VS

Renault R5 vs Ford Puma comparison

Compare performance (540 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault R5 or Ford Puma?

Renault R5 vs Ford Puma: Key differences

Renault R5

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more efficient
  • barely more electric range
  • very slightly lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

R5

City Swagger vs Retro Chic

The compact crossover attitude of the Ford Puma reads like a modern city companion — poised, practical and a touch sporty — while the Renault R5 arrives with a wink to classic motoring and a design that doubles as a conversation starter. In short, one leans into familiar SUV cues and everyday usefulness, the other trades convention for personality and retro-futurist charm. Both will turn heads for different reasons, and choosing between them often comes down to whether you want understated utility or characterful identity.

Puma

What It Feels Like Behind the Wheel

The driving experience of the Ford Puma is set up to reassure: composed body control, predictable steering and a planted feel that suits busy streets and sweeping suburban roads alike. The Renault R5, by contrast, is punchy and eager, delivering a more animated and theatrical response that rewards enthusiastic inputs. If you prefer a calm, confidence-inspiring commute you’ll appreciate the Puma’s manners; if you like theatre and immediacy when you prod the throttle, the R5 brings more theatrics to the table.

R5

Comfort and Everyday Life

On the comfort front the Ford Puma feels like the practical choice for daily chores and family routines, with a forgiving ride and a layout that makes loading and living with the car straightforward. The Renault R5 takes a cosier approach, with cabin styling that feels boutique and clever packaging that suits urban dwellers, though it can be a little tighter for taller passengers in the back. Both manage to balance comfort with their distinct characters, so your priorities — cargo versus charm, space versus style — will tip the scales.

Puma

Controls, Screens and Everyday Usability

The Ford Puma favours familiar ergonomics and quick-to-use controls that reduce fuss on a hectic weekday, while the Renault R5 embraces a more modern, sometimes playful digital layout that rewards exploration and looks cutting-edge on the pavement. Practical touches and user-friendliness lean slightly toward the Puma’s pragmatic setup, but if you enjoy clever interfaces and a characterful infotainment experience the R5 will keep you entertained. Both cars are useable day-to-day, it’s just a question of whether you prefer straightforward or stylish interactions.

R5

Style, Presence and Personality

The Ford Puma projects contemporary SUV attitude — muscular lines and a purposeful stance that say “I’m ready for life’s errands” — whereas the Renault R5 trades that anonymity for personality, a look that’s deliberately nostalgic yet modern. Your choice here signals more than a design preference: it’s a statement about whether you blend in with practical polish or stand out with retro flair. Either way, both have strong visual identities that will attract very different kinds of compliments at the traffic lights.

Puma

Who Should Drive Each One?

City commuters and buyers who prize everyday practicality, easy loading and unflappable manners will find a natural home with the Ford Puma, which leans into familiar versatility and comfort. Style-conscious drivers, early adopters and those who want a distinctive, characterful urban machine would be more at ease with the Renault R5, which rewards those who enjoy making an entrance and living with something a bit different. Consider how you spend most of your miles: steady, flexible usefulness or personality-packed urban driving will point you in the right direction.

Stick Around for the Final Verdict

Both cars bring clear personalities and sensible strengths to the showroom floor, leaving the choice to your lifestyle and taste rather than a single clear advantage — and that’s precisely why this matchup is so interesting. Read on to see the full DriveDuel assessment and find out which contender takes the crown in our detailed comparison — the DriveDuel Champion will be revealed afterwards.

Frequently compared as well

Renault R5
VW ID.3
VS
The Renault 5 arrives as a cheeky retro reboot — compact, full of personality and perfect for nimble city living — while the VW ID.3 plays the sensible electric family car, offering more range, room and that reassuringly German calm. If you want fun and style for town runs choose the Renault 5; if …
Alpine A290
Renault R5
VS
The Alpine A290 is the sharpened, slightly posher take on the same small‑car bones — think keener handling, a firmer chassis and a price that winks “premium.” The Renault 5, by contrast, is the cheeky everyday charmer: more affordable, practical and easygoing, so if you want smiles without a second …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

R5

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Both models are evenly matched in price – each starts at 23,900 £ .

