HP, it caters to various driving preferences. The electric version of the C4 boasts an impressive range of up to 427 km, powered by a battery capacity of up to 51 kWh.
On the other hand, the Renault Captur also provides a versatile engine lineup with petrol, LPG, full hybrid, and mild hybrid options. Its power ranges from 91 HP to 158 HP. The full hybrid variant adds to its appeal, combining efficient fuel consumption and enhanced performance with a smooth automatic gearbox.
Both SUVs are designed with environmental consciousness in mind. The Citroen C4's CO2 emissions can be as low as 0 g/km for the electric variant, making it a strong contender for eco-friendly driving. For non-electric versions, C4 emissions vary between 106 and 134 g/km, with consumption rates from 4.7 to 5.9 L/100km.
The Renault Captur holds its own with CO2 emissions starting from 106 g/km, and a consumption range between 4.7 and 7.8 L/100km. Its full hybrid technology enables the highest efficiency in fuel consumption, marking it as a sustainable choice for today’s conscientious driver.
Both competitors feature front-wheel drive as standard across their ranges. The C4 offers options of dual-clutch automatic and a reduction gearbox for its electric model, delivering smooth power transitions and responsive handling. The Captur provides similar transmission choices, including both automatic and dual-clutch manual gearboxes, offering versatility for different driving preferences.
Inside, the Citroen C4 offers a generous trunk capacity of up to 510 liters, providing ample space for family trips and personal adventures. The Renault Captur, while slightly more compact, offers a practical trunk capacity of up to 422 liters, adapting well to urban environments where parking space is at a premium.
Both the Citroen C4 and Renault Captur bring strong attributes to the SUV market. If range, innovative electric options, or extensive cargo space are your priorities, the C4 might be the better choice. However, if versatility in powertrains and a higher ride height are more your speed, the Captur could be more suitable. Ultimately, both models deliver reliable performance, sophisticated French design, and a touch of innovation, ensuring you’ll be satisfied no matter your choice.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Citroen C4 is very slightly cheaper – starting at 20,600 £ , while the Renault Captur costs 21,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 566 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Captur uses 4.4 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Citroen C4 with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Captur offers barely more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Citroen C4 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Renault Captur takes 8.9 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Renault Captur is a bit faster – reaching 180 km/h, while the Citroen C4 tops out at 150 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Citroen C4 delivers barely more torque with 270 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 5 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Captur is marginally lighter – 1,323 kg compared to 1,403 kg. The difference is around 80 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Citroen C4 offers a bit more boot space – 510 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 88 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Renault Captur offers only slightly more capacity – up to 1,363 L, about 3 L more than the Citroen C4.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Captur carries somewhat more – 453 kg compared to 406 kg. That’s a difference of about 47 kg.
The Citroen C4 is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Captur is a cheeky little crossover that pairs city-friendly agility with a roomy, well-thought-out cabin and enough style to turn heads at the lights. It’s a sensible choice for buyers who want practical versatility and a dash of personality on their daily drives, without taking itself too seriously.
details
Citroën C4 wears its French eccentricity with confidence, pairing bold, sculpted styling with a supremely comfortable ride that turns mundane commutes into a gentler affair. If you value relaxed comfort, clever practicality and a car with personality rather than pretence, the C4 is a charming, sensible choice — and it won't make you miss the usual hot‑hatch theatrics.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,100 - 28,400 £
|
Price
20,600 - 32,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 4.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.5 - 15.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
354 - 427 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
46 - 51 kWh
|
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
co2
0 - 108 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1,323 - 1,441 kg
|
Curb weight
1,403 - 1,659 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
|
Trunk capacity
380 - 510 L
|
|
Length
4,239 mm
|
Length
4,350 - 4,580 mm
|
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
Width
1,800 - 1,834 mm
|
|
Height
1,575 mm
|
Height
1,520 - 1,525 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,363 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,250 - 1,360 L
|
|
Payload
447 - 453 kg
|
Payload
379 - 406 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
Power HP
110 - 156 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
150 km/h
|
|
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
Power kW
81 - 115 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España