VS

Skoda Elroq vs smart #5 comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 646 HP), boot space and price (32,000 £ vs 39,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Elroq or smart #5?

Skoda Elroq vs smart #5: Key differences

Skoda Elroq

4.5 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • very slightly lighter
details

smart #5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • marginally more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Elroq

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Elroq is markedly cheaper – starting at 32,000 £ , while the smart #5 costs 39,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,294 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Elroq is clearly more efficient: consuming 15.1 kWh/100km compared to 18.4 kWh/100km for the smart #5. That’s a difference of about 3.3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the smart #5 offers marginally more range – reaching up to 590 km, about 16 km more than the Skoda Elroq.

#5

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the smart #5 offers clearly more power – delivering 646 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 306 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the smart #5 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Skoda Elroq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the smart #5 delivers barely more torque with 710 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 31 Nm more.

Elroq

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Elroq is very slightly lighter – 2,036 kg compared to 2,200 kg. The difference is around 164 kg.

Looking at boot space, the smart #5 offers markedly more boot space – 630 L compared to 470 L. That’s a difference of about 160 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Elroq carries marginally more – 549 kg compared to 502 kg. That’s a difference of about 47 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The smart #5 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £39,300
#5

smart #5

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 340 - 646 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 18.4 - 19.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 465 - 590 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …
Skoda Elroq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Elroq and the Toyota C‑HR comes down to practicality versus personality in the compact crossover class. The Elroq emphasises roomy, clever packaging and value, while the C‑HR focuses on bold styling and efficient drivetrains—pick the Elroq for everyday versatility or the …
Skoda Elroq
smart #5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Elroq

The Skoda Elroq is a practical and well-rounded compact SUV that blends clever packaging with a calm, comfortable ride. It offers a sensible interior, straightforward technology and a value-focused approach, making it a particularly good choice for families and everyday drivers.

details
1_skoda_elroq_166e0554
2_skoda_elroq_b393d405
28_skoda_elroq_3a5d05f5

Reviews Skoda Elroq

4.5 (8 Reviews)
rate
Dirk
16 May 2026, 17:53:06

For me personally, compared directly with the ID4 "GTX", the Elroq is the slightly more mature and better-thought-out car for everyday use. It offers better ride comfort, software that runs a bit more smoothly for me, and by far the nicer design.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Gerry
15 May 2026, 09:17:17

First electric buy, so glad we chose the Elroq. Everything is so intuitive, car very spacious comfortable and nicely appointed, everything just feels right. Turning circle of 9.3M is so useful for such a largish car. Only small gripe is it's has quite a bit of road noise at 100KPH plus, absolutely fine below .

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Caelin
14 May 2026, 14:15:42

EV built for 80 km/h roads; range is very disappointing if you use the highway daily. You won't find this in the specifications. Which means in hindsight it wasn't the right choice.
Comfort fine.
Car catches a lot of wind; a lot of wind noise/whistling.
It's a shame that you have to reset a number of functions every time you start; no automatic memory.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Kay
2 Mar 2026, 11:27:36

We’ve been driving the Elroq 85 Sportline for four weeks. Nice SUV — functional and not overdone. Downside for me: software issues. Infotainment crashed once so far, and the traffic-sign recognition isn’t updating (often shows outdated roadworks).

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
ygfg
16 Feb 2026, 01:00:58

yg

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

smart #5

The Smart #5 continues to build on the brand's legacy of compact and efficient urban vehicles, now infused with a more modern and stylish design. Its sleek appearance is complemented by a spacious interior, offering comfort without compromising its compact nature. This model is ideal for city dwellers seeking a blend of innovation, practicality, and style in their daily drives.

details
1920_smart-hashtag5-ptd-brabus-4x3-009 (1)
1920_smart-hashtag5-ptd-brabus-4x3-005
1920_smart-hashtag5-ptd-brabus-4x3-014
1920_smart-hashtag5-ptd-brabus-4x3-004

Reviews smart #5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Stefan
31 Jan 2026, 22:25:16

I spent a weekend with the Brabus #5 and I’m thrilled! Extremely quiet, even at just under 220 km/h. Very good ride comfort, especially if, like me, you prefer a softer setup for better suspension comfort!
Brutal acceleration that only really hits from about 50 km/h and culminates in a 0–200 km/h sprint in 10.2 seconds… There are almost no cars up to roughly 1,000 hp that are faster!
The actual charging performance is, I believe, the best of any passenger car available in the EU (only Zeekr shows a little more on paper, but probably not in real life) — it charges at peaks up to 425 kW! 10–80% in 13 minutes and 5–100% in 28 minutes.
The fit and finish are in places better than the Mercedes E‑Class...

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Stefan
4 Dec 2025, 21:11:24

Apart from the hopefully soon improved/reduced chimes and the horrendously hard-to-reach mute for the speed warning, the car is really a knockout!
Very, very quiet, comfortable, extremely fast (Brabus version), great build quality, great equipment!

Frequently compared as well

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two …
Volvo EX40
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Volvo EX40 and Skoda Elroq offer contemporary takes on the small SUV segment, but they aim at different buyers — Volvo leans toward premium refinement while Skoda focuses on pragmatic value and space. This comparison will look at driving character, interior practicality, technology and running …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Elroq
VS
Comparing the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Elroq helps you decide between two different approaches to modern motoring. I’ll focus on range, interior space, driving dynamics, technology and ownership costs so you can pick the one that best matches your priorities.
VW ID.3
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the VW ID.3 and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a nimble, hatchback-style EV focused on urban driving or a slightly more spacious, crossover-style model prioritizing practicality. This comparison looks at range, interior space, driving feel and overall value to help …
Mercedes GLB
smart #5
VS
The Mercedes GLB is a sensible, slightly boxy premium compact SUV that delivers real-world space, family practicality and a composed long-distance ride, while the smart #5 is a punchy electric crossover that trades rear-seat room for sharp styling, low running costs and urban agility. If you …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Elroq
VS
Deciding between the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you value Audi’s premium feel and refined driving experience or Skoda’s clever packaging and better value. The Q4 e-tron focuses on high-quality materials, tech and a composed ride, while the Elroq prioritises interior …
BYD Atto 3
Skoda Elroq
VS
Comparing the BYD Atto 3 and the Skoda Elroq brings together a tech-forward Chinese electric crossover and a more traditionally engineered European compact SUV. I’ll highlight the key differences in driving range, interior space, features and running costs so you can quickly see which one fits your …
Skoda Karoq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Deciding between the Skoda Karoq and the Skoda Elroq means choosing between a proven, practical compact SUV and Skoda’s newer, more tech‑driven contender. I’ll compare their space, driving feel, equipment and running costs so you can pick the one that best fits your everyday needs.
Skoda Elroq
smart #5

Costs and Consumption
Price
32,000 - 47,000 £
Price
39,300 - 52,200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 16.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.4 - 19.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
441 - 574 km
Electric Range
465 - 590 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
74.4 - 94 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,036 - 2,255 kg
Curb weight
2,200 - 2,378 kg
Trunk capacity
470 L
Trunk capacity
630 L
Length
-
Length
4,695 mm
Width
1,884 mm
Width
1,920 mm
Height
-
Height
1,705 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,530 L
Payload
482 - 549 kg
Payload
475 - 502 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Power HP
340 - 646 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
200 - 210 km/h
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
373 - 710 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Power kW
250 - 475 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
smart
What drive types are available for the Skoda Elroq?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.