Compare performance (130 HP vs 131 HP), boot space and price (25,700 £ vs 22,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Kangoo or Mercedes Citan?
In the world of high roof wagons, vehicles often share design elements and features, yet possess unique characteristics that set them apart. This is especially true when comparing the Mercedes Citan and the Renault Kangoo. As both models cater to a similar audience, their offerings in terms of performance, efficiency, and comfort are intriguing to compare.
The Mercedes Citan comes with versatile engine options. From petrol and diesel to electric, it covers a broad spectrum. Notably, the electric version provides a range between 265 and 280 km on a 45 kWh battery, offering an eco-friendly option to enthusiasts. The power outputs for the Citan range from 95 to 131 HP, promising promising acceleration and agility in city driving.
On the other hand, the Renault Kangoo delivers similar versatility with its petrol, diesel, and electric variants. Its electric model edges out slightly with a range of up to 285 km. The power range of the Kangoo stands at 95 to 130 HP, comparable to the Citan but with a slight advantage in higher power configurations.
Both vehicles offer manual and dual-clutch automatic transmission options, making them adaptable to varied driving preferences. These front-wheel-drive vehicles are designed to handle urban environments efficiently, offering smooth rides irrespective of driving conditions.
When discussing interior space, both the Citan and Kangoo provide practical solutions. The Mercedes Citan offers a trunk capacity of up to 551 liters, sufficient for most family and business needs. Seating capacity is fixed at five, ensuring comfortable accommodation for all occupants.
In comparison, the Renault Kangoo demonstrates versatility with seating options for five or seven passengers, depending on the configuration. The trunk offers generous storage space, with capacities reaching 950 liters in some variants—ideal for cargo-heavy trips.
Fuel consumption figures of both cars are competitive. The Citan's consumption ranges from 5.3 to 7.1 L/100 km for its different engine types, whereas its electric model consumes between 19.3 and 20.7 kWh/100 km. CO2 emissions align with efficiency classes from A to F, depending on the model.
The Renault Kangoo mirrors these efficiency classes with a similar fuel consumption range of 5.2 to 7.1 L/100 km. Its electric consumption is slightly higher, at 20.2 to 21.5 kWh/100 km, but remains competitive with a CO2 efficiency class ranging up to A for selective models.
Design-wise, both vehicles boast comparable dimensions, making them suitable for urban and suburban environments. The Mercedes Citan's length and width stand at 4498 mm and 1859 mm respectively, with height options reaching up to 1830 mm. The Renault Kangoo is slightly shorter in length at 4486 mm, with a bit more height at up to 1869 mm, offering a more imposing presence on the road.
Choosing between the Mercedes Citan and Renault Kangoo can be challenging as both offer exceptional value, performance, and efficiency. The Citan might attract those seeking a prestigious badge with slightly better urban maneuverability, whereas the Kangoo’s strengths lie in its cargo capacity and passenger flexibility.
Ultimately, deciding between these two well-rounded vehicles will depend heavily on individual priorities – be it brand loyalty, feature preferences, or specific use-case needs.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mercedes Citan is somewhat cheaper – starting at 22,400 £ , while the Renault Kangoo costs 25,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,271 £.
Both cars consume an average of 5.2 L/100km – no difference here.
In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes Citan is only slightly more efficient: consuming 19.3 kWh/100km compared to 20.2 kWh/100km for the Renault Kangoo. That’s a difference of about 0.9 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Renault Kangoo offers marginally more range – reaching up to 285 km, about 5 km more than the Mercedes Citan.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Citan offers barely more power – delivering 131 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 1 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Kangoo is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 11.6 s, while the Mercedes Citan takes 13 s. That’s about 1.4 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Mercedes Citan is visibly faster – reaching 183 km/h, while the Renault Kangoo tops out at 135 km/h. The difference is around 48 km/h.
Both models offer the same torque – 270 Nm.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Renault Kangoo offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Kangoo is barely lighter – 1,489 kg compared to 1,556 kg. The difference is around 67 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Kangoo offers substantially more boot space – 950 L compared to 551 L. That’s a difference of about 399 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Mercedes Citan offers slightly more capacity – up to 3,660 L, about 610 L more than the Renault Kangoo.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Citan carries barely more – 644 kg compared to 610 kg. That’s a difference of about 34 kg.
The Renault Kangoo shows a few small advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Kangoo is the pragmatic chameleon of small vans, marrying van-like practicality with carlike comfort and a cheerful, friendly face that suits both family runs and workday hauls. It's sensible, versatile and annoyingly useful — easy to live with, cheap to run and clever where it counts, so you get more space and fewer compromises than the price suggests.
details
The Mercedes Citan is a clever urban van that dresses sensible practicality in a surprisingly premium suit, making light work of deliveries and family duties without feeling like a workhorse. With a calm, car-like driving feel, clever interior packaging and the Mercedes badge up front, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want function with a touch of luxury and a wink of personality.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,700 - 36,200 £
|
Price
22,400 - 30,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 7.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 7.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
20.2 - 21.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.3 - 20.7 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
278 - 285 km
|
Electric Range
265 - 280 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 168 g/km
|
co2
0 - 167 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,489 - 2,041 kg
|
Curb weight
1,556 - 2,010 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
500 - 950 L
|
Trunk capacity
0 - 551 L
|
|
Length
4,486 - 4,911 mm
|
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
|
|
Width
1,860 - 1,919 mm
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
|
Height
1,838 - 1,869 mm
|
Height
1,811 - 1,830 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,500 - 3,050 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,979 - 3,660 L
|
|
Payload
459 - 610 kg
|
Payload
485 - 644 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 130 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 131 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 16.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13 - 15.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
130 - 135 km/h
|
Max Speed
132 - 183 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,021 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, A
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España