Compare performance (110 HP vs 145 HP), boot space and price (21,800 £ vs 16,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki S-Cross or Citroen C3 Aircross?
In the rapidly evolving world of compact SUVs, the Citroen C3 Aircross and the Suzuki S-Cross have emerged as two strong contenders. Both models bring unique features and innovations to the table, each catering to different tastes and preferences. Let’s dive into their technical aspects to see how these two stack up against each other.
The Citroen C3 Aircross is a stylish compact SUV that boasts a length of 4395 mm, a width of 1795 mm, and a height of 1660 mm. Its commanding presence is complemented by a roomy interior, offering a trunk capacity of 460 liters. The Suzuki S-Cross, on the other hand, measures 4300 mm in length, 1785 mm in width, and 1580 mm in height, with a slightly smaller trunk capacity of 430 liters. Both vehicles offer ample space for five passengers, providing comfort for families and adventure seekers alike.
The C3 Aircross presents a versatile range of options, with engine types including Petrol MHEV, Petrol, and Electric. The power output ranges from 101 to 136 HP, ensuring a variety of performance levels tailored to different needs. Its front-wheel drive system and up to 230 Nm of torque make it a capable performer for city drives and occasional highway trips. Additionally, the electric variant of the C3 Aircross offers an impressive range of over 300 km, making it an attractive option for eco-conscious drivers.
The Suzuki S-Cross provides engine choices of a full hybrid and a petrol MHEV, delivering power outputs from 116 to 129 HP. Its available all-wheel drive system adds to its versatility, ensuring stable maneuverability on different terrains. With a strong torque of 235 Nm, the S-Cross promises smoother acceleration with its top speed reaching up to 195 km/h, making it slightly faster than the C3 Aircross.
When it comes to fuel economy, the Suzuki S-Cross stands out with consumption figures as low as 5.1 L/100km and CO2 emissions starting at 116 g/km. This makes it an appealing choice for those focused on reducing fuel expenses and minimizing environmental impact. The Citroen C3 Aircross, while offering hybrid and electric options, provides a slightly higher fuel consumption, starting at 5.5 L/100km, but the availability of a full electric version eliminates emissions entirely.
Both models step up their game with the latest automotive technologies. The Citroen C3 Aircross integrates a dual-clutch automatic transmission in its electric variant, promoting smoother gear changes and improved driving dynamics. It features advanced infotainment systems, making long drives both entertaining and intuitive.
Similarly, the Suzuki S-Cross offers an automated manual transmission alongside traditional options. Its infotainment system is user-friendly, with improved connectivity options, positioning the S-Cross as a tech-savvy choice for modern drivers.
Choosing between the Citroen C3 Aircross and the Suzuki S-Cross ultimately boils down to personal needs and preferences. The C3 Aircross excels in providing a selection of powertrains, including an eco-efficient electric model, complemented by French flair in design. The Suzuki S-Cross, meanwhile, is a robust contender with its hybrid options and slightly superior top speed, appealing to those who seek a blend of performance and efficiency. Whichever model you lean towards, both are sure to offer a fulfilling driving experience in the compact SUV segment.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Citroen C3 Aircross is visibly cheaper – starting at 16,200 £ , while the Suzuki S-Cross costs 21,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,571 £.
Both cars consume an average of 5.3 L/100km – no difference here.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Citroen C3 Aircross offers noticeably more power – delivering 145 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 35 HP more horsepower.
Looking at top speed, the Suzuki S-Cross is noticeably faster – reaching 185 km/h, while the Citroen C3 Aircross tops out at 143 km/h. The difference is around 42 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Suzuki S-Cross delivers marginally more torque with 235 Nm compared to 230 Nm. That’s about 5 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is barely lighter – 1,280 kg compared to 1,312 kg. The difference is around 32 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Citroen C3 Aircross offers only slightly more boot space – 460 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 30 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Citroen C3 Aircross offers noticeably more capacity – up to 1,600 L, about 370 L more than the Suzuki S-Cross.
When it comes to payload, the Citroen C3 Aircross carries a bit more – 462 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 57 kg.
The Citroen C3 Aircross stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Suzuki S-Cross is a neatly packaged crossover that puts everyday practicality ahead of showy theatrics, offering a comfortable cabin and predictable handling that suit family life and weekend errands alike. It’s not a headline-grabber, but its sensible packaging, low-key charm and reputation for reliability make it a shrewd choice for buyers who prefer smart value over flash.
details
The Citroën C3 Aircross is a cheeky compact SUV that trades bland conformity for playful French character and clever practicality, ideal if you want a car with personality. It soaks up city life with a comfortable ride, inventive cabin tricks and a look that turns heads without asking for attention.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
|
Price
16,200 - 28,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.1 - 18.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
303 - 400 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
119 - 138 g/km
|
co2
0 - 134 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
|
Curb weight
1,312 - 1,608 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
430 L
|
Trunk capacity
460 L
|
|
Length
4,305 mm
|
Length
4,395 mm
|
|
Width
1,785 mm
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
|
Height
1,580 mm
|
Height
1,640 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,230 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,600 L
|
|
Payload
395 - 405 kg
|
Payload
407 - 462 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
110 HP
|
Power HP
101 - 145 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.3 - 13 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 - 185 km/h
|
Max Speed
143 km/h
|
|
Torque
235 Nm
|
Torque
125 - 230 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
81 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 107 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España