Compare performance (130 HP vs 625 HP), boot space and price (25,700 £ vs 71,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Kangoo or Mercedes EQE SUV?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Kangoo is considerably cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the Mercedes EQE SUV costs 71,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 45,839 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes EQE SUV is a bit more efficient: consuming 18.3 kWh/100km compared to 20.2 kWh/100km for the Renault Kangoo. That’s a difference of about 1.9 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQE SUV offers substantially more range – reaching up to 611 km, about 326 km more than the Renault Kangoo.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQE SUV offers substantially more power – delivering 625 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 495 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQE SUV is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.7 s, while the Renault Kangoo takes 11.6 s. That’s about 7.9 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Mercedes EQE SUV is substantially faster – reaching 240 km/h, while the Renault Kangoo tops out at 135 km/h. The difference is around 105 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQE SUV delivers substantially more torque with 950 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 680 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Renault Kangoo offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Kangoo is considerably lighter – 1,489 kg compared to 2,440 kg. The difference is around 951 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Kangoo offers considerably more boot space – 950 L compared to 520 L. That’s a difference of about 430 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Renault Kangoo offers clearly more capacity – up to 3,050 L, about 1,375 L more than the Mercedes EQE SUV.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Kangoo carries marginally more – 610 kg compared to 580 kg. That’s a difference of about 30 kg.
The Mercedes EQE SUV is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Kangoo is the pragmatic chameleon of small vans, marrying van-like practicality with carlike comfort and a cheerful, friendly face that suits both family runs and workday hauls. It's sensible, versatile and annoyingly useful — easy to live with, cheap to run and clever where it counts, so you get more space and fewer compromises than the price suggests.
detailsThe Mercedes EQE SUV wraps silent electric power in a sumptuous, tech-filled shell, offering a cocoon-like cabin that makes long journeys feel indulgent. It’s not a driver's toy but a sophisticated cruiser for buyers who want luxury, space and futuristic gadgetry without shouting for attention.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,700 - 36,200 £
|
Price
71,600 - 125,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 7.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
20.2 - 21.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 - 23.1 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
278 - 285 km
|
Electric Range
453 - 611 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
90.5 - 96 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 168 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1,489 - 2,041 kg
|
Curb weight
2,440 - 2,615 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
500 - 950 L
|
Trunk capacity
520 L
|
|
Length
4,486 - 4,911 mm
|
Length
4,863 - 4,879 mm
|
|
Width
1,860 - 1,919 mm
|
Width
1,940 mm
|
|
Height
1,838 - 1,869 mm
|
Height
1,672 - 1,685 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,500 - 3,050 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,675 L
|
|
Payload
459 - 610 kg
|
Payload
505 - 580 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 130 HP
|
Power HP
265 - 625 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 16.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.7 - 7.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
130 - 135 km/h
|
Max Speed
210 - 240 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
550 - 950 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
Power kW
195 - 460 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|