@ Subaru Corporation
@ Volvo Cars
VS

Subaru Forester vs Volvo XC40 – Which model is better for everyday use?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Subaru Forester or Volvo XC40 fits your lifestyle better.

Subaru Forester

4 (1 Reviews)
rate

Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Forester @ Subaru Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Subaru Forester has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34700 £, while the Volvo XC40 costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 2057 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Volvo XC40 manages with 6.50 L and is therefore noticeable more efficient than the Subaru Forester with 8.10 L. The difference is about 1.60 L per 100 km.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC40 has a distinct edge – offering 197 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 61 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC40 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 7.60 s, while the Subaru Forester takes 12.20 s. That’s about 4.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Subaru Forester performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 188 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 8 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC40 pulls distinct stronger with 300 Nm compared to 182 Nm. That’s about 118 Nm difference.

Forester @ Subaru Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Volvo XC40 is hardly perceptible lighter – 1688 kg compared to 1693 kg. The difference is around 5 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Subaru Forester offers a bit more room – 508 L compared to 452 L. That’s a difference of about 56 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Subaru Forester performs evident better – up to 1731 L, which is about 403 L more than the Volvo XC40.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC40 slight takes the win – 532 kg compared to 492 kg. That’s a difference of about 40 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Volvo XC40 proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Volvo XC40 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Subaru Forester
Volvo XC40

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £36,800
XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Volvo XC40

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 163 - 197 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 6.50 L
details

Subaru Forester

4 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Subaru Forester is a practical all-rounder that quietly does everything right, with roomy comfort, excellent visibility and a real fondness for weekend adventures off the beaten path. It won't set your pulse racing like a sports car, but for buyers who prize reliability, safety and sensible charm, it's a brilliantly steady companion with a cheeky streak.

details
csm_ATP_3588_26cd8d3e91 @ Subaru Corporation
csm_ATP_3846_b1acfd59d3 @ Subaru Corporation
csm_ATP_3796_e529e6d83f @ Subaru Corporation
csm_ATP_3939_15099a6c78 @ Subaru Corporation
csm_ATP_4012_b1f29ad2a5 @ Subaru Corporation

Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal @ Volvo Cars
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl @ Volvo Cars

Reviews Subaru Forester

4 (1 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
Subaru Forester
Volvo XC40
Forester @ Subaru Corporation
XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price
34700 - 42200 £
Price
36800 - 47200 £
Consumption L/100km
8.10 L
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
183 g/km
co2
147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1693 - 1739 kg
Curb weight
1688 kg
Trunk capacity
508 L
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
4670 mm
Length
4425 mm
Width
1830 mm
Width
1863 mm
Height
1730 mm
Height
1652 mm
Max trunk capacity
1679 - 1731 L
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
Payload
446 - 492 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
136 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.20 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
188 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
182 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
100 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
1995 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Subaru
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo EX40
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Austral
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive realm of compact SUVs, the Renault Austral and the Volvo XC40 each offer distinct attributes catering to different customer desires. The Renault Austral emphasizes affordability and efficient urban maneuverability, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers seeking practicality. …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota RAV4
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Toyota RAV4 stands out with its robust reliability and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a popular choice for families and adventurers alike. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 features a more premium design and advanced safety technology, appealing to those …
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Honda HR-V
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda HR-V stands out for its versatile cargo space and user-friendly technology, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 impresses with its upscale interior and advanced safety features, appealing to those seeking …
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Lexus LBX and Volvo XC40 stand out with their distinctive styles and premium features. The LBX impresses with its sleek design and hybrid efficiency, appealing to eco-conscious drivers, while the XC40 offers a robust driving experience and top-notch …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the battle of sportiness and practicality, the CUPRA Formentor and Volvo XC40 present compelling choices for discerning drivers. The Formentor's dynamic styling and performance-oriented features exude a sense of excitement, while the XC40 offers a more refined and spacious interior paired with a …
What drivetrain options does the Subaru Forester have?

The Subaru Forester is available as All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.