Compare performance (82 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (17,100 £ vs 46,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki Swift or Volvo EC40?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Suzuki Swift is considerably cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Volvo EC40 costs 46,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 29,392 £.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 offers significantly more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 360 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EC40 delivers considerably more torque with 670 Nm compared to 112 Nm. That’s about 558 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swift is significantly lighter – 1,069 kg compared to 2,065 kg. The difference is around 996 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo EC40 carries visibly more – 435 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 139 kg.
The Volvo EC40 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Suzuki Swift is a cheeky little hatch that turns city streets into its playground with lively handling and a grin-inducing drive. Practical enough for daily chores, thrifty to run and kinder on your wallet than many rivals, it's a sensible pick for buyers who want fun without drama.
detailsThe Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
17,100 - 21,200 £
|
Price
46,500 - 56,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 4.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
486 - 585 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
98 - 110 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,069 - 1,145 kg
|
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,185 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
404 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,735 mm
|
Width
1,873 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
282 - 296 kg
|
Payload
395 - 435 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
82 HP
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
112 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
61 kW
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,197 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Brand
Volvo
|