VS

Skoda Octavia Combi vs Mercedes GLC EQ comparison

Compare performance (204 HP vs 489 HP), boot space and price (25,600 £ vs 61,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Octavia Combi or Mercedes GLC EQ?

Skoda Octavia Combi vs Mercedes GLC EQ: Key differences

Skoda Octavia Combi

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • significantly lighter
  • slightly more trunk space
details

Mercedes GLC EQ

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Octavia Combi

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Octavia Combi is substantially cheaper – starting at 25,600 £ , while the Mercedes GLC EQ costs 61,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 35,521 £.

GLC EQ

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes GLC EQ offers significantly more power – delivering 489 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 285 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes GLC EQ is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.3 s, while the Skoda Octavia Combi takes 6.7 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes GLC EQ delivers significantly more torque with 800 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 440 Nm more.

Octavia Combi

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Octavia Combi is significantly lighter – 1,366 kg compared to 2,535 kg. The difference is around 1,169 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Octavia Combi offers slightly more boot space – 640 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 70 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Octavia Combi carries marginally more – 534 kg compared to 505 kg. That’s a difference of about 29 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes GLC EQ is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £61,100
GLC EQ

Mercedes GLC EQ

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 489 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 645 - 714 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Octavia Combi
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
VS
The Skoda Octavia Combi and the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports are two of the most practical estate cars on the market, each promising roomy cabins and sensible running costs for families and commuters. This comparison focuses on cargo space, fuel efficiency, driving dynamics and overall value to …
Land Rover Range Rover
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
Comparing the Range Rover with the Mercedes‑GLC (the electrified Mercedes‑EQ version) puts two different luxury philosophies head to head: the Range Rover offers commanding presence, traditional opulence and genuine off‑road ability, while the GLC EQ focuses on compact premium comfort, cutting‑edge …
Skoda Octavia Combi
Mercedes GLC EQ

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Octavia Combi

The Skoda Octavia Combi is a practical, well‑packaged estate that delivers generous and flexible interior space ideal for families or active owners. Its sensible cabin layout, comfortable ride and solid reputation for reliability make it a pragmatic choice for buyers who value utility over flash.

details
SKODA_OCTAVIA_COMBI_Dynamisch_116407
SKODA_OCTAVIA_COMBI_Dynamisch_116406
SKODA_OCTAVIA_COMBI_Dynamisch_116402
SKODA_OCTAVIA_COMBI_e_TEC_116372

Reviews Skoda Octavia Combi

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Roberto
25 May 2026, 05:05:18

Una gran elección para autopista

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Roberto
25 May 2026, 04:58:36

Tiene mucho más espacio por menos dinero

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Andrzej
12 May 2026, 15:17:48

Great car with a dynamic 1.5 engine and a 7-speed automatic; a downside is the electronics, which often shut off—terrible when reversing!!! It could also have a bigger tank because it averages 7 liters and at most 700 km.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mercedes GLC EQ

The Mercedes GLC EQ brings an electrified touch to Mercedes’ compact luxury SUV line, combining a quiet, refined ride with the comfort and polish you expect from the brand. It’s a smart choice for buyers who want premium materials and everyday practicality while reducing fuel use, though it leans more toward comfort than sporty handling.

details
mercedes-glc-eq-2025
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (3)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (4)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (1)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (2)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (5)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (6)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (7)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (8)

Reviews Mercedes GLC EQ

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
Hannu
22 May 2026, 10:40:59

It looks like a Mercedes‑Benz and not a bar of soap. Rear space has improved. Air suspension. Luxurious materials. Great dashboard and display.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
IVAN
13 May 2026, 22:11:19

Aesthetic presence, good electric range and usable cargo hold...

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
IVAN
13 May 2026, 22:02:43

Great range, good looking, and virtually zero maintenance compare to the Range Rover which is the highest mainstream maintenance vehicle presently on the road..

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX60
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
Comparing the Volvo EX60 and the Mercedes GLC EQ pairs Volvo’s minimalist, safety-first electric SUV with Mercedes’ luxury-focused, tech-rich take on the midsize EV crossover. I'll highlight the key differences in driving dynamics, range, interior quality and running costs so you can choose the one …
Mercedes C-Class EQ
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
Comparing the Mercedes C‑Class EQ and the Mercedes GLC EQ pits a sleek, electrically powered executive saloon against a compact electric SUV — two different takes on premium Mercedes electrification. This brief comparison will focus on their size, practicality, driving feel and tech so you can …
Audi Q6 e-tron
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
Unsure whether the Audi Q6 e-tron or the Mercedes GLC EQ is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Skoda Karoq
Skoda Octavia Combi
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs and wagons, the Skoda Karoq and Skoda Octavia Combi each offer unique advantages suited to different driving preferences. The Skoda Karoq boasts a higher driving position and versatile off-road capabilities, perfect for adventurers seeking practicality …
Skoda Octavia Combi
Kia K4
VS
The Skoda Octavia Combi and Kia K4 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Kia Ceed Sportswagon
Skoda Octavia Combi
VS
Family-hauling face-off: the Kia Ceed Sportswagon serves big spec, a sweet drive and a long warranty for hatchback money, while the Skoda Octavia Estate counters with limo-like rear legroom, a cavernous boot and a more polished ride. If you prize value and low running costs, pick the Kia; if space, …
Skoda Octavia Combi
VW Golf Variant
VS
If your shopping list includes a boot that can swallow flat-pack furniture and weekend sports equipment without complaint, the Skoda Octavia Estate is the sensible giant with massive practicality and smart value, while the VW Golf Estate packages similar underpinnings into a neater, more refined …
Mercedes EQE SUV
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
Unsure whether the Mercedes EQE SUV or the Mercedes GLC EQ is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Skoda Octavia Combi
Mercedes GLC EQ

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,600 - 39,600 £
Price
61,100 - 70,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
645 - 714 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
113 - 157 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,366 - 1,553 kg
Curb weight
2,535 kg
Trunk capacity
640 L
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,829 mm
Width
1,913 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
502 - 534 kg
Payload
505 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 204 HP
Power HP
489 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.7 - 10.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
220 - 360 Nm
Torque
800 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
Power kW
360 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Is the Skoda Octavia Combi offered with different drivetrains?

The Skoda Octavia Combi is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.