Compare performance (211 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (22,200 £ vs 18,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Epiq or Mitsubishi Colt?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mitsubishi Colt is markedly cheaper – starting at 18,200 £ , while the Skoda Epiq costs 22,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,038 £.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Epiq offers markedly more power – delivering 211 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Epiq is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.1 s, while the Mitsubishi Colt takes 9.3 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Epiq delivers considerably more torque with 290 Nm compared to 160 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Colt is noticeably lighter – 1,189 kg compared to 1,625 kg. The difference is around 436 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Epiq offers moderately more boot space – 475 L compared to 391 L. That’s a difference of about 84 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Epiq carries somewhat more – 455 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 70 kg.
The Skoda Epiq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
22,200 - 30,500 £
|
Price
18,200 - 25,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.7 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
310 - 440 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
96 - 119 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,625 - 1,642 kg
|
Curb weight
1,189 - 1,380 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
475 L
|
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,053 mm
|
|
Width
1,798 mm
|
Width
1,798 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,439 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1,069 L
|
|
Payload
438 - 455 kg
|
Payload
381 - 385 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 211 HP
|
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
174 km/h
|
|
Torque
267 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 155 kW
|
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|