Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Skoda Octavia Combi vs Land Rover Range Rover comparison
Compare performance (204 HP vs 550 HP), boot space and price (25,600 £ vs 125,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Octavia Combi or Land Rover Range Rover?
Skoda Octavia Combi vs Land Rover Range Rover: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Octavia Combi
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Octavia Combi is substantially cheaper – starting at 25,600 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover costs 125,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 99,651 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover uses 2.8 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Skoda Octavia Combi with 4.4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.6 L/100km.
Range Rover
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover offers significantly more power – delivering 550 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 346 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Skoda Octavia Combi takes 6.7 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover delivers clearly more torque with 800 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 440 Nm more.
Octavia Combi
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Land Rover Range Rover offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Octavia Combi is clearly lighter – 1,366 kg compared to 2,504 kg. The difference is around 1,138 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover offers markedly more boot space – 818 L compared to 640 L. That’s a difference of about 178 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover carries noticeably more – 846 kg compared to 534 kg. That’s a difference of about 312 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Land Rover Range Rover stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £125,200
Land Rover Range Rover
Skoda Octavia Combi
Land Rover Range Rover
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Skoda Octavia Combi
The Skoda Octavia Combi is a practical, well‑packaged estate that delivers generous and flexible interior space ideal for families or active owners. Its sensible cabin layout, comfortable ride and solid reputation for reliability make it a pragmatic choice for buyers who value utility over flash.
details
Land Rover Range Rover
The Range Rover wraps unabashed luxury and genuine off-road capability into a silhouette that still manages to look effortlessly elegant whether parked outside a city hotel or splashing through a muddy trail. Inside, it’s a cocoon of soft leathers, refined materials and serene ride quality that makes long journeys feel like private-jet comfort — ideal for buyers who want a plush cruiser that can also go where lesser SUVs won’t.
details
Skoda Octavia Combi
Land Rover Range Rover
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,600 - 39,600 £
|
Price
125,200 - 275,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 11.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
115 - 116 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
113 - 157 g/km
|
co2
62 - 267 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Estate
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,366 - 1,553 kg
|
Curb weight
2,504 - 2,810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
640 L
|
Trunk capacity
212 - 818 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,829 mm
|
Width
2,047 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
502 - 534 kg
|
Payload
645 - 846 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 204 HP
|
Power HP
300 - 550 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.7 - 10.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
220 - 360 Nm
|
Torque
550 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
|
Power kW
221 - 405 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,997 - 4,395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.