What drive types are available for the Skoda Kodiaq?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Skoda Kodiaq?

Depending on the version, the Skoda Kodiaq delivers up to 265 HP.

What is the fuel consumption of the Skoda Kodiaq according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.40 L.

What is the Skoda Kodiaq’s maximum WLTP range?

According to WLTP, the Skoda Kodiaq can travel up to 123 km on a single charge.

How large is the Skoda Kodiaq’s battery?

The battery capacity is 19.70 kWh.

What is the top speed of the Skoda Kodiaq?

The Skoda Kodiaq reaches up to 231 km/h.

How big is the Skoda Kodiaq overall?

Length 4758 mm, width 1864 mm, height 1679 mm – those are the dimensions of the Skoda Kodiaq.

What drivetrain options does the MG HS/EHS have?

The MG HS/EHS is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the MG HS/EHS's engine?

Up to 272 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What are the consumption figures for the MG HS/EHS in liters per 100 km?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 0.50 L.

What is the MG HS/EHS’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 100 km.

What are the dimensions of the MG HS/EHS?

Overall, the MG HS/EHS is 4655 mm long, 1890 mm wide and 1664 mm high.

Skoda Kodiaq vs MG HS/EHS – Which model proves itself in everyday driving? Specs, differences & prices compared

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

MG HS/EHS has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24000 £, while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 12857 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore evident more efficient than the MG HS/EHS with 0.50 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Skoda Kodiaq performs to a small extent better – achieving up to 123 km, about 23 km more than the MG HS/EHS.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the MG HS/EHS has a barely noticeable edge – offering 272 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 7 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the MG HS/EHS takes 6.80 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs somewhat better – reaching 231 km/h, while the MG HS/EHS tops out at 195 km/h. The difference is around 36 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls a bit stronger with 400 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm difference.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, MG HS/EHS is minimal lighter – 1625 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 59 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers decisively more room – 910 L compared to 507 L. That’s a difference of about 403 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs evident better – up to 2105 L, which is about 621 L more than the MG HS/EHS.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq clearly perceptible takes the win – 563 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 163 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Skoda Kodiaq shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details