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is somewhat more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 14.8 kWh/100km for the Renault R5. That’s a difference of about 1.8 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers barely more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 12 km more than the Renault R5.

Puma

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault R5 offers significantly more power – delivering 540 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 372 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault R5 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.5 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault R5 delivers clearly more torque with 4,800 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 4,510 Nm more.

R5

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is very slightly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,447 kg. The difference is around 131 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries a bit more – 469 kg compared to 418 kg. That’s a difference of about 51 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault R5 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
R5

Renault R5

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 122 - 540 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 15.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 307 - 405 km
details
Renault R5
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault R5

The Renault 5 is a cheeky city car that marries retro charm with modern flair, its playful looks promising smiles before you even start the engine. Practical enough for daily life yet lively enough to make short trips feel like mini adventures, it’s an irresistible choice for buyers who prefer personality to bland practicality.

details
D9BB3E56-4B0D-4E48-A734-11A1714B92A5
79A3C149-BC71-4BE3-A149-986DD84D251C
DDEACB99-545B-4C72-B12C-AB35E7B77365

Reviews Renault R5

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Walter
4 Nov 2025, 21:42:46

Practical, nimble, and fun to drive. For rather small drivers up to 1.75 m there's plenty of space even on the back seat. Useful driver-assist systems, and Android Auto works well. Very economical in summer. In winter a lot of energy is used in the first five minutes to bring the battery up to 20°C, which makes consumption on short winter trips very high.

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Renault R5
Nissan Micra
VS
The cheeky, retro-modern Renault 5 squares up against the urbane, sensible Nissan Micra — two compact contenders fighting for your city keys. We’ll compare style, practicality, driving feel and running costs to find out which is the smarter buy for everyday life.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
CUPRA Born
Renault R5
VS
The CUPRA Born feels grown-up and focused — a proper hot‑hatch–inspired EV with genuine pace, sensible range and more practical space than its looks suggest, while the Renault 5 is a cheeky, retro‑flavoured city car built to charm tight streets rather than scorch the autobahn. Choose the Born if …
BYD Dolphin
Renault R5
VS
If you want no-nonsense electric practicality and impressive value for daily miles, the BYD Dolphin delivers usable range, clever packaging and tech that actually matters without breaking the bank. The Renault 5, meanwhile, sacrifices a little practicality for irresistible retro charm and …
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
The Ford Puma and VW T‑Cross go head-to-head in the compact crossover class — one flirty and fun, the other sensible and steady — both promising SUV looks without the bulk. We’ll pit the Puma’s lively handling and clever storage tricks against the T‑Cross’s comfort-first setup and family-friendly …
Ford Puma
Lexus LBX
VS
Small crossover clash: the Ford Puma brings cheeky driving dynamics and clever practicality, while the Lexus LBX counters with quiet refinement and premium flair. Pick the Puma if you want fun and value, choose the LBX if you crave comfort and a luxury badge — either way, you’ll be trading up from …
Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its striking design and impressive driving dynamics, making it a popular choice for those seeking a sporty feel. Meanwhile, the SEAT Arona appeals to buyers with its spacious interior and efficient engine options, offering …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Renault R5
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 137,100 £
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 15.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
307 - 405 km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Battery Capacity
40 - 52 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
3 - 5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,447 - 1,524 kg
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
3,922 - 4,080 mm
Length
-
Width
1,744 - 2,030 mm
Width
1,805 mm
Height
1,380 - 1,498 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,106 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
396 - 418 kg
Payload
367 - 469 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
122 - 540 HP
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.5 - 9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
150 - 270 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
225 - 4,800 Nm
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
90 - 397 kW
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
999 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,027
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
Brand
Renault
Brand
Ford
What drivetrain options does the Renault R5 have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